- Joined
- Nov 19, 2004
- Posts
- 5,842
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 2,611
- Points
- 333
- Location
- Memphis (Tennessee, United States)
- Gender
- Male
Thanks for your wonderful essay on this subject. It has been too long since I studied this to remember the details, but you confirmed what I said and thank you. I was hoping that you would have an opportunity to explain this. You did such a better job then I did.
My prayer is that under the new Pope, liturgical Protestants and Catholics can completely heal the schism that happend in the Protestant Reformation. I know that in the Methodist Church you can receive the Sacrament and I have Catholic relatives that have received Holy Communion in our Methodist Church. But my Catholic friends tell me that I can go to the front and receive a blessing from the priest, but I can't take Holy Communion unless I am Cathoic or Orthodox. But then I have another friend who is Catholic who says that yes Protestants can take Holy Communion. I know you can clarify this point for me.
Another point. It is my understanding from what I was taught that the position of Patriarch of Antioch is vacant as the city was never rebuilt. It is also my understanding that there are several patriarchs in Jerusalem all idenified with other churches. As in there is a Latin Patriarch which is Roman Cathoic, an Orthodox Patriarch, a Coptic Patriarch and I think some others. Whem tje Holy Land was taken over by the Muslims the Christian Church there suffered and Jerusalme lsot its itendity as a separate chruch with its own unique Patriarch.
In closing, Jacinto, my prayers are with you and all Christians, especially Cahtolic Christians. The funeral is only four hours away. The crowds are unprecedented. Oh what that says of a remarkable man who left this world with absolutely no material possessions, but left a legacy that no billionaire could ever hope to attain.
I myself already have my alarm set so I can watch the entire service. I will record it just in case I fall asleep and so I can view it later.
I doubt there will ever be a Christian religious person to match the Pope in my lifetime. He deserves to be named John Paul the Great. I hope the process of becoming a saint goes on the fast track for him. He has earned the title of St. John Paul. I know that it takes a minimum number of years and for good reason.
Again, my prayers are with you personally. I highly respect you. I make so many typos now and my eyes are not that good some of the time. So I simply don't see the mistakes. Though on printed paper they are very apparent to me. But on this screen? No. But there was a time when I was considered one of the top English teachers in the school district. Of course it was sixth grade, not senior English.
In the darkness of night as you watch the Celebration of the LIfe of John Paul II and the Celebration of the Requim Mass, remember that I will be awake and worshiping with you.
Freddie
Not so. Pope Paul VI removed the excommunication of the Eastern Orthodox in Jerusalem in 1964. The Orthodox are allowed to receive communion in a Catholic Church today. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said of the Orthodox view of the situation. Except for those Greek Orthodox under the jurisdiction of his All Holiness Bartholomaios, Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople, the Eastern Orthodox congregations still view the Catholics as being heretics. Even in the dioceses under the Patriarch of Constantinople, a Catholic has to receive a special dispensation in order to share the Eucharist at an Orthodox liturgy.
Yes and no. Before the Great Schism, the Bishop of Rome held the place of honour as the primer inter pares ('the first among equals', even by the patriarchs of the East. Though the fact is largely ignored today, the Eastern Christians of the early Church deferred to the Pope. The bishops turned to the Pope to settle disputes rather than to their respective patriarchs. The Patriarch of Constantinople can trace his lineage back to Peter, as can the Patriarch of Antioch, but Rome was still the city of Peter and Paul, where they eventually met their martyrdoms. Today, the Eastern Orthodox Churches view Constantinople as the New Rome, and the Patriarch of Constantinople bears the title 'His All Holiness', unlike the other Easter Patriarchs who are called 'His Beatitude'. Though they don't all agree with his opinions or fall under his jurisdiction, Eastern Orthodox Christians consider His All Holiness as today's primer inter pares among their ranks, and the deference is apparent during Pan-Orthodox synods. The idea of a head honcho among the ecclesiastical hierarchy is in no way foreign to Eastern Orthodoxy; the only change is that the Bishop of Rome no longer holds that position.
My prayer is that under the new Pope, liturgical Protestants and Catholics can completely heal the schism that happend in the Protestant Reformation. I know that in the Methodist Church you can receive the Sacrament and I have Catholic relatives that have received Holy Communion in our Methodist Church. But my Catholic friends tell me that I can go to the front and receive a blessing from the priest, but I can't take Holy Communion unless I am Cathoic or Orthodox. But then I have another friend who is Catholic who says that yes Protestants can take Holy Communion. I know you can clarify this point for me.
Another point. It is my understanding from what I was taught that the position of Patriarch of Antioch is vacant as the city was never rebuilt. It is also my understanding that there are several patriarchs in Jerusalem all idenified with other churches. As in there is a Latin Patriarch which is Roman Cathoic, an Orthodox Patriarch, a Coptic Patriarch and I think some others. Whem tje Holy Land was taken over by the Muslims the Christian Church there suffered and Jerusalme lsot its itendity as a separate chruch with its own unique Patriarch.
In closing, Jacinto, my prayers are with you and all Christians, especially Cahtolic Christians. The funeral is only four hours away. The crowds are unprecedented. Oh what that says of a remarkable man who left this world with absolutely no material possessions, but left a legacy that no billionaire could ever hope to attain.
I myself already have my alarm set so I can watch the entire service. I will record it just in case I fall asleep and so I can view it later.
I doubt there will ever be a Christian religious person to match the Pope in my lifetime. He deserves to be named John Paul the Great. I hope the process of becoming a saint goes on the fast track for him. He has earned the title of St. John Paul. I know that it takes a minimum number of years and for good reason.
Again, my prayers are with you personally. I highly respect you. I make so many typos now and my eyes are not that good some of the time. So I simply don't see the mistakes. Though on printed paper they are very apparent to me. But on this screen? No. But there was a time when I was considered one of the top English teachers in the school district. Of course it was sixth grade, not senior English.
In the darkness of night as you watch the Celebration of the LIfe of John Paul II and the Celebration of the Requim Mass, remember that I will be awake and worshiping with you.
Freddie
Originally posted by DoubleMeatWhopper+Apr 7 2005, 09:10 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(DoubleMeatWhopper @ Apr 7 2005, 09:10 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-prepstudinsc@Apr 7 2005, 10:11 PM
The Roman church considers itself the one true church and thinks that the Orthodox churches are heretical
Not so. Pope Paul VI removed the excommunication of the Eastern Orthodox in Jerusalem in 1964. The Orthodox are allowed to receive communion in a Catholic Church today. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said of the Orthodox view of the situation. Except for those Greek Orthodox under the jurisdiction of his All Holiness Bartholomaios, Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople, the Eastern Orthodox congregations still view the Catholics as being heretics. Even in the dioceses under the Patriarch of Constantinople, a Catholic has to receive a special dispensation in order to share the Eucharist at an Orthodox liturgy.
The concept of one Patriarch being higher than another is foreign to all the Eastern Orthodox churches. All the Partiarchs are viewed as equal working in tandem over their respective jurisdiction. The Roman Patriarch taking charge and continuing to rule to this day was not the way that the position was set up to be.
Yes and no. Before the Great Schism, the Bishop of Rome held the place of honour as the primer inter pares ('the first among equals', even by the patriarchs of the East. Though the fact is largely ignored today, the Eastern Christians of the early Church deferred to the Pope. The bishops turned to the Pope to settle disputes rather than to their respective patriarchs. The Patriarch of Constantinople can trace his lineage back to Peter, as can the Patriarch of Antioch, but Rome was still the city of Peter and Paul, where they eventually met their martyrdoms. Today, the Eastern Orthodox Churches view Constantinople as the New Rome, and the Patriarch of Constantinople bears the title 'His All Holiness', unlike the other Easter Patriarchs who are called 'His Beatitude'. Though they don't all agree with his opinions or fall under his jurisdiction, Eastern Orthodox Christians consider His All Holiness as today's primer inter pares among their ranks, and the deference is apparent during Pan-Orthodox synods. The idea of a head honcho among the ecclesiastical hierarchy is in no way foreign to Eastern Orthodoxy; the only change is that the Bishop of Rome no longer holds that position.
[post=298256]Quoted post[/post]
[/b][/quote]