Jim Carrey
- Thread starter The_One
- Start date
I saw this one several years ago. I looked at it pretty closely to see if I could see any evidence of alterations, but I could not. It could indeed be Jim Carrey from many years ago. Although I don't generally find Carrey especially attractive, that is a nice photo.
Fakey wakey.
He's got a decent build that wouldn't hide a bulge but I don't think he suffers any angst about it.
In the early 1980's he was in a Canadian TV sauna ad in which he walked around nude (I've looked - can't find that one!
He's got a decent build that wouldn't hide a bulge but I don't think he suffers any angst about it.
In the early 1980's he was in a Canadian TV sauna ad in which he walked around nude (I've looked - can't find that one!
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2005
- Posts
- 670
- Media
- 52
- Likes
- 2,169
- Points
- 748
- Location
- Miami Beach (Florida, United States)
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Well... all I know is that for years he's been rumored to be one of the Hollywood Big Boys -- if not one of the Biggest. B) All I know is what I've heard... and looking at his build, etc. I would venture to say that he's not far from the pic!
Just my 2-cents.
Just my 2-cents.
SomeGuyOverThere
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2004
- Posts
- 1,381
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 31
- Points
- 258
- Location
- Glasgow (Glasgow City, Scotland)
- Sexuality
- 60% Gay, 40% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Opinion?
Well my opnion is that the only bit of that photo that is actually Jim Carey is the head.
The head is stuck onto the body and the dick is too.
I would sermise that the dick has been blown up aswell.
So, that is more of a Frankenstein than a nude shot, and if you cant see the alterations, get glasses. Now. I can see the alterations with my glasses off.
Well my opnion is that the only bit of that photo that is actually Jim Carey is the head.
The head is stuck onto the body and the dick is too.
I would sermise that the dick has been blown up aswell.
So, that is more of a Frankenstein than a nude shot, and if you cant see the alterations, get glasses. Now. I can see the alterations with my glasses off.
I am new to this site and to the membership. I once worked for a company involved with the entertainment industry and lived in the LA area. It has been rumored for years that he is well endowed (and several actresses have alluded to it in interviews as well as men). Whether the pic is fake or not or the rumors are true or not, I will not venture to say, but, where there is smoke, you just might find a fire.
I like the photo, but wonder if it is morphed after reading the previous entries.
A few years ago I read a biography of Jim Carrey (we're both from Toronto), and the author mentioned that he is rumoured to be bigger than Milton Berle, and Carrey won't deny it.
So I've wondered about his endowment ever since, especially because of the biography's approach. The book often attempted humour, obviously because that's what Carrey does, but it was a grave mistake.
The reference to Carrey's endowment was impossible to interpret for certain. Was it another failed attempt by the author at comedy? A good author would have stuck to the facts and included the b&w Carrey photo and authenticated it.
A few years ago I read a biography of Jim Carrey (we're both from Toronto), and the author mentioned that he is rumoured to be bigger than Milton Berle, and Carrey won't deny it.
So I've wondered about his endowment ever since, especially because of the biography's approach. The book often attempted humour, obviously because that's what Carrey does, but it was a grave mistake.
The reference to Carrey's endowment was impossible to interpret for certain. Was it another failed attempt by the author at comedy? A good author would have stuck to the facts and included the b&w Carrey photo and authenticated it.
I watched "The Cable Guy" on DVD last night and in chapter six (Satellite bonding) there is possibly a very nice VPL on Carrey. He and co-star Matthew Broderick are lying (laying?) inside a large satellite dish and he shows a nice package down his left leg. I don't think it is a trouser crease.
Jim Carrey is actually really small. When he played The Riddler, there's a scene where he has a boner. He's leaning back and it's easy to see. It's tiny.
D_Gunther Snotpole
Account Disabled
Pecker said:
As a Canuck, I'd be really surprised if this were true, Pecker.
It would be a first, and a last, for Canadian TV.
You would certainly see nothing frontal.
jeff black
Expert Member
CUBE said:
It flops around more than a bit.. I can't imagine he got much stuffing done. Plus, and I know I am gonna get pounded for this, he is taller.... and he has had to use two hands in all his movies, when he gets naked.....
Jim carrey looks hung to me and remember he can be a grower....a HUGE grower!
Jim Carrey confirmed the photo to be real on the Howard Stern Show, some ten or so years ago. Stern mentioned the photo on the internet and the rumors about Carrey's size, and Carrey answered, "Yeah, it's true. I'm a handful."
I don't think anything more than that was made of it, and Stern went right to his next question.
I don't think anything more than that was made of it, and Stern went right to his next question.
Similar threads
