- Joined
- Oct 6, 2002
- Posts
- 2,021
- Media
- 10
- Likes
- 126
- Points
- 383
- Location
- Palm Springs, CA
- Sexuality
- 99% Gay, 1% Straight
- Gender
- Male
The Greens shrubbed their shoulders and treed Nader.Originally posted by MarkSavage@Jul 1 2004, 09:24 PM
Yeah, the Reform Party endorsed him. He also wanted the Greens' endorsement, but they soundly rejected him.
bush and the southern baptist conventionites are NOT talking about "protecting traditional marriage"...they are talking about re-writing the U.S. Constitution as an EXCLUSIONARY document. It was conceived by our founding fathers as an INCLUSIVE document and clearly addresses the separation of church and state. bush and the bush cartel (cheney, ashcroft, rumsfeld, rice et al) want to make the Constitution address what is actually a states rights issue. The bushies made gay marriage a wedge issue for the November election (and it is a pay back to the right wing christian zealots who put him illegally into office). Not one of our (read glbt) political or social action groups had gay marriage on any agenda or calendar as a battle to launch under the watchful eye of the bushie administration. gee, all these morals from a "man" who gleefully executed more people than any other governor in the history of the U.S. Sorry for the rant....and I could go on and discuss the graft, corruption and illegal actions by he and his cronies regarding Iraq AND the fact that they could all be tried as war criminals in the world court. But I won't....right now....I'm going to go off and talk about big peni' :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: until they don't allow it anymore.Originally posted by Tender@Jul 2 2004, 12:44 PM
but i do want a President who agrees with protecting tradional marriage.
what a mess!
Tender
I've drafted an amendment to preserve Biblical marriage:Originally posted by Tender@Jul 2 2004, 10:44 AM
but i do want a President who agrees with protecting tradional marriage.
Originally posted by Tender@Jul 3 2004, 04:17 AM
God created Adam, and he made Eve to be a wife for him.
that is one man one woman and that to me is what god intended for marriage to be. so that is defined as 'traditional marriage'.
as far as bush, i do not beleive he purposely stirred up a 'same sex' marriage scuffle in order to pressure votes.
he isnt that smart :lol:
Tender
Exactly, Tender, he isn't that smart, but may I add that his actions are guided by Karl Rove, Dick Chaney, and his hard core Republican cabinet, which makes this administration even more dangerous than his 'slow' mind.Originally posted by Tender@Jul 3 2004, 04:17 AM
as far as bush, i do not beleive he purposely stirred up a 'same sex' marriage scuffle in order to pressure votes.
he isnt that smart :lol:
Tender
Oh, a man and his transgender clone. O-kayyyy . . .Originally posted by Tender@Jul 2 2004, 08:17 PM
God created Adam, and he made Eve to be a wife for him.
that is one man one woman and that to me is what god intended for marriage to be. so that is defined as 'traditional marriage'.
having two mommies or two daddies or five wives is not the original way of marriage.
as far as bush, i do not beleive he purposely stirred up a 'same sex' marriage scuffle in order to pressure votes.
he isnt that smart :lol:
Tender
Man's also used in some cases to mean humanity in general. In the original Hebrew, it's humanity in general. If you're going to take it by English alone, God says "Let us make man in our image." Does he have a mouse on his pocket?well man = 1.
men =2.
the word man is used. when he said male and female he created THEM he is saying 1+1 =2 (one man one woman) and that = THEM.
And she would've been genetically identical to Adam, if she were made from his rib. Should I marry my twin brother, then?the "clone" aspect, is explained in that God wanted Adam's wife to be a part of him, that they were to be one.
And also because of the fiscal problems. For what? Tax cuts for the rich. The funny thing is, the American Economic Association considers supply-side roughly analogous to perpetual motion.Even many people who are 'conservitive' on ideas, will not vote for him, because of the war thing.
Well, the irony is, by making it into a constitutional amendment, he's saying that laws forbidding same-sex marriage are unconstitutional. And federal laws forbidding same-sex marriage certainly are; licensing is given to the states. (Of course, states' rights only applies to keeping those who won't vote for you out of your polls, and if you're a Republican, knowing who won't vote for you is as simple as a brown paper bag test.)otoh, i believe the majority of the nations population is against same sex marriage being legalized, and so they will vote for him because of that.