It's Still Bush's Fault

Discussion in 'Politics' started by sargon20, Jul 27, 2011.

  1. sargon20

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Messages:
    11,370
    Likes Received:
    2,101
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Atlantis
  2. oralslut464

    oralslut464 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2011
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Missouri
    I don't think this graph is accurate. obama needs to own up to his spending - He just keeps spending and spending and spending now a war in Lybia as well.
     
  3. vibrationzzz

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2007
    Messages:
    14,454
    Albums:
    2
    Likes Received:
    1,320
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    South East Queensland (aus)
    I think greed has been around longer than that.
     
  4. slurper_la

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2008
    Messages:
    5,359
    Albums:
    2
    Likes Received:
    717
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Los Angeles (CA, US)
    it's time to change the channel
     
  5. backwoodsstud

    backwoodsstud Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    321
    Likes Received:
    3
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    dark side of the moon.
    Agreed.
     
  6. Horrible

    Horrible New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Messages:
    438
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Texas
    Where is that little bullshit flag?

    Not at all surprised at who the OP is...

    Change the record already.
     
  7. Thedrewbert

    Thedrewbert Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    579
    Albums:
    2
    Likes Received:
    23
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Pittsburgh
    The Bush tax cuts alone eclipse any total spending that Obama has done. And yes those tax cuts were spending because we didn't have the budget for them... so we actually had to borrow money because of it.
     
  8. houtx48

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2006
    Messages:
    7,095
    Likes Received:
    35
    Gender:
    Male
    Obama has not spent anywhere near what Zippy W. spent but there is still time. I wouls really like to see an accounting of Katrina expenditures. I get the feeling someone got mega wealthy off that one.
     
  9. slurper_la

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2008
    Messages:
    5,359
    Albums:
    2
    Likes Received:
    717
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Los Angeles (CA, US)
    let's not forget it was Bush who engaged us in two wars and did so "off-budget" - the republicans who controlled congress during 6.5 of his 8 year term were complicit by approving supplemental spending bills.

    and please let's not forget the $700,000,000,000 Bush and Paulson handed over to Wall Street with NO STRINGS ATTACHED

    and then there's the 6,000,000 jobs lost during Bush's term

    Here's a little something to chew on: While the median annual salary for Americans hovers around $39,000 (and has dropped 4% over the past 30 years) the income of the top .1% increased 400% in 2010 alone.

    the 25 top hedge fund managers earned a combined 22 BILLION dollars in 2010 and took most of the earnings as capital gains - paying ONLY 15% in taxes!

    the top 1% control $9,000,000,000

    Now many, including me, think people who work hard deserve to earn whatever they can. They absolutely deserve the spoils of hard work and smart decisions. However what we now have in our midst are not hard-working earners who produce product and jobs but gamers who use a lot of their gains to buy politicians and work to rewrite legislation to skew the odds in their favor
     
  10. B_enzia35

    B_enzia35 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2011
    Messages:
    878
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Texas
    Why do liberals think that tax cuts can be applied as debt? What kind of mindset does it take to ASSUME that it's federal money already?
    And Obamacare only costing $152 billion...sure.
     
  11. MGdude12

    MGdude12 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2009
    Messages:
    272
    Likes Received:
    8
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    USA
    That graph isn't accurate. Tax cuts were not "additional spending." If you look at government revenue over a given period of time, it was decreasing until the Bush tax cuts took effect. After the Bush tax cuts, revenue began to increase. Tax cuts stimulate economic growth which increases total revenue.
     
  12. Industrialsize

    Staff Member Moderator Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2006
    Messages:
    24,283
    Albums:
    2
    Likes Received:
    2,121
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    United States
    This couldn't be further from the truth.
     
    #12 Industrialsize, Jul 28, 2011
    Last edited: Jul 28, 2011
  13. B_enzia35

    B_enzia35 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2011
    Messages:
    878
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Texas
  14. Industrialsize

    Staff Member Moderator Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2006
    Messages:
    24,283
    Albums:
    2
    Likes Received:
    2,121
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    United States
    Heritage Foundation?

    Heritage Foundation de-bunked:
    The Heritage Foundation's Brian Riedl accuses me of committing economic malpractice and cherry-picking data on a column that argued against permanently extending the Bush tax cuts. Okay, I’ll engage on that.

    PostPartisan - Did the Bush tax cuts reduce revenue? Of course.
     
  15. snakembl14

    snakembl14 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    GB, WI
    Guess what...Bush and Obama are both the same...you've been brainwashed to think they are different.

    Both spent ALOT more than what they should have

    Both went/expanded into needless "wars"
     
  16. Ldnn

    Ldnn Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2007
    Messages:
    108
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    4
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Oslo (NO)
    Libya billed as a 'black hole' is rather missing the point mind you, it simply isn't. If you look at the encumbent costs from Iraq and Afghanistan they dwarf the figure of $30-100m per week Libya is costing the US, depending how much you bomb things of course (Harrison, Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2011).

    Currently there are a large amount of allied aircraft doing the actual bombing, so the munition costs - one of the more significant costs in this sort of operation - are spread more evenly than in previous conflicts, even if the logistical support isn't. Indeed Harrison states the operational cost will likely "easily top $1bn". Compared to the combined price of Iraq and Afghanistan (roughly $2.4tn), you can see it's really a drop in the ocean.

    Looking at the recent debt reduction plans both by Boehner and Reid, Boehner got his math wrong by $350Bn (CBO) and there are questions regarding Reid's bill to the tune of $150-200Bn, that's enough money in an accounting mistake for 100+ Libya "wars". I'm sorry, but mentioning Libya in the same paragraph as sovereign debt is just misleading, even if we were bombing Libya for 10 years, it wouldn't cost the US more than 1% what Iraq and Afghanistan have cost to date.
     
  17. snakembl14

    snakembl14 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    GB, WI
    Saying obama only did libya is ridiculious. He is the commander in chief...and he expanded afgan, bombed libya, expanded drone attacks significantly in pakistan.

    Granted he may not have started this...but he hasn't done anything to stop any of it. How long can he and others push the blame on bush? Its his problem now and he needs to follow through on his promises!
     
  18. Ldnn

    Ldnn Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2007
    Messages:
    108
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    4
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Oslo (NO)
    Well, isn't the problem that if he pulls the military out and stops drone attacks, he's "soft on terrorism" and unpatriotic? Indeed if I remember correctly Obama opposed the escalation of troop involvement in Iraq in '08 which actually got some success in making the place safer - hence finishing this decade-long occupation sooner and reducing overall cost.

    Regarding the Afghanistan troop push, from what I understand of it, a great deal occured when Pakistan decided it wasn't going to co-operate and instead give terrorists free passage into Afghanistan proper due to it being in their interest to destabalise the region and get rid of the US presence. I doubt it's a coincidence that as Iraq becomes "safer", Afghanistan became steadily worse. Drone attacks mind you.. seem comparatively 'cheap' and much safer in terms of lives. I'm not sure what the American consensus is (if there is one?) regarding drone use, but at least elsewhere most people approve of it, provided they don't bomb too many shepherds of course.

    I absolutely agree with you that he needs to follow through on his promises. I'm no Obama-fan, I think most of what he originally promised hasn't been achieved, or if it has been, it's too watered down to have the impact he originally intended. Perhaps that's due to the way bills tend to have so many attachments in order to pacify opposition.

    Overall though, politicians need to stop running their mouth to win votes when they're fully aware that the situation will demand another response entirely once they're in office. Anyone who actually expected him to pull out all of the troops within a year was pretty naive, in my view.
     
    #18 Ldnn, Jul 28, 2011
    Last edited: Jul 28, 2011
  19. B_Marius567

    B_Marius567 New Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,952
    Likes Received:
    5
    Gender:
    Male
    I never voted for bush or obama so its not my fault.
     
  20. houtx48

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2006
    Messages:
    7,095
    Likes Received:
    35
    Gender:
    Male
    I voted for both one time each, if things keep going the way they are at the moment one will get two votes from me.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted