MODS: If this is the wrong place for this kind of thing, please re-locate I've been wondering, would you choose a guy with the mythical perfect 8" x 6", who was average in looks, over a guy who was 7" x 5" with Brad Pitt style good looks? Of course Brad Pitt isnt everyones ideal, but basically imagine your literally perfect, ideal guy (looks wise), with a 7" x 5". OR the most average, "just about good looking enough for you" guy, with an 8" x 6". And I do know that 7" x 5" isn't "average" when it comes to length, but on a site like this, the real average of 5.75" x 4.75" would just be instantly shot down. So the real question is: do good looks with a decent size beat average looks with a massive size?