Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Women's Issues' started by 4incher, May 26, 2007.
Im 4 And A Quarter Hard 2 Inches Soft ,ladys Rate My Penis.
I'm not a lady, but I'd say you're below average.
That's pretty damn small...:frown1:
Since you have not posted a pic I can't accurately rate what I can't see; however from your description I would have to say you are below average.
0 - 2 = microb
2 - 2.75 = mini
2.75 - 4.5 = small
4.75 - 5.75 = isn't that cute
6.00- 7.00 = average
7.25 - 7.75 = above average
8.00 - 8.75 = big
9.00 - 9.75= cervix pounder
10+ Porn Star
4incher, why are you asking this question on the Large Penis Support Group site? Are you seeking small penis humiliation? I'm probably the only one here who is tired of this but isn't www.measurection.com better suited to your needs.
I So -----agree With Njgt466. Just Ignore These Dumb Questions And They Will Go Away (i Hope)!!
People overestimate average
5.5 is average not 7...
IF that is the fully erect state of your member, then yes your below average. Try cutting down your forest and take a few more photos from different angles, you've posted once before..it can't be that hard to put up more photos
I think that's what SHE considers average... not what the REAL average is.
Well, according to all the statistics I've seen recently...5.5" is the average length.
I don't get guys asking such questions
But since the thread is already started:
Ladies am I below average or just freaking small?
Based on the subject and quality of this post, I rate both your wang and your intelligence in the same general category.
"People overestimate average 5.5 is average not 7..."
"I think that's what SHE considers average... not what the REAL average is."
"Well, according to all the statistics I've seen recently...5.5" is the average length."
Yes, definitely, trust the measurements and the computations a calculator or computer makes. There are 2 levels of statistics, sample and population, neither of which measures every unit in the universe. That said, do you include John Holmes or not, there's a measurement that is the upper limit outlier, is it included or not ? It's a dead penis, but a measurement that could be obtained just the same ? The means, medians and standard deviations infer measures within tolerances/confidence intervals for the universe. Then when you consider that every penis on the planet is at a different stage of development, what is really the average of anything ?
So in the end, the penis is what it is @ any given moment in life and stop worrying about the size of it. If it makes you feel good and provides a measure of euphoric satisfaction that is appreciated beyond the current level of enjoment in life for yourself or someone else, that is the positive to take forward on any size of penis. Same holds for women's dimensions.
The other day, it was funny, I was involved in a discussion that was irrelevant to size, it had more to do with each woman's level of selectivity of a mate. You'd be surprised how many get disqualified long before endowments are even put on the table for consideration. With some of the women involved in that discussion, many men have been rejected starting with the utterance of a simple, good morning. The mating game was never an option. But it's also a double edged sword/two way street. Many women are disqualified as well. Just or unjust, that is what it is too.
I love you.
And yeah, seems like size is the last stop on the rejection train...if you can survive what comes before it, you're very often still in the game no matter what your size is.