latest hate mail *sigh*

allan1015

Sexy Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Apr 14, 2007
Posts
136
Media
0
Likes
58
Points
498
Location
Orlando, FL
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
Don't fret Sassy. This guy has no concept of punctuation! His sense of sentence structure is so off based; it makes his hate speech almost unreadable, thus making his comments meaningless. Literally!
Be well and let your light not be diminished by such rants of an obvious lunatic.
 

No_Strings

Expert Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2007
Posts
3,967
Media
0
Likes
178
Points
283
Location
Dubai (United Arab Emirates)
The fucking freak is still at it, on a member who has been here for less than a week :rolleyes:

vichairyass
Gold Member

Registered: October 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 198 Fri June 8, 2007 7:34am Rating: 1.00
please remove your filth because this website was created for men to post their large born men penis for others to have as a support originally and many women who immorally appear here exposing actualy believe that this is what we men of big penis are needing to rive our erections news for you man it is not cause it is not why we are here but so many are so uneducated about this matter and so have many marital partner problems .thats why there here cant deal with an argument from there man , oh well i go on ,oh yes this website was for sale for 5000.00 at once if it goes up again i am buying and there will be major changes as i think are appropriate for this website for men of huge appndages. Boy am i glad i have one and proud of my manhood appendage . So men get in therr and vote and let your webmaster know we dont need this prostitute photos of filthy faceless women
 

Freddie53

Superior Member
Gold
Joined
Nov 19, 2004
Posts
5,842
Media
0
Likes
2,609
Points
333
Location
Memphis (Tennessee, United States)
Gender
Male
Much obliged, my good man. These fair maidens should not be subject to suffer fools.
Oh dear, Dokter_Rawk is back from the realm of the dead. Please sir, could you kindly give me a report of my dear son Freddie54 who was born in 2005 and died in 1791. Is he doing OK? Is Lucifer bothering him? I really would like a report my dear beloved son. Sorry you missed the big funeral at Radio Music City Hall with Prep on the Mighty Wurlitzer Theater Organ. Though I sitll am a bit miffed over him playing, "Happy Days are Here Again" in honor of my dear son Freddie54's passing. Though I really lost it when Prep played "What Took You So Long."
 

D_alex8

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2005
Posts
8,055
Media
0
Likes
1,297
Points
208
Location
Germany
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
vichairyass
Gold Member

(...)let your webmaster know we dont need this prostitute photos of filthy faceless women

That section alone should be grounds for an immediate irrevocable ban imho; it's a wholly unacceptable form of insult and harassment.

The sausagetard has had one temporary ban, now he should be made to fuck off forevermore.

I'll be counting the hours. :rolleyes:
 

snoozan

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2006
Posts
3,449
Media
0
Likes
22
Points
183
Sexuality
No Response
See below, second comment on same photo in my gallery. Porky thinks this guy is a useless fuck. Maybe I should change my username to Porky. It's kinda funny.


vichairyass

Gold Member

Registered: October 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 198 Fri June 8, 2007 2:43am

poor ,rated 0,can we have porky here eat more salads and fruits please no starch mam then i may reconsider the photo at www.LVSG.
 

D_N Flay Table

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2006
Posts
2,711
Media
0
Likes
16
Points
183
To be honest with you Snooze..
I read the 'hate mail' several times, but I still cant understand it.
Think of it like walking by the monkey cage at the zoo, they might screech at you, but you have no idea what they are saying. :)
 

Big Dreamer

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Posts
912
Media
0
Likes
9
Points
163
Sexuality
No Response
We should just fill the site with topics he'll find revolting until his head explodes. A few suggestions:

1) Ladies, please elaborate on mood swings during menstruation.

2) Girls, post your hottest internal vaginal photos here!

3) Pregnancy is sexy...... let's see those pics ladies.

4) Switching places.... this is where the ladies strap one on and gives it to their slutty man. Video entries also accepted.

Oddly, these all work as good and relevant topics.
 

B_big dirigible

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Posts
2,672
Media
0
Likes
12
Points
183
Sexuality
No Response
You're going to suggest this after all the bitching we had to endure over popularity contest threads? Really?

Seems like a bad idea to me, the potential for abuse would be pretty high.
I suspect that not having such a system results in more abuse. Right now members, usually new ones, are occasionally banned for - well, we don't generally know why. A major cause seems to be mulish persistence in single threads about basically trivial matters, which strikes me as a poor reason for a ban. As for regular posters, I can't think of one, current or already banned, whom I would have voted to ban ... not even DMW or Stronzo. But since most everyone seems to agree that vichairyass has no redeeming virtues, he might be the first. Or would be, if we had such a system. He's certainly not worth the bandwidth which has been expended talking about what to do about him and his depradations. We need some mechanism for this, and we've needed it for quite a while.
 

madame_zora

Sexy Member
Joined
May 5, 2004
Posts
9,608
Media
0
Likes
51
Points
258
Location
Ohio
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Big D, I'd agree with you, if we could stipulate two things:

1) That each section of the tos have a check box saying you've read it and agree to abide by it, as of NOW. Obviously, it can't be retroactive. That was my complaint with DMW- he violated nothing, since we had no tos.

2) That we add a section to the tos that says you have no "right to privacy" in pms here, and you understand that. Because individual members AND mods have varying opinions on this, the reasons for bans are often not told. MOST of them revolve around harrassment via private message. I say- fuckalotta that! If someone's big enough to harass ME in a PM, they have no need to believe I won't post it, but many people don't feel that way, and feel obliged to protect some schmuch even after they've done such a thing. Sadly, some of the mods concur. Bullshit. I say, tell all, show all. Don't do things in "private" that you'd be ashamed of in public, goddammit.
 

rob_just_rob

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2005
Posts
5,857
Media
0
Likes
43
Points
183
Location
Nowhere near you
I had always assumed that moderators could read private messages, and that they were therefore not private at all.

Beyond that, I can't believe that we're still discussing this. The member in question has been posting hate messages to people's galleries off-and-on for months. He or it hasn't added anything worthwhile (or even coherent) to the forums. He or it has been warned and temporarily banned before, to no effect. So, WHAT THE FUCK ARE THE MODERATORS WAITING FOR?
 

Big Dreamer

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Posts
912
Media
0
Likes
9
Points
163
Sexuality
No Response
Big D, I'd agree with you, if we could stipulate two things:

1) That each section of the tos have a check box saying you've read it and agree to abide by it, as of NOW. Obviously, it can't be retroactive. That was my complaint with DMW- he violated nothing, since we had no tos.

2) That we add a section to the tos that says you have no "right to privacy" in pms here, and you understand that. Because individual members AND mods have varying opinions on this, the reasons for bans are often not told. MOST of them revolve around harrassment via private message. I say- fuckalotta that! If someone's big enough to harass ME in a PM, they have no need to believe I won't post it, but many people don't feel that way, and feel obliged to protect some schmuch even after they've done such a thing. Sadly, some of the mods concur. Bullshit. I say, tell all, show all. Don't do things in "private" that you'd be ashamed of in public, goddammit.

I have no issue with posting a PM, although I would probably only post the relevant section that was mean spirited or bordering on violent.

This would also teach people to be cautious in terms of pouring their heart out to strangers, as you may find deeply personal issues up for public scrutiny if you're not selective. I've developed friendships in here strong enough that I don't mind divulging private information that isn't for the masses, but I also chose to align myself with level headed friends who wouldn't go apeshit and post everything over a mild disagreement.
 

madame_zora

Sexy Member
Joined
May 5, 2004
Posts
9,608
Media
0
Likes
51
Points
258
Location
Ohio
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
People who form deeper friendships are free to exchange real email addys and phone numbers- their correspondence need not be limited to here. I rarely send anything in a pm that would bother me if it were published, but if I was embarrassed, so the fuck what? Believe me, I apply the same rules to myself.

Shit, half of us have myspace pages or blogs. The core issue as always is ignorance. People don't understand that a letter- ANY letter is the property of the recipient, NOT the sender! Once you press send, or drop a letter in the mailbox, you no longer own the rights to your words, the person to whom you sent it does. Duh. If they choose to publish it around the world, they are well within their rights. People here expect special privacy rights that don't exist anywhere else, and I think it's retarded.
 

Yorkie

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Oct 5, 2006
Posts
5,412
Media
79
Likes
4,492
Points
358
Location
England (United Kingdom)
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
The member in question has been posting hate messages to people's galleries off-and-on for months. He or it hasn't added anything worthwhile (or even coherent) to the forums. He or it has been warned and temporarily banned before, to no effect. So, WHAT THE FUCK ARE THE MODERATORS WAITING FOR?
I've just had a quick look at the galleries and it appears all his comments have been removed - hopefully "hairyass" himself has also been removed. :cool:
 

B_NineInchCock_160IQ

Sexy Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2006
Posts
6,196
Media
0
Likes
40
Points
183
Location
where the sun never sets
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
I suspect that not having such a system results in more abuse. Right now members, usually new ones, are occasionally banned for - well, we don't generally know why. A major cause seems to be mulish persistence in single threads about basically trivial matters, which strikes me as a poor reason for a ban. As for regular posters, I can't think of one, current or already banned, whom I would have voted to ban ... not even DMW or Stronzo. But since most everyone seems to agree that vichairyass has no redeeming virtues, he might be the first. Or would be, if we had such a system. He's certainly not worth the bandwidth which has been expended talking about what to do about him and his depradations. We need some mechanism for this, and we've needed it for quite a while.

As obnoxious as you are sometimes, you haven't done anything that you should have been banned for. I have a feeling that if it were just up to popular vote who got to stick around and who did not, members such as yourself would soon find themselves voted off. I wouldn't support that. Not on principle because it would ethically be the cowardly thing to do and not for the sake of the site because in the long run it would probably hurt Rob financially. You accuse the moderators of playing favorites and banning people for arbitrary reasons... and your solution is to open up banning for popular vote? How does that make any sense at all? Your model was the show Survivor, which is NOTHING if not a popularity contest. (with a small twist of realpolitik, and a dash of Nickelodeon's DoubleDare)

If we made it so only a small number of votes were needed to vote someone off, then anybody who said anything even remotely controversial or unpopular would quickly get banned by people who didn't like them.
Or someone who illegally creates 10 accounts could accomplish the same thing by themselves.
If we needed a large number of votes this would probably be completely useless, as most of the posters here do not contribute or pay attention enough to make such a system work.
We could nominate a smaller number of individuals to keep the system in check that could veto unecessary bannings or ban flagrant violators of the TOS who were still popular, and they could also vote amongst themselves on appropriate courses of action to take. Other posters who wanted to vote someone off could in a sense make their own voices heard by alerting this smaller group of inviduals to the things these unpopular members were doing.... but... we already have that and they're called moderators.
 

Mr. Snakey

Expert Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2006
Posts
21,752
Media
0
Likes
123
Points
193
Sexuality
No Response
See below, second comment on same photo in my gallery. Porky thinks this guy is a useless fuck. Maybe I should change my username to Porky. It's kinda funny.


vichairyass
Gold Member

Registered: October 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 198 Fri June 8, 2007 2:43am

poor ,rated 0,can we have porky here eat more salads and fruits please no starch mam then i may reconsider the photo at www.LVSG.
My dear your new pic is amazing. You are a vision of beauty. I had to go back and look again. I saw this piece of shit left a nasty comment. I know you and i think(and hope] you wont let this bother you. He also left a nasty comment in a new female members gallery. I forget her name. The mods are great and everytime i bother them with my sometimes silly questions they allways get back and are very nice. Same with Rob E. Keep in mind they have lifes like you and i and dont get paid a plugged fuckin nickle for doing a job that isnt easy. So give them a chance. Anyway my love. My main point is you are simply beautifull. Why would you hide such an amazing body?:wink: :smile: :kiss:
 

Freddie53

Superior Member
Gold
Joined
Nov 19, 2004
Posts
5,842
Media
0
Likes
2,609
Points
333
Location
Memphis (Tennessee, United States)
Gender
Male
I suspect that not having such a system results in more abuse. Right now members, usually new ones, are occasionally banned for - well, we don't generally know why. A major cause seems to be mulish persistence in single threads about basically trivial matters, which strikes me as a poor reason for a ban. As for regular posters, I can't think of one, current or already banned, whom I would have voted to ban ... not even DMW or Stronzo. But since most everyone seems to agree that vichairyass has no redeeming virtues, he might be the first. Or would be, if we had such a system. He's certainly not worth the bandwidth which has been expended talking about what to do about him and his depradations. We need some mechanism for this, and we've needed it for quite a while.
A majority of bans are for underaged members which the evidence is not always in the public profile, but nevertheless confirmed in some way. A pm, a post etc.

Concerning the publishing of pm's. It is one thing for the recipient of a pm to publish it as Jana as pointed out. It is quite another for me a mod to take a pm without the permission of either the sender or recipient and presto publish it on the board. I don't think any member would want mods with the power to read through any pm they wish to read. That is a lot of power to just click each day on which member that pissed you off that day, and read all the pms and see if there is one that might be embarassing and publish it. I don't think Jana had this in mind at all.

Sometimes it is spam. Unless you happened to have read the offending post, you would never know that it was for spam. And how do we find the spammers? Our members do a fantastic job of reporting spammers, and underage members. And I would venture that these two categories cover well over half the bans that happen here.

I for one will not vote for a ban unless I really believe it is warrented. Temp bans for a day or a week to me are more effective in getting a member in line and hopefuly get them into the family instead of kicking them out.