i read them...not that i particularly needed to since i've discussed this before with Jewish friends in the past. prophecy is open to interpretation, as far as i'm concerned. he may have fulfilled some, he may not have fulfilled others. neither particularly swayed my faith in him one way or the other (which is to say it wasn't the evangelists preaching about the prophecies he DID fulfill that caused me to believe). i believe in Christ's message, i believe in his philosophy, i believe in his divinity. many Jews in that time period saw the Messiah as a figure of national liberation, a Zionist revolutionary who would eliminate all conquerors and oppressors and bring the Hebrew people back to supremacy in their land and perhaps beyond...which is why many in that time who came forward claiming to be the Messiah and preaching a message of insurrection against Rome were so popular. right up until they were executed or publicly shamed and their followers quickly deserted them. Christ's message was different. not one of physical liberation from oppression, but spiritual liberation from sin and shame. not a war of swords, but of ideas. and of all the figures claiming to be the Messiah in that time, his were the only followers to continue his message after his death, to offer their own lives up in the name of his cause. the message matters just as much if not more than the man.
if in my lifetime the Messiah comes and says "yeah, no, Jesus wasn't me...just the son of God with some awesome ideas," i'll swallow my words. :wink: or if i die and God says "you know, he really WASN'T the Messiah...it's not important now or anything, but just so you know..." then i'll gladly cede the argument. but until then, it pretty much just comes down to what you believe. which is an inherently subjective thing. the Jews have reasons not to believe. The Christians have other reasons to believe. i don't think one set is more valid than the other. hell, maybe the Hindus have had it right all along and all this talk of Messiahs is moot anyway.