Jackhammer Jesus dildo?

I suspect that it's intended to be insulting, it's not merely a harmless joke, but how outrageous it really is I don't know. Besides broadly coarse satire of religious images and iconography is as old as religion. It's not funny or original but it's not shocking or outrageous.
 
While in no way defending either the object linked in the OP or blasphemy in general, it is a type of eroticised thinking* for many people. Pornographic images in the 18th and 19th century are full of nuns and priests, to say nothing of the writings of the Marquis de Sade.

*What someone else would call a fetish, but it's not. A fetish is eroticising an inanimate object like leather or a specific odor, not a mindset or way of thinking, like blasphemy.
 
I wonder what kinds of drugs these people are doing.


Actually having a look around that site I have a feeling that it might well be jovial in intent I mean the Buddha dildo is positively gnome-like. At any rate they needn't be on drugs to be producing these kind of things.
 
Last edited:
I'd be curious to know the mindset of someone who got off using one, not in a joking way, but in a serious way.

I'd be curious, but I might not want to get too close.
 
Actually having a look around that site I have a feeling that it might well be jovial in intent I mean the Buddha dildo is positively gnome-like. At any rate they needn't be on drugs to be producing these kind of things.
I would find a Buddha dildo or a Muhammad dildo or a Ganesh dildo equally offensive.