Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Straight Adult Websites' started by the_gooners, Jan 29, 2012.
this is real
Yeah, that is "real"-ly bad photoshop.
Just like the pic in the OP's link.
i agree with alphamale, plus if your gonna measure something next to your dick don't start down by your balls
Dude, what happened to your pointer finger? It's like it got caught in a drive by enlargement attempt and ended up getting distorted by an image editing program. My advice would be to surreptitiously replace that picture with a better version as soon as possible.
Oh, and it's kinda rude to attempt to hijack threads with unrelated pics of your cock.
I think the cock just looks so long cause its not very thick.
This could be real, obviously hes measuring form his balls but the remote is about 9 inches long so subtract an inch or two for his balls and plus an inch cos hes past the end of th remote and he could be about 8- 8.5 inches or so which is reasonable.
Although the crappy pic quality does make it look a bit bad.
Look at the distortion on the index finger.
Uhm... right or left hand?
I have to admit I can never see any of these distortions in the pics and I'm terrible and spot the difference. I think I'm just crap at details could you point it out?
Id love to comment....
.... but my answer is no longer allowed under new lpsg tos.
Ahhh good point. I hadn't been actively browsing the boards for a while and just found the alteration to the rules on this point. Sorry about that, mods. Won't happen again.
bobg, you'll just have to figure it out for yourself.
Why can't you tell me?
At least give a hint.
Well op's link is not a lpsg member that I know of, so I can say that one is fake.
its not fake as people on chat theyve seen it but ok you guys with small dicks can feel happy if you want
What new term of service are you referring to? I poked about but could not find anything.
So basically anyone can photoshop their pics and no-one is allowed to say anything about it, otherwise it is "harassment".
I could be mistaken, but I think that new rule has to do more with calling people out for gender faking and not with photoshopping their pics.
And/or people just being deceitful in general about who they are. I.e. a guy posting pics of another guy and saying that it's him when it's not.
"Any posts by members calling each other out as fake, or posting comments about the validity of a members images and the likes will be considered harassment"
That's pretty clear to me that you're not allowed to question the validity of an image. It's a dumb rule that opens the door to deception, but that's what it says.
Again, could be mistaken, but I'm pretty sure by "validity of a members images" they mean it in the gender faking and/or claiming pics are of you when they are not way.
Example: Person's profile has a bunch of hot pics of a female. Another member saying, "Hey those pics aren't of you, they are of some hot chick!" is questioning the validity of their images.
Not whether they are photoshopped or not.
Could be wrong I guess. I just never read that rule to mean that. Maybe it was worded ambiguously on purpose.
Go post your badly photoshopped pic on some more random threads...