Ladies, how are we supposed to know the size queens when we see them?

[petite]

Not knowing you personally, I can't give you a good answer.

What your saying may be true, false or only true from a certain point of view. The point is, I don't know because I've never met you.

I've never personally met a woman who was in her thirties, still single and not defective in some manner.

Since you believe that at the age of 30, an unmarried woman is magically transformed into a defect, like Cinderella at midnight, I'm not sure that you'll listen to my defective opinions...

Have you considered that not everyone sees the world the way that you do, so they don't make choices based on the motivations you assume they have? Have you considered that there are 9 Enneagram Personality Types and 16 Myers-Briggs Personality Types and each different type of person will react differently in the same situation, will desire different things, handle their problems differently, be motivated by different factors, and probably each have a different outcome in the same situation?

You make these sweeping generalizations and you appear to believe they apply to everyone, no exceptions. You seem to think there is only one personality type in the world.

 

[wallyj84]

Since you believe that at the age of 30, an unmarried woman is magically transformed into a defect, like Cinderella at midnight, I'm not sure that you'll listen to my defective opinions...

I never said that defective people couldn't have valid opinions. Please don't twist my statements around to make them mean something that they do not.

Have you considered that not everyone sees the world the way that you do, so they don't make choices based on the motivations you assume they have? Have you considered that there are 9 Enneagram Personality Types and 16 Myers-Briggs Personality Types and each different type of person will react differently in the same situation, will desire different things, handle their problems differently, be motivated by different factors, and probably each have a different outcome in the same situation?

You make these sweeping generalizations and you appear to believe they apply to everyone, no exceptions. You seem to think there is only one personality type in the world.

Have you ever owned a dog? There are many different kinds of dogs and each dog has its own personality. I've had dogs that are very relaxed and others that are always excited. Now these dogs have different personalities, but the basic structure of how they interact with each other remains the same. Dogs have a social hierarchy with rules and structure. Those dogs that can't fit into this hierarchy are defective in the way they interact with others.

People are the same way. We each have a distinct personality, but it exists in a social framework with its own rules and structure. Those who cannot conform to those rules are defective. Unlike dogs, generally speaking, defective people are not be destroyed. Our social systems are complex and strong enough to support a number of defectives without bringing harm to the whole of society, but that doesn't change the fact that these people are still defective.

 

[B_ILIW]

hierarchy exists, but i think in humans, there are no rules. a comparison to dogs makes little sense, since humans are sapient beings, dogs are not. we are more complex, both individually and collectively.

i think goals/desires are relative. everything in life is.

 

[petite]

Wally, I'm glad that you feel that I may have valid points, even though you implied that I am either a liar or possibly delusional. I don't mind if you believe either one about me, it doesn't bother me. Since you have defined people who are "defective" as people who do not conform to society's rules and structure, and as people who may have the potential to bring down our entire society, I am honored to be considered a defective person.

I have been reading your posts for weeks. This is not the first time you have expressed your opinions on the importance of a high societal standing. I have read before your own opinions of your own perception of your position in society. I sincerely wish that you did not see the world this way. I don't believe it's an accurate representation of reality, and I don't believe these beliefs will ever make you happy.

I know how deep and sincere your beliefs are, I have noticed how often and vigorously you defend them and I appreciate that you are honest here, although you are much too harsh on yourself and others.

I can only say that this is something that I do not believe you and I will ever see eye-to-eye upon, and I don't believe in pushing my beliefs on others if it seems that the effort will be moot, especially because I feel that you are very adamant about your beliefs. It only serves to make both sides more stubborn and frustrated rather than more open-minded. I would like to avoid all of that unpleasantness. I understand the point that you have been making all these weeks, I just don't share your beliefs.

 

[wallyj84]

hierarchy exists, but i think in humans, there are no rules. a comparison to dogs makes little sense, since humans are sapient beings, dogs are not. we are more complex, both individually and collectively.

i think goals/desires are relative. everything in life is.

That's ridiculous. There are tons of rules that govern human social interaction.

 

[wallyj84]

Wally, I'm glad that you feel that I may have valid points, even though you implied that I am either a liar or possibly delusional. I don't mind if you believe either one about me, it doesn't bother me. Since you have defined people who are "defective" as people who do not conform to society's rules and structure, and as people who may have the potential to bring down our entire society, I am honored to be considered a defective person.

I have been reading your posts for weeks. This is not the first time you have expressed your opinions on the importance of a high societal standing. I have read before your own opinions of your own perception of your position in society. I sincerely wish that you did not see the world this way. I don't believe it's an accurate representation of reality, and I don't believe these beliefs will ever make you happy.

I know how deep and sincere your beliefs are, I have noticed how often and vigorously you defend them and I appreciate that you are honest here, although you are much too harsh on yourself and others.

I can only say that this is something that I do not believe you and I will ever see eye-to-eye upon, and I don't believe in pushing my beliefs on others if it seems that the effort will be moot, especially because I feel that you are very adamant about your beliefs. It only serves to make both sides more stubborn and frustrated rather than more open-minded. I would like to avoid all of that unpleasantness. I understand the point that you have been making all these weeks, I just don't share your beliefs.

Fair enough.

By the way, I apologize if I came off as saying that you were lying or delusional. That was not my intention.

 

[petite]

Fair enough.

By the way, I apologize if I came off as saying that you were lying or delusional. That was not my intention.

Thank you, Wally! That was nice of you to say.

 

[Lou Pole]

Exactly, this is why I don't think that divorce will heavily impact the number of "good" men on the market, because most divorces are between either two defective people or one average/mid-status person and a defective person. Good, and by that I mean high status people, generally don't marry defective people.

Wow -- that's a really skewed view of relationships.

Mots of my divorced friends aren't defective. Most often, they married young, grew up, and realized that what they wanted at 19 is not what they want at 35.

 

[wallyj84]

Wow -- that's a really skewed view of relationships.

Mots of my divorced friends aren't defective. Most often, they married young, grew up, and realized that what they wanted at 19 is not what they want at 35.

We have very different experiences then.

From what I've seen, my friends who married early were immature/stupid and got married without considering all of the consequences.

To put it simply, they married because they were defective.

 

[OCMuscleJock]

hehe you'll know a true size queen when they are either complaining that they cannot find a guy big enough...OR if they are walking funny with a big smile on their face.

 

[B_crackoff]

Exactly, this is why I don't think that divorce will heavily impact the number of "good" men on the market, because most divorces are between either two defective people or one average/mid-status person and a defective person. Good, and by that I mean high status people, generally don't marry defective people.

Paul McCartney! Mrs Tiger Woods.

 

[wallyj84]

Paul McCartney! Mrs Tiger Woods.

Hmm, I don't know anything about Paul McCartney, but I can't think of anything that was defective with Mrs. Woods. Sure she went a little bit crazy after she found out her husband was a man-whore, but I felt that was understandable.

In my mind, cheating on your spouse is unforgivable, so I can really understand her reaction.

 

[TheScotsman]

I suppose if a woman cares about size that much, she'll probably bring it up herself anyway. Otherwise I don't know how the hell you'd know about it, since I'm pretty blind to body language in the first place.

 

[petite]

Scotsman, you just made me realize that I never answered the OP's question, did I?

I'm going to say that I don't think you can tell. Seeing as how I don't even know which ones of my own friends are size queens, if any of them are size queens, and that leads me to believe that you won't be able to tell either.

 

[Ramrod60]

I have found from my own experiences that there are several different types of size queens. They range from the quiet and shy types who blush when you catch them looking at your crotch to the bold and brazen ones who will come right out and ask you what you're packing. Some are easy to spot (I'm the blue jean type).

Personally, I have always loved the innocent ones (who have only ever seen average before me), and that initial "omg" reaction along with the "you've ruined me on small dicks forever." Knowing that I was somewhat responsible in turning someone into a sizequeen has always given me a feeling of accomplishment!

 

[ZachMorris]

How about you just ask, if it is important to you. Say, "Hey, my name is (name). I would like to ask you out for coffee and a big penis, but only if you like both."

 

[Sergeant_Torpedo]

Back to the original question.
By the unicorn like dick protruding from her forehead?

 

[pcghabsy]

Yeah, a true sizequeen (whoever they are) will probably make it clear right off the bat that "I can't be with a man who doesn't have a big cock. So if you don't have a big cock, I am sorry its not going to work out"

If not then, it'll be clear when they first have sex, which could be embarrassing for both.

Of course, I don't think there are very many woman who would pick an asshole with a big cock over a guy they like otherwise with a decent sized cock.

 

[kit_kat]

you can also marry a great guy who happens to have a big dick and that's my hope...some day!

Me too! I'd like to meet a great guy who also happens to have a big dick!

 

[kit_kat]

That's ridiculous. Poor men are significantly easier to find and marry than rich men.

I think the realistic chances of marrying a good man with a large dick go down significantly as you get older and move into different age groups. This is because good men with large dicks are scooped up almost immediately as they get on the market. The only ones left are those that are defective in some manner. For example, they might have a big dick, but are poor and bad with money.

Hey, that's exactly the same thing that jerks say about nice guys and that ugly guys say about good looking guys.

People without some perceived socially desirable trait will try to make it look as though you either can't get someone with that socially desirable trait for whatever made-up reason or someone with that trait has something else wrong with them.

We should know this trick by now.