"Its not the size that counts..."

[B_HappyHammer1977]

Originally posted by nicky9x6+Sep 20 2005, 05:03 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(nicky9x6 &#064; Sep 20 2005, 05:03 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'>

Originally posted by HappyHammer1977@Sep 16 2005, 12:53 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-DC_DEEP

@Sep 16 2005, 12:26 PM
Most of the complaints I have heard or read, especially on this forum, is not a "loose" vagina, but occasionally one that is too tight, or more often, not deep enough to accomodate a massively long cock.  I&#39;m sure a few are legitimate, but I would venture to guess that most of the claims that "I can only get in about halfway" are fiction.

[post=343735]Quoted post[/post]​

"Only about halfway" is at best wishful thinking for even the most well-endowed man. Most women, as a general rule, can take upto 10ins before it gets painful....
As for the porn/cervix thing you mentioned, I&#39;m pretty much positive in saying that porn stars are not as well hung as they state (not saying they&#39;re small, of course not&#33 But I&#39;ve seen people like Lex Steele and John Holmes; their "official measurments" don&#39;t add up&#33; Lex is supposed to 11". 9" if you&#39;re lucky dude&#33; Holmes is supposed to be 13.5". Crap&#33; 9.5" at best, maybe less.

[post=343749]Quoted post[/post]​

Agreed. Actually, I read that Holmes himself never claimed more than 10". The 13.5" to 18" range was invented later, by the [very lucrative] Holmes industry after he died. Penis inflation is inevitable as truly humongous meat like Holmes&#39; is a rare phenomenon indeed.
When you have sat through hundreds of hours of porn featuring at best average sized penes where the blurb has boasted &#39;foot-long cocks&#39; you realise how essential this particular marketing lie has become to the business of pornography.

[post=344872]Quoted post[/post]​

[/b][/quote]

I don&#39;t know how much porn I&#39;ve seen over the years, but its alot. The decent stuff only became legal over here about 3 or 4 years ago, so I&#39;ve been cramming&#33;&#33;&#33; But I&#39;m sure I&#39;m becoming immune to it&#33; The best one I&#39;ve got, in my eyes is the first one I had...the boxes always lie&#33; So you end up with the same old &#39;factory line&#39; rubbish.

 

[Ryandaoc]

Happy, to get back on target then....

My wife had to have some kind of surgery when she was a younger girl. One goal of the surgery was to "open things up". I don&#39;t know the specifics but she always said that she couldn&#39;t use tampons because they hurt so bad to put in.

After the babies were born she was deathly afraid that she would be on the "big" side and that she would lose feeling and sexual pleasure.

She did her kiegle (sp?) excercises and we had to throw out doggy style (something shifted and now she says it hurts to bad) but other than that everything snapped back nicely. Actually, sex is way better than it was before.

So yes, size matters even for women.

 

[B_HappyHammer1977]

Originally posted by Ryandaoc@Sep 20 2005, 11:25 PM
Happy, to get back on target then....

My wife had to have some kind of surgery when she was a younger girl. One goal of the surgery was to "open things up". I don&#39;t know the specifics but she always said that she couldn&#39;t use tampons because they hurt so bad to put in.

After the babies were born she was deathly afraid that she would be on the "big" side and that she would lose feeling and sexual pleasure.

She did her kiegle (sp?) excercises and we had to throw out doggy style (something shifted and now she says it hurts to bad) but other than that everything snapped back nicely. Actually, sex is way better than it was before.

So yes, size matters even for women.

[post=345108]Quoted post[/post]​

Glad to hear it&#33; Happy shaggin&#39;&#33;