voyeurcurioso
Loved Member
Punk or not, we're finally getting proof of what's down under. Not the clearest pics of his junk, but he's almost certainly circumcised. I must say, it's larger than I expected based on all the 'Bieber is tiny' talk.
Justin Bieber
- Thread starter Bibendum01
- Start date
I want to believe those photos are real, but the lack of any sign of that cross tattoo makes me skeptical
I feel sorry for all the teenage girls seeing this and thinking it's small. They are in for a lot of dissapointment as Bieber looks to be above average
Ok boys, lets work your magic and get these pics cleaned up so we can have a cleaner look.
IDK so far pics look legit to me but who knows...and it looks like a nice size also..whether it is soft or partialed or whatever.
aqua-illusion
Legendary Member
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2005
- Posts
- 1,615
- Media
- 54
- Likes
- 2,159
- Points
- 343
- Location
- Alberta (Canada)
- Sexuality
- 50% Straight, 50% Gay
- Gender
- Male
The cross is there...just zoom in as much as you can. you can see the outline.
Daisy
Loved Member
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2009
- Posts
- 4,742
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 555
- Points
- 258
- Location
- California (United States)
- Sexuality
- No Response
- Gender
- Female
I just saw this story online. Looks suspicious. First of all he went out there knowing full well he'd be photographed so the question is....
1. Did he rub one out and then go outside with a semi trying to pass it off as a softie? OR
2. Did he stage his own photographer in the bushes to take blurry photos because frankly with zoom lenses and todays high res cameras I find it hard to believe that this is the best quality they could get
3. Did he do the above and then Photoshop the pics and "leak" them?
1. Did he rub one out and then go outside with a semi trying to pass it off as a softie? OR
2. Did he stage his own photographer in the bushes to take blurry photos because frankly with zoom lenses and todays high res cameras I find it hard to believe that this is the best quality they could get
3. Did he do the above and then Photoshop the pics and "leak" them?
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2015
- Posts
- 18
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 24
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Denver (Colorado, United States)
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
there's no way that he didn't do it on purpose. That looks like a post sex softie to me. He got laid and walked outside knowing that he looked good. Tell a 21 year old that you think that his dick is small enough times and he's bound to whip it out
a-crazed-hobo
Loved Member
The earliest pic I could find of him having said tattoo was posted on January 30, 2014. So perhaps these pics are from before then.
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2015
- Posts
- 18
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 24
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Denver (Colorado, United States)
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Some perspective. First off, he totally did this on purpose. Second, that's a semi. Third, he's 5'6" and maybe 130lbs. That's what an average penis looks like on a small frame when fluffed. Nothing to be ashamed of for sure.
He's 5'9 .. Not skinny avg body and is uncut and soft in those pics looks about 5 soft I bet 7.5-8 hard 5.5-5.75 thick.. My opinion he got a big dick
Do you believe everything you read online? Stars notoriously lie about their height. Believe me, the Biebs is 5'6" maybe 5'7" max. Definitely a skinny body type. Definitely not totally soft in the photos. Could still have a big dick hard, but I'm telling you, his small frame is skewing perception.
BritS
Expert Member
I like what I see and he looks uncut to me. Still want more clearer pics though.
I'm glad the suspense if finally over. Now we see it. It is a penis and not a vagina. He has nothing to be ashamed of and life can go on for the rest of humanity.
