Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Women's Issues' started by linus, Jul 25, 2006.
What do the ladies think of Michelangelo"s David?
so my opinion dosent count ... damn
Maybe you could start the same poll for guys who like guys and see if there is a difference between the men and women. :smile:
I don't like his hands and feet, but I know he's only a statue, so no offense.
While I won't vote on this, fact of the matter is that many men here will not listen to your request out of either spite or stupidity (not to mention the fact that many will vote on this not paying attention through the 'random poll') ... but I am curious about this as well, I admit it.
I was just looking up Michelangelo the other day too, and was kinda taken aback at the sculptures endowment... but it makes sense I guess, any bigger and it would become the center of attention. But in terms of being the 'perfect male' (not saying that was the goal here but...) the penis does leave a bit to be desired.
Although I would probably switch my penis for his body (his made of stone one of course - then I could finally fullfill my lifelong dream of not weighing 135 pounds :biggrin1
Nah, I've always dreamed of having the penis to match the username.
That and it'd be easier than working out.
He's too white!
lol I like a little color on 'em. Gimme a dash of dark skin, a black grandma, a middle eastern father, a tan at least.
LOL...Exactly the same way i feel about women...I love an olive complexion or darker. .....just a thought...of course, when i say that, everyone says i'm a bigot...and I'm black believe it or not. go figure.
Maybe they are saying big gut. Just a thought.
I don't care for men that muscular either. :X I like a bit of (what I like to call) GRABBINS. David's too fucking skinny...he's hairless..he's PALE.....c'mon.
Always hard yet never erect. To hell with that.
Maybe David is a "grower", not a "shower".
I`d prefer a flesh penis of any size to a stone one!
Is this really a discussion about fucking a statue penis?
I think it should be mentioned that since the statue of David is so popular, that it's been so influential through the times, that one could perceive it at a perfect specimin of what a man should look like.
If that statue could talk, he'd probably ask me to fold his socks.
I very much doubt it, apart from the fact that I have never seen him wearing any.
Roman's didn't have socks did they? They were too advanced.
I love it !
In this one thread alone, you already have 3 quotables! I didnt know which one to comment on! LOL! I believe the reason behind the the teeny tiny tater tot is THE CHURCH. Anything larger would have been considered vulgar.
......and in addition to just having a little fun, this was kind of the point of the thread. David is considered the Greek ideal and has been often thought of as the perfect male form for thousands of years. Part of the Greek ideal (I believe) was to have small genitals as large ones were thought of as being grotesque. This is in contrast to other cultures which made genitals of statues very large as a mark of fertility and verility. So really I just thought the poll would be fun to see if the ladies on this board found him to be the perfect male form.