GOSH its not internet a fact is a fact no matter wherever it is printed. IF the world didn't believe internet there would be no YOUTUBE right ??
large penis is it just a physiological win or ignorance of simple medical facts?
- Thread starter asadz
- Start date
GOSH its not internet a fact is a fact no matter wherever it is printed. IF the world didn't believe internet there would be no YOUTUBE right ??
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2010
- Posts
- 75,494
- Media
- 1,539
- Likes
- 108,284
- Points
- 393
- Location
- Austin, Texas, US
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- No Response
- Gender
- Male
Do you realize, wow, a man can make a woman orgasm without a penis? Do you realize that a women can make herself orgasm without a man? Do you realize that this site is for a subset of society? Do you realize we don't need you to tell us that many women can be satisfied by almost any size penis? Do you realize that is not what this site is about? We don't need you telling us about ourselves. You go back to anatomy class and just let us alone. You learn about the female anatomy from books; I'll learn it from women. Women don't come (cum) with a manual; you learn by listening to them, whether its moans, groans or suggestions. But you keep reading.
Last edited:
Oh for god's sake, have actual sex with a woman and explore her vagina, don't read poorly worded pages about female anatomy with simplistic drawings! 
Or, you know, actually listen to women? There's an entire forum here that is very educational.
YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!
Or, you know, actually listen to women? There's an entire forum here that is very educational.
YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!
Last edited:
Oh for god's sake, have actual sex with a woman and explore her vagina, don't read poorly worded pages about female anatomy with simplistic drawings!
Or, you know, actually listen to women? There's an entire forum here that is very educational.
YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!
and yeah for some nothing can be more fearful than the fear of truth. Live in scare <3 and keep hiding. Honestly speaking exploring ones women vagina is no fun and interesting compared to exploring ones women ignorance. The latter is whole lotta fun. Take cares<3
Last edited:
What the hell are you talking about? Afraid of believing that my cervix is the "roof" of my vagina and it has no nerves? You are an idiot.
Instead of focusing on the parts of your argument that actually do make sense, you've spent two pages saying ignorant things about the female anatomy and arguing with possibly the only person who agrees with at least some of your premises.
Last edited:
I don't think i have anything more left to say to you. Seriously you are hopeless. Take care<3
I'm not saying he is correct on everything, but what you're saying is definitely wrong. I don't know if you're trying to play a game of semantics, but the cervix is at the top end of the vagina, or "the roof".
Cervix - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - "The cervix (or neck of the uterus) is the lower, narrow portion of the uterus where it joins with the top end of the vagina. It is cylindrical or conical in shape and protrudes through the upper anterior vaginal wall."
The Vagina | LIVESTRONG.COM - "At the top of the vagina is what feels like a semi-hard round ball. This is your cervix, the 'neck' of your uterus."
Or you can look at the link he provided.
Yeah, only if you take what he wrote out of context.
I think that he's playing a game of semantics because without looking at his link (that he provided later) and reading the context of how he used the term "roof" in the first post that he used it in, he implied that he meant that the cervix is at the end of the vagina.
First of all, it's only the "top" when looking at the diagram or if she's in missionary position. It's the "bottom" when she's in doggy style, and the "front" when she's standing up, and which you don't need to tell me or show me a diagram to "prove" since I have a vagina.
And if that's what he really meant, then that doesn't make any sense in the context of how he was using the word in his post since it occupies so little real estate in the entire vagina and it has nothing to do with large cocks. It no longer makes sense the way he's ranting about 10" cocks! IF the cervix were as without feeling as he claims, the fact that an area on one side (a more accurate description) of the vagina has less feeling than the rest of the vagina would be meaningless in the context of his overall argument about whether or not it feels anything when big cocks touch it. (My own cervix is only 2.75" inside my vagina. I'm almost all cul-de-sac! Obviously ALL penises touch mine, and keeping that fact in mind while reading his rant about 10" cocks makes him look like an ignorant fool.) His entire point was that he doesn't believe that it's sensitive (tell that to a woman!) and that since it's at the back where a big cock would hit it, that the fact that it's "without feeling" means that we don't need big cocks. How does that reasoning NOT imply that he meant that the cervix is at the very back end of the vagina?
Last edited:
Where can we begin to find a link in your 3300 + posts?:biggrin1:
I think we are all arguing over non sense. A large penis is what it is.....
Visually stimulating (at most, so people love to look at them), just another fetish if you ask me:smile:
Good grief, it's probably in the top 3 of things I talk about in the women's issues forum! At least it seems like it.
I agree with you that a large cock is visually stimulating. I prefer looking at a larger one, too.
However, there are some women who do prefer the feeling of a large cock and some of them are members of this site, and I believe them when they say that they prefer one for their sexual satisfaction. I personally believe that they're probably in the minority, and I have many reasons for believing so. If the OP had stopped being making ignorant proclamations about what women can and cannot feel with their vaginas and explored the other parts of his argument, or possibly even, I don't know, asked me what I agreed with him about or why I agree with him, then I would have shared and we could have talked about that, but no, he's just another ignorant guy on here telling women what they're supposed to think, because even though he doesn't have a vagina, he knows what it's like to have one better than we do.
Here is a diagram showing how the vagina extends past the cervix; the cervix is not at the top or the end of the vagina.Female Genitals
Also avail yourself of the information provided at http://www.lpsg.org/209403-anterior-or-posterior-fornix.html
There is also a definition clearly stating that the cervix is not at the end of the vagina but atop or on the roof of the vagina
Also avail yourself of the information provided at http://www.lpsg.org/209403-anterior-or-posterior-fornix.html
There is also a definition clearly stating that the cervix is not at the end of the vagina but atop or on the roof of the vagina
Last edited:
Here is a diagram showing how the vagina extends past the cervix; the cervix is not at the top or the end of the vagina.Female Genitals
Also avail yourself of the information provided at Anterior or posterior fornix?
ummm yea ,,,, after the cervix is the uterus....You might want to avail yourself of some diagram reading skills.
Also avail yourself of the information provided at Anterior or posterior fornix?
ummm yea ,,,, after the cervix is the uterus....You might want to avail yourself of some diagram reading skills.
The uterus isn't itself a part of the vagina outside of where the cervix connects. The Pouch of Douglas is "past" the cervix inside the vagina. It's also called the cul-de-sac.
Good grief, do I need to find the LPSG-er who is a gynecologist to clear this all up? We've had discussions about all this stuff because I consulted him about some of our genital incompatibility issues that brought me to LPSG.
Oh yeah, also, I have a vagina! And when I'm having sex, I can feel his cock go past my cervix into this really cool area of my vagina made for it. It was only since joining LPSG that I learned what that area was actually called, but I've known it was there, because I have nerves inside my vagina.
Last edited:
Pouch of Douglas definition - Medical Dictionary definitions of popular medical terms easily defined on MedTerms
now,,, i know more than i needed too.
And yes----i have a vagina.
Nice that they're naming them after streets, now. Sweet touch
My boyfriend will be please to enter my cul-de-sac
now,,, i know more than i needed too.
And yes----i have a vagina.
Nice that they're naming them after streets, now. Sweet touch
My boyfriend will be please to enter my cul-de-sac
Similar threads
