Ladies, don't you just love it when...

[Trouty]

...you see a thread starting with the title "Ladies..."

These always make me smile :biggrin1:

 

[B_Think_Kink]

No, because it's usually a post from the men..

 

[ManlyBanisters]

Hum - yes, but it is better than 'womangz' or whatever the fuck

 

[polesmoker]

Damn, I once started a thread with the word ladies.

 

[canuck_pa]

I hope I don't offend anyone but there's an old saying my great aunt used to say when being called a lady was a complement.

"Although all ladies are women, not all women are ladies."

 

[las000005]

What do you want us to use instead of ladies? Cunts?

 

[ManlyBanisters]

What's your fucking problem?

No one said 'Don't start thread titles with "Ladies"!'

Anyway - 'Cunts' could easily be used to address both men and women and is not a reasonable substitute for 'Ladies', 'Women', 'Girls' or any female specific nomenclature.

 

[poizen-ivy]

What do you want us to use instead of ladies? Cunts?

Congrats! You probably just offended a large number of the women on LPSG. :smashfreakB:

 

[ManlyBanisters]

I'm not in the least offended by his childish wibbling. Attempts to offend very rarely succeed with me.

 

[Trouty]

What do you want us to use instead of ladies? Cunts?

Whhhoooooosssssshhhhh

 

[ZOS23xy]

I'm not in the least offended by his childish wibbling. Attempts to offend very rarely succeed with me.

That's cause no one has called you a refused maggot infested piece of pork yet.

So I certainly won't.

I don't think the OP understand how to insult women as a group, or he hasn't been dipping into their teabags.

 

[Trouty]

That's cause no one has called you a refused maggot infested piece of pork yet.

So I certainly won't.

I don't think the OP understand how to insult women as a group, or he hasn't been dipping into their teabags.

Speaking as the OP I can assure I am more than capable of insulting women as a group or as individuals (I just chose not to as I know when I'm on to a loser :biggrin1. The point of this thread was that I find it tedious when I see inane posts starting "Ladies..." followed by some dumbass question. I can only imagine what the women/ladies on this site think since I actually consider them to be the most sensible/intelligent contributors to this site.

 

[ZOS23xy]

And the whole point of this thread is...? How clever you aren't?

 

[MASSIVEPKGO_CHUCK]

Well, I suppose there are a few other adjectives to describe the women here, however, they tend to lean towards descriptive, and if not deprecating.
And I personally find any others not ones I'd use to address my fellow female members/posters/friends here or any other place.

 

[ScorpioSlut]

And the whole point of this thread is...? How clever you aren't?

I think the whole point of this thread is that las0000005 needs to find somewhere else to post because we're tired of his redundant posts....


Ladies....do you (insert dumbass question here)?????????

 

[ManlyBanisters]

Well, I suppose there are a few other adjectives to describe the women here, however, they tend to lean towards descriptive, and if not deprecating.
And I personally find any others not ones I'd use to address my fellow female members/posters/friends here or any other place.

'Ladies' is not an adjective. It's a noun.

 

[Trouty]

I think the whole point of this thread is that las0000005 needs to find somewhere else to post because we're tired of his redundant posts....


Ladies....do you (insert dumbass question here)?????????

Nail firmly hit on the head. Although I wouldn't single out las00000000005 as there seem to be plenty of others who start such threads (which now ironically includes me )

 

[poizen-ivy]

'Ladies' is not an adjective. It's a noun.

I <3 U. :biggrin1:

 

[MASSIVEPKGO_CHUCK]

'Ladies' is not an adjective. It's a noun.

Depends on which ones you're talking about.:kiss:

 

[ManlyBanisters]

Depends on which ones you're talking about.:kiss:

No, it doesn't, Chuck. We're talking basic grammar here - you understand what a noun is, don't you?