Ladys M I Avg. Or Below Avg.

Discussion in 'Women's Issues' started by 4incher, May 26, 2007.

  1. 4incher

    4incher New Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    2
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    philadelphia
    Im 4 And A Quarter Hard 2 Inches Soft ,ladys Rate My Penis.
     
  2. agnslz

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    4,778
    Likes Received:
    14
    I'm not a lady, but I'd say you're below average.
     
  3. B_Rivas_Boricua4Ever

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2007
    Messages:
    608
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Connecticut
    That's pretty damn small...:frown1:
     
  4. Principessa

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2006
    Messages:
    19,494
    Likes Received:
    28
    Gender:
    Female
    Since you have not posted a pic I can't accurately rate what I can't see; however from your description I would have to say you are below average.

    0 - 2 = microb
    2 - 2.75 = mini
    2.75 - 4.5 = small
    4.75 - 5.75 = isn't that cute
    6.00- 7.00 = average
    7.25 - 7.75 = above average
    8.00 - 8.75 = big
    9.00 - 9.75= cervix pounder
    10+ Porn Star

    4incher, why are you asking this question on the Large Penis Support Group site? Are you seeking small penis humiliation? I'm probably the only one here who is tired of this but isn't www.measurection.com
    better suited to your needs.
     
  5. chavous

    chavous New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2006
    Messages:
    759
    Likes Received:
    15
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Georgia
    I So -----agree With Njgt466. Just Ignore These Dumb Questions And They Will Go Away (i Hope)!!
     
  6. D_golden parachute

    D_golden parachute New Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2007
    Messages:
    915
    Likes Received:
    0
    People overestimate average

    5.5 is average not 7...
     
  7. Long&Thick

    Long&Thick New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2006
    Messages:
    276
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    IF that is the fully erect state of your member, then yes your below average. Try cutting down your forest and take a few more photos from different angles, you've posted once before..it can't be that hard to put up more photos :)
     
  8. IntoxicatingToxin

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    10,133
    Likes Received:
    152
    I think that's what SHE considers average... not what the REAL average is.
     
  9. DeeDee36dd

    DeeDee36dd New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    3
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    Santa Fe, NM
    Well, according to all the statistics I've seen recently...5.5" is the average length.
     
  10. Snakebyte

    Verified Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2005
    Messages:
    7,320
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    452
    Verified:
    Photo
    I don't get guys asking such questions
    But since the thread is already started:

    Ladies am I below average or just freaking small?
     
  11. HazelGod

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2006
    Messages:
    7,531
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    9
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    The Other Side of the Pillow
    Based on the subject and quality of this post, I rate both your wang and your intelligence in the same general category.
     
  12. transformer_99

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2006
    Messages:
    2,466
    Likes Received:
    1
    Gender:
    Male
    "People overestimate average 5.5 is average not 7..."

    "I think that's what SHE considers average... not what the REAL average is."


    "Well, according to all the statistics I've seen recently...5.5" is the average length."


    Yes, definitely, trust the measurements and the computations a calculator or computer makes. There are 2 levels of statistics, sample and population, neither of which measures every unit in the universe. That said, do you include John Holmes or not, there's a measurement that is the upper limit outlier, is it included or not ? It's a dead penis, but a measurement that could be obtained just the same ? The means, medians and standard deviations infer measures within tolerances/confidence intervals for the universe. Then when you consider that every penis on the planet is at a different stage of development, what is really the average of anything ?

    So in the end, the penis is what it is @ any given moment in life and stop worrying about the size of it. If it makes you feel good and provides a measure of euphoric satisfaction that is appreciated beyond the current level of enjoment in life for yourself or someone else, that is the positive to take forward on any size of penis. Same holds for women's dimensions.

    The other day, it was funny, I was involved in a discussion that was irrelevant to size, it had more to do with each woman's level of selectivity of a mate. You'd be surprised how many get disqualified long before endowments are even put on the table for consideration. With some of the women involved in that discussion, many men have been rejected starting with the utterance of a simple, good morning. The mating game was never an option. But it's also a double edged sword/two way street. Many women are disqualified as well. Just or unjust, that is what it is too.
     
  13. LemacST

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    1,096
    Likes Received:
    3
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Ca
    I love you.


    And yeah, seems like size is the last stop on the rejection train...if you can survive what comes before it, you're very often still in the game no matter what your size is.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted