Jeremy Barker

Anime2

Mythical Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2019
Posts
4,185
Media
0
Likes
39,220
Points
308
Location
London (Greater London, England)
Sexuality
Unsure
Gender
Male

whatx333

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2018
Posts
21
Media
0
Likes
37
Points
298
Location
Greenwich (Connecticut, United States)
Sexuality
No Response
I think he is unbelievably attractive, however he tries to rip people off on onlyfans. He says to tip for vids and never sends them. I tipped $50 on a post and he just replied "thank you" and when I asked for the video he said that it would be another $100+ dollars and sent me a preview of a video with another creator ,which I had already bought from the other creator for $15! He's tried to charge 10x the amount for the same video!
 

Crushed Coconut

Superior Member
Joined
May 5, 2019
Posts
2,797
Media
0
Likes
7,965
Points
158
Location
Michigan (United States)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
I think he is unbelievably attractive, however he tries to rip people off on onlyfans. He says to tip for vids and never sends them. I tipped $50 on a post and he just replied "thank you" and when I asked for the video he said that it would be another $100+ dollars and sent me a preview of a video with another creator ,which I had already bought from the other creator for $15! He's tried to charge 10x the amount for the same video!
The vast majority of OF is a scam. It's basically a collection of people attempting to make maximum profit off of minimal input. It basically appeals to superfans who are hungry and desperate for any morsel that might be thrown their way.

I don't mean to disparage anyone (models or fans), but that's the sad reality of it. I always find it amusing when people boast about OF, saying it allows models to have "creative control". That may be technically true, but it also cuts both ways. It means the models can put out short, low-quality videos (which they often do) and call it a work of art because they know there's people out there who will plop down money for it. Studios have standards for what makes an acceptable video. And if they shoot a scene that doesn't meet that criteria, they don't release it. OF has no such restrictions.
 

Anime2

Mythical Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2019
Posts
4,185
Media
0
Likes
39,220
Points
308
Location
London (Greater London, England)
Sexuality
Unsure
Gender
Male
The vast majority of OF is a scam. It's basically a collection of people attempting to make maximum profit off of minimal input. It basically appeals to superfans who are hungry and desperate for any morsel that might be thrown their way.

I don't mean to disparage anyone (models or fans), but that's the sad reality of it. I always find it amusing when people boast about OF, saying it allows models to have "creative control". That may be technically true, but it also cuts both ways. It means the models can put out short, low-quality videos (which they often do) and call it a work of art because they know there's people out there who will plop down money for it. Studios have standards for what makes an acceptable video. And if they shoot a scene that doesn't meet that criteria, they don't release it. OF has no such restrictions.
Absolute facts
 

marrepe123

Loved Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2019
Posts
137
Media
0
Likes
640
Points
188
Location
Philadelphia (Pennsylvania, United States)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
The vast majority of OF is a scam. It's basically a collection of people attempting to make maximum profit off of minimal input. It basically appeals to superfans who are hungry and desperate for any morsel that might be thrown their way.

I don't mean to disparage anyone (models or fans), but that's the sad reality of it. I always find it amusing when people boast about OF, saying it allows models to have "creative control". That may be technically true, but it also cuts both ways. It means the models can put out short, low-quality videos (which they often do) and call it a work of art because they know there's people out there who will plop down money for it. Studios have standards for what makes an acceptable video. And if they shoot a scene that doesn't meet that criteria, they don't release it. OF has no such restrictions.
If subscribing to OF has taught me anything, it's that doing porn is an absolute skill. Jeremy has done it, obviously, but not by himself. He isn't seasoned like the Johnny Sins, Manuel Ferra, etc who can make an OF and know how to film, create, and sell content. Anything he's learned is from the HGF crew, and well, lol
 

Anime2

Mythical Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2019
Posts
4,185
Media
0
Likes
39,220
Points
308
Location
London (Greater London, England)
Sexuality
Unsure
Gender
Male
If subscribing to OF has taught me anything, it's that doing porn is an absolute skill. Jeremy has done it, obviously, but not by himself. He isn't seasoned like the Johnny Sins, Manuel Ferra, etc who can make an OF and know how to film, create, and sell content. Anything he's learned is from the HGF crew, and well, lol
I agree a good example collin Simpson in studio porn is amazing love most of his scenes. But his own stuff is terrible. And the OF pages that are doing well they copy the format of studio porn
 

whatx333

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2018
Posts
21
Media
0
Likes
37
Points
298
Location
Greenwich (Connecticut, United States)
Sexuality
No Response
The vast majority of OF is a scam. It's basically a collection of people attempting to make maximum profit off of minimal input. It basically appeals to superfans who are hungry and desperate for any morsel that might be thrown their way.

I don't mean to disparage anyone (models or fans), but that's the sad reality of it. I always find it amusing when people boast about OF, saying it allows models to have "creative control". That may be technically true, but it also cuts both ways. It means the models can put out short, low-quality videos (which they often do) and call it a work of art because they know there's people out there who will plop down money for it. Studios have standards for what makes an acceptable video. And if they shoot a scene that doesn't meet that criteria, they don't release it. OF has no such restrictions.
I totally agree. It’s always one of those late-night and on ambien purchases that you always regret. There’s been maybe two or three accounts that are worth it
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crushed Coconut

Inthepine

Superior Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Feb 9, 2019
Posts
1,066
Media
0
Likes
7,753
Points
583
Location
Georgia, USA
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
The vast majority of OF is a scam. It's basically a collection of people attempting to make maximum profit off of minimal input. It basically appeals to superfans who are hungry and desperate for any morsel that might be thrown their way.

I don't mean to disparage anyone (models or fans), but that's the sad reality of it. I always find it amusing when people boast about OF, saying it allows models to have "creative control". That may be technically true, but it also cuts both ways. It means the models can put out short, low-quality videos (which they often do) and call it a work of art because they know there's people out there who will plop down money for it. Studios have standards for what makes an acceptable video. And if they shoot a scene that doesn't meet that criteria, they don't release it. OF has no such restrictions.
Agreed and what truly sucks is we're the ones paying the price, for OF has largely cannibalized the professional porn industry, so we're generally paying more for far lesser quality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crushed Coconut