a theory that has been bouncing around inside my head:
if a guy is good-looking (has a handsome face, a hot body), intercourse will not be highly satisfying for either himself or the woman UNLESS he has a big dick, because his good looks will have the woman so aroused that she will be very wet and "tented", such that only a big cock will provide the "tight fit" that satisfies both of them.
conversely, if a guy iis not very attractive, it is better for him and his woman if his dick isn't big, because his partner will not be very aroused, such that a big dick will be difficult, if not impossible, to fit in, whereas a smaller penis will fit nicely.
ladies, does this make any sense?
if a guy is good-looking (has a handsome face, a hot body), intercourse will not be highly satisfying for either himself or the woman UNLESS he has a big dick, because his good looks will have the woman so aroused that she will be very wet and "tented", such that only a big cock will provide the "tight fit" that satisfies both of them.
conversely, if a guy iis not very attractive, it is better for him and his woman if his dick isn't big, because his partner will not be very aroused, such that a big dick will be difficult, if not impossible, to fit in, whereas a smaller penis will fit nicely.
ladies, does this make any sense?