LARGEST "MEMBER"?

[B_DoubleMeatWhopper]

Originally posted by hung9mike@Jul 31 2004, 01:44 AM
Before I respond to this poll, I was wondering. What premium should I add to my actual size? Is it a percentage of my actual size or just a fixed amount? Just wondering, since it seems to be in vogue on LPSG. Thanks.

Round it off to the nearest quarter inch. You see all these guys who report their size as X.2 or X.7, etc., which begs the question, where did they find a tape measure marked in tenths of an inch? Maybe they used a draftmen's rule?

 

[jonb]

Originally posted by DoubleMeatWhopper+Aug 1 2004, 12:37 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (DoubleMeatWhopper @ Aug 1 2004, 12:37 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-hung9mike@Jul 31 2004, 01:44 AM
Before I respond to this poll, I was wondering. What premium should I add to my actual size? Is it a percentage of my actual size or just a fixed amount? Just wondering, since it seems to be in vogue on LPSG. Thanks.

Round it off to the nearest quarter inch. You see all these guys who report their size as X.2 or X.7, etc., which begs the question, where did they find a tape measure marked in tenths of an inch? Maybe they used a draftmen&#39;s rule? [/b][/quote]
Maybe they mean centimeters.

Jon (A mere .00000000000000000864 parsecs or a huge 2670000000 Angstroms)

 

[Donk]

Originally posted by DoubleMeatWhopper@Aug 1 2004, 08:37 PM

Round it off to the nearest quarter inch. You see all these guys who report their size as X.2 or X.7, etc., which begs the question, where did they find a tape measure marked in tenths of an inch? Maybe they used a draftmen&#39;s rule?

I have long had the theory that these guys reporting "tenths" of an inch are actually reading the sixteenths marks on a ruler/tape. I agree that a quarter inch is the smallest increment worth reporting. I suspect it&#39;s very common for one man&#39;s erect length to vary as much as a half inch here or there anyway. In my own experience, I have measured my erection at as much as 11.5" (or even a little over) and as little as 10.5", but I see no reason to report anything more precise than the 11" length at which it normally hovers.

 

[madame_zora]

Originally posted by jonb@Jul 30 2004, 09:30 PM
Should we serve them with lobster thermidor aux crevettes in a mornay sauce garnished with truffle pate, brandy, and a fried egg then? I&#39;m suwe madame_zowa will agwee with me?

Depends Jon, are you gonna be the chef?

 

[txquis]

I cant be in the largest member poll
since my pole is not anywhere near the largest.
i&#39;m in that 7 range that is never part of the voting.


Monstro (who also went by awellhungboi) is one
of the bigger ones i know about on here.

 

[Mr._dB]

Originally posted by DoubleMeatWhopper@Aug 1 2004, 08:37 PM

Round it off to the nearest quarter inch. You see all these guys who report their size as X.2 or X.7, etc., which begs the question, where did they find a tape measure marked in tenths of an inch? Maybe they used a draftmen&#39;s rule?

My tape measure has fractions on one side, and 10ths + metric on the other.

But it&#39;s easier for me to say I&#39;m 11" long than 10 127/128ths.

If I grab my foreskin and pull it past my glans, I can add another inch-and-a-half to that, does that count?

 

[KinkGuy]

That&#39;s an unfair advantage to us clipped dicks. You can use your skin if I can use my ball bag.

 

[Ineligible]

When we used to use inches here my school ruler was marked in tenths on one side. But I think many people who use tenths are measuring in centimetres and converting. In much of the world a metric scale is all you&#39;d be likely to find easily, so you use that, and divide by 2.54 to make the answer traditional, and intelligible to Americans. It&#39;s then a lot simpler to round to one decimal place than to round to the nearest 1/4", and it&#39;s easier to type, say, 7.2" than 7 1/4" or 7.25" or 7¼".

 

[13788]

TripodMillenium: Hehehe....


Looks like you found something that could be it.....


But, one would have to be cleaver to have your job, no?

 

[MASSIVEPKGO_CHUCK]

Well, if you&#39;re talking in terms of physical endowment, unsure right now. Now if you&#39;re talking about personalities, HHSO or Extremely-huge are in this category, but I think our favorite netherlands nitwit, ROBERT also is a candidate.

 

[marvel]

latgest members huh?
well at least alot of the faker are gone
but how has the biggest member (i waana see that) :lol:

 

[Duo187]

I am glad it aint me... lol. Attention is bad lol.

 

[Adam875]

I don&#39;t know whether to be encouraged or not. It seems that almost 50% are in the 8" range which, being in that myself, I have always considered very modest (even ineligible) in lpsg terms. OK, the &#39;average&#39; is supposed to be around 6", so I may be a bit large by that reckoning, but I would have thought that "serious" lpsg membership ought to start at 9" at least.

 

[KinkGuy]

Originally posted by Adam875@Aug 16 2004, 11:48 AM
but I would have thought that "serious" lpsg membership ought to start at 9" at least.

Well, it&#39;s been nice knowing everyone. I guess I have to go now. h34r:

 

[lapdog2001]

Originally posted by Adam875@Aug 16 2004, 05:48 PM
I don&#39;t know whether to be encouraged or not. It seems that almost 50% are in the 8" range which, being in that myself, I have always considered very modest (even ineligible) in lpsg terms. OK, the &#39;average&#39; is supposed to be around 6", so I may be a bit large by that reckoning, but I would have thought that "serious" lpsg membership ought to start at 9" at least.

Average length in scientific studies is between 5 and 6 inches. Average on LPSG is very likely higher just by the very nature of the group. The name isn&#39;t the Enormous Penis Support Group, but Large PSG. I would say that anyone 6 inches or over &#39;qualifies&#39; for the group.

But as it has been mentioned over and over, there are no qualifications needed to be a member of this group.

All are welcome.

LapDog2001

 

[13788]

palladen: Ditto what Duo and LD said: the wrong kind of attention can be a bad thing. Anything above 6 sounds about right. Anything above 9 should be considered enormous, but this is a support group after all

p

 

[13788]

NikkiSixx: There oughta be an option for people under 8"...like my 6.5" one...

 

[B_Robert Fish]

I also would appreciate a response for those well over 12"&#33; I am working on a
project, and ANYONE who emails me, can assure TOTAL confidential treatment&#33;
Thank You&#33;

PS: For those who contribute, I know exactly how you feel, REALLY&#33;

Thank You&#33;

 

[lapdog2001]

Originally posted by NikkiSixx@Aug 22 2004, 11:34 PM
There oughta be an option for people under 8"...like my 6.5" one...

Nikki,

Anything above 6 is above average, so consider yourself large. B)

Again, as far as I can tell, and as far as I&#39;m concerned, all are welcome here:
men, women, straight, gay, bi, and all combinations of the above.

LapDog2001

 

[13788]

iamout: Only 7.0 cut here, but the head is of medium size. Egg sized nads as another member put it.

It fares its usage as I am addicted to jack off with plenty of sperm with each jack off.

Chad

ICQ # 296613791