It's time to ban seancody.com

Look at the question in my text ...

  • YES

    Votes: 26 17.8%
  • NO

    Votes: 120 82.2%

  • Total voters
    146
  • Poll closed .

SprkE08

Admired Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 11, 2006
Posts
1,090
Media
46
Likes
999
Points
433
Verification
View
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
i do find it strange that all of a sudden they're finding it necessary to highlight bareback content...their models have always been attractive enough for that not to be a selling point in my opinion.

How about dropping one's subscription to SeanCody because the performers are 99% white???

the elephant in the room...i think this is one of the things that's spawning just as many issues in the gay community as the promotion of bareback sex but no one is willing to discuss it. racism in the gay community thinly veiled as a personal preference is at an all time high...porn sites aren't exactly helping by proliferating a standard either.
 

EdWoody

Superior Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2006
Posts
3,377
Media
4
Likes
7,088
Points
368
Location
Manchester (England)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
I would have thought that Sean Cody's niche was young, inexperienced, gay/bi/curious college boys who aren't professional porn actors. I feel most uncomfortable about enabling them to be paid to have unsafe sex. I know they would claim to be tested. I also feel Sean Cody's mass audience should have the safer sex message reinforced, not weakened.
Agreed 100%. Testing is all well and good, but why not provide a good example by showing the condom being used as well?


How about dropping one's subscription to SeanCody because the performers are 99% white???
Perhaps because he doesn't see that as problem? Having a personal taste is not automatically the same as being a racist.


On the topic of safe sex... You realize many sites have been doing fairly regular testing of their models lately, to make sure theyre all HIV negative, etc. If both participants are HIV negative, then no one will get HIV. I really don't understand what the problem is.
The problem is the example is sets for the viewers.


Straight sex and porn are probably the WORST for bareback yet no one complains about them, so why here?
I don't care about straight people - straight people are taken care of my society at large. Nobody takes cares of gay people, so we have to take care of ourselves.


lvsxy808 ... good job! i did the same. and i am sure we're not the only ones.
may i ask you to tell us what they replied? just curious about it ...
Happy to, assuming they bother to reply with anything beyond a generic "thank you for your comments."

I also posted it on various porn blogs, where I'm sure it will rile up the bareback apologists to no end.

.
 

D_Judith K Rantz

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2011
Posts
378
Media
0
Likes
4
Points
53
Sexuality
No Response
You pay for porn...? :wtf:

I think it's a personal decision, if you don't like the changes the site/he has made then terminate your membership. Maybe if enough people hate the change they'll start reverting back to the original videos.
 

D_22

Cherished Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Posts
2,383
Media
33
Likes
492
Points
228
Location
NYC
Sexuality
60% Gay, 40% Straight
Gender
Male
How about dropping one's subscription to SeanCody because the performers are 99% white???

Recently they added this Asian to their roster, Immanuel. I don't recall the last time a Sean Cody dude turned me on so much... I think Ajax was the last one. Actually, no, last one was Landon, the last black dude they had. I have also noticed the lack of minorities in general.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Johnjingles

SprkE08

Admired Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 11, 2006
Posts
1,090
Media
46
Likes
999
Points
433
Verification
View
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
Perhaps because he doesn't see that as problem? Having a personal taste is not automatically the same as being a racist.

...

The problem is the example is sets for the viewers.

you really addressed where there's an issue in your very own post. being a member of the LGBT community - may i as you a question? how many times have you come across ads (if you've every used personal ads) where people will place such information as "sorry, only into white guys" or "no black guys please" "no asians" and the like?

there's an example being set in adult entertainment by the largest producers of such media. they set and perpetuate a standard for what's to be considered attractive and what's not. it's not just in our community, it's the media at large, but there's no denying that within our community it's exacerbating a real problem...
 

tray22nc

Sexy Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Posts
475
Media
0
Likes
64
Points
103
"I don't care about straight people - straight people are taken care of my society at large. Nobody takes cares of gay people, so we have to take care of ourselves."

Wow. That's a pretty ignorant and self-centered thing to say. While I can understand your view, I would certainly hope that you don't actually mean that.

As far as SC using bareback scenes now...condomless doesn't always mean unsafe and condoms don't equate to always being safe. Condoms are safer, yes, but there are ALWAYS risks involved with sex....straight or gay. Rather than making a huge ordeal out of this situation (by which, you are only promoting the site, wether you realize it or not) simply cancel your membership and do not support those sites that have condomless sex. Feel free to contact the site and explain why you're cancelling. As other may have done the same thing, the site and its owners may realize that they are losing loyal viewers. However, looking at it from another view, tastes change, demand changes, audiences change, and in order to keep with demand, the supply must change. Using an example from earlier, restaurants change their menus to keep up with demand. And while some may not like the change and seek other venues, other people will be brought in with the "new and improved." We don't always get our way, so we deal with the change. I think this may be one of those situations, at least for the moment. If enough people complain, I'm sure there will, once again, come change.
 

BareBear612

1st Like
Joined
Dec 6, 2010
Posts
2
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
36
Location
Minneapolis Minnesota
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
If you don't believe in bareback fucking.......Don't
If you won't watch bareback fucking...........Don't

Do NOT inflict your opinion and beliefs on me or any other person

If I get the chance I play raw I do
and I don't care what YOU think !!!!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: AgHarley

EdWoody

Superior Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2006
Posts
3,377
Media
4
Likes
7,088
Points
368
Location
Manchester (England)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
you really addressed where there's an issue in your very own post. being a member of the LGBT community - may i as you a question? how many times have you come across ads (if you've every used personal ads) where people will place such information as "sorry, only into white guys" or "no black guys please" "no asians" and the like?
I haven't really used those since the days of AOL. But I do know what you mean. And I'm not defending those people at all - they're definitely assholes. I'm just saying that if a person likes a website that happens to feature mostly white guys, that doesn't necessarily mean that he likes it because it features white guys, or that other races wouldn't be welcome on that site or cause him to cancel his membership. Nor that he should cancel his membership because somoene else perceives a racial bias, if he himself does not perceive that bias.

If only white people apply to be on the site, then only white people will appear on the site. Although it is fair to say that maybe it's only white men who apply because those other races don't see themselves represented and therefore don't think they're wanted. On the other hand, the models of other races who have appeared on there have mostly been met with huge popularity, so the producers should know a bit of racial diversity is not a problem. On the third hand, they shouldn't hire models of non-white races just because they need more non-white models if the model is not actually attractive.

there's an example being set in adult entertainment by the largest producers of such media. they set and perpetuate a standard for what's to be considered attractive and what's not. it's not just in our community, it's the media at large, but there's no denying that within our community it's exacerbating a real problem...
The one that annoys me the most is the assumption that black men can only appear in gay porn as some kind of fetishized "thug porn" thing. All races are welcome in my porn, no doubt. But I'd rather they were all mixed in together rather than separated out into their own niches, for example "Niggaz on the DL," "OMG this Asian guy has a big dick, how crazy is that?" and their like.

None of which is really the point of the thread, of course. Bareback is bad!

.
 

EdWoody

Superior Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2006
Posts
3,377
Media
4
Likes
7,088
Points
368
Location
Manchester (England)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
If you don't believe in bareback fucking.......Don't
If you won't watch bareback fucking...........Don't

Do NOT inflict your opinion and beliefs on me or any other person

If I get the chance I play raw I do
and I don't care what YOU think !!!!!!

Then I hope you enjoy your AIDS.

.
 

SprkE08

Admired Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 11, 2006
Posts
1,090
Media
46
Likes
999
Points
433
Verification
View
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
I haven't really used those since the days of AOL. But I do know what you mean. And I'm not defending those people at all - they're definitely assholes. I'm just saying that if a person likes a website that happens to feature mostly white guys, that doesn't necessarily mean that he likes it because it features white guys, or that other races wouldn't be welcome on that site or cause him to cancel his membership. Nor that he should cancel his membership because somoene else perceives a racial bias, if he himself does not perceive that bias.

If only white people apply to be on the site, then only white people will appear on the site. Although it is fair to say that maybe it's only white men who apply because those other races don't see themselves represented and therefore don't think they're wanted. On the other hand, the models of other races who have appeared on there have mostly been met with huge popularity, so the producers should know a bit of racial diversity is not a problem. On the third hand, they shouldn't hire models of non-white races just because they need more non-white models if the model is not actually attractive.


The one that annoys me the most is the assumption that black men can only appear in gay porn as some kind of fetishized "thug porn" thing. All races are welcome in my porn, no doubt. But I'd rather they were all mixed in together rather than separated out into their own niches, for example "Niggaz on the DL," "OMG this Asian guy has a big dick, how crazy is that?" and their like.

None of which is really the point of the thread, of course. Bareback is bad!

.

you're raising valid points - i think that's all swede was attempting to do as well. not necessarily accusing the op of being a racist because he likes sean cody (because if that's the case...i'd be a self-hater using that logic which isn't true lol) but more so adding to the list of reasons why they're becoming more of a problem than entertainment. i agree with swede. though i may be hypocritical because i routinely stroke my cock to some SC, i see where he's coming from and i acknowledge the issue he raised as well as the ones you brought up as well. it's all one in the same - damaging to our community.
 

Blackle

Experimental Member
Joined
May 22, 2009
Posts
58
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
93
Location
Seattle
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
Since when have porn producers been PC? Uh, Fuck PC anyway. Don't think that condoms in porn really made a difference to anyone with enough blood pumping in their shaft to jam it through a splintered hole in the wall. I like bareback porn. Condoms are not natural. That is why its sells so much better. I know the zeitgeist is safe sex and PC'ness, but in the back of your mind when you see bareback porn (no matter where you stand on the issue) it looks natural. This whole debate is like a tree that fell in the forest or an owl that's up during the day.
 
Last edited:

likemHUNG12

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2008
Posts
906
Media
0
Likes
37
Points
103
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Websites have been doing bareback for years.If you dont like it dont buy it.simple.Nothing else you can do about it.Isnt SeanCody the old guy that just had to be in all of his vids?Turned me off.I have never bought any of those vids.
 

myass111aa

1st Like
Joined
Sep 19, 2010
Posts
64
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
91
Location
Dallas, TX
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Don't like it? Don't buy it. Let economics do the rest. You're only one person. Not the world. One person can't change anything. Get real.
 

myass111aa

1st Like
Joined
Sep 19, 2010
Posts
64
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
91
Location
Dallas, TX
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Thank you!
I fully support the OccupyEverywhere movement and when I had a free day, I helped out; but it STILL hasn't done anything.
 

tray22nc

Sexy Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Posts
475
Media
0
Likes
64
Points
103
Then I hope you enjoy your AIDS.

.

Are you fucking kidding me?? :eek: Not only is that such a horrible statement to make, it makes you seem like you're an ignorant 10 year old little bitch who has to throw insults to get your point across. (Yes, I realize what I said was a little insulting as well, but come on...)

Do you really think that just because someone has sex without a condom they are going to contract HIV?? It isn't the most responsible way of fucking, but nonetheless, it doesn't always mean that the person will have "AIDS" afterwards.

Don't watch bareback porn if you don't like it. Don't pay your money to a porn site that does bareback. But please, shut the fuck up crying about it and go on to something a little more important and pressing in your own life and leave well enough alone. :mad:
(Let the hateful comments begin, I guess....)
 

EdWoody

Superior Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2006
Posts
3,377
Media
4
Likes
7,088
Points
368
Location
Manchester (England)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Are you fucking kidding me?? :eek: Not only is that such a horrible statement to make, it makes you seem like you're an ignorant 10 year old little bitch who has to throw insults to get your point across. (Yes, I realize what I said was a little insulting as well, but come on...)
What I am is a 36 year old man who grew up in the time when people actually took this seriously. In the 80s, when I was being educated, thousands of gay men were dying of this every month. What people seem to have forgotten is that people are still dying, HIV/AIDS is still out there, and there is still no cure. Why that seems to be of no concern to some people is mind-boggling to me.

Do you really think that just because someone has sex without a condom they are going to contract HIV??

YES.

YES YES YES.

The facts are these - if you wear one, you won't get it. If you don't wear one, you will get it. There is always a margin of error, but it is vanishingly small compared to the protection that condoms provide. That you even have to question this makes me fear for your standard of education.

Don't watch bareback porn if you don't like it. Don't pay your money to a porn site that does bareback. But please, shut the fuck up crying about it and go on to something a little more important and pressing in your own life and leave well enough alone.
I will never ever shut up about it, ever in my life.

.
 

Scott2005

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2006
Posts
133
Media
0
Likes
233
Points
273
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
I think the solution to the OP's problem is simple: don't watch/pay for Sean Cody! If you are so upset about it, don't watch it. The only thing you are doing now is giving SC free advertising.

Sidenote: attacking people for disagreeing with you is so immature. If you're 36, you should know better. Not everyone is going to agree with you. And you certainly can't push your beliefs of onto other people. I think you should grow up a little.

Besides...it's just porn. There are a lot more important things to grow grey over....like how are we going to keep Michelle Bachman (or one of the numerous other dingbats) out of office!