D
deleted13797
Guest
what a complete douche bag. why the hell is he always talking about sausage?
Because people come here to see big man sausages.
what a complete douche bag. why the hell is he always talking about sausage?
Maybe he has a Jimmy Dean complex.:biggrin1:Because people come here to see big man sausages.
Oh dear, Dokter_Rawk is back from the realm of the dead. Please sir, could you kindly give me a report of my dear son Freddie54 who was born in 2005 and died in 1791. Is he doing OK? Is Lucifer bothering him? I really would like a report my dear beloved son. Sorry you missed the big funeral at Radio Music City Hall with Prep on the Mighty Wurlitzer Theater Organ. Though I sitll am a bit miffed over him playing, "Happy Days are Here Again" in honor of my dear son Freddie54's passing. Though I really lost it when Prep played "What Took You So Long."Much obliged, my good man. These fair maidens should not be subject to suffer fools.
vichairyass
Gold Member
(...)let your webmaster know we dont need this prostitute photos of filthy faceless women
I suspect that not having such a system results in more abuse. Right now members, usually new ones, are occasionally banned for - well, we don't generally know why. A major cause seems to be mulish persistence in single threads about basically trivial matters, which strikes me as a poor reason for a ban. As for regular posters, I can't think of one, current or already banned, whom I would have voted to ban ... not even DMW or Stronzo. But since most everyone seems to agree that vichairyass has no redeeming virtues, he might be the first. Or would be, if we had such a system. He's certainly not worth the bandwidth which has been expended talking about what to do about him and his depradations. We need some mechanism for this, and we've needed it for quite a while.You're going to suggest this after all the bitching we had to endure over popularity contest threads? Really?
Seems like a bad idea to me, the potential for abuse would be pretty high.
Big D, I'd agree with you, if we could stipulate two things:
1) That each section of the tos have a check box saying you've read it and agree to abide by it, as of NOW. Obviously, it can't be retroactive. That was my complaint with DMW- he violated nothing, since we had no tos.
2) That we add a section to the tos that says you have no "right to privacy" in pms here, and you understand that. Because individual members AND mods have varying opinions on this, the reasons for bans are often not told. MOST of them revolve around harrassment via private message. I say- fuckalotta that! If someone's big enough to harass ME in a PM, they have no need to believe I won't post it, but many people don't feel that way, and feel obliged to protect some schmuch even after they've done such a thing. Sadly, some of the mods concur. Bullshit. I say, tell all, show all. Don't do things in "private" that you'd be ashamed of in public, goddammit.
I've just had a quick look at the galleries and it appears all his comments have been removed - hopefully "hairyass" himself has also been removed.The member in question has been posting hate messages to people's galleries off-and-on for months. He or it hasn't added anything worthwhile (or even coherent) to the forums. He or it has been warned and temporarily banned before, to no effect. So, WHAT THE FUCK ARE THE MODERATORS WAITING FOR?
I've just had a quick look at the galleries and it appears all his comments have been removed - hopefully "hairyass" himself has also been removed.![]()
I suspect that not having such a system results in more abuse. Right now members, usually new ones, are occasionally banned for - well, we don't generally know why. A major cause seems to be mulish persistence in single threads about basically trivial matters, which strikes me as a poor reason for a ban. As for regular posters, I can't think of one, current or already banned, whom I would have voted to ban ... not even DMW or Stronzo. But since most everyone seems to agree that vichairyass has no redeeming virtues, he might be the first. Or would be, if we had such a system. He's certainly not worth the bandwidth which has been expended talking about what to do about him and his depradations. We need some mechanism for this, and we've needed it for quite a while.
My dear your new pic is amazing. You are a vision of beauty. I had to go back and look again. I saw this piece of shit left a nasty comment. I know you and i think(and hope] you wont let this bother you. He also left a nasty comment in a new female members gallery. I forget her name. The mods are great and everytime i bother them with my sometimes silly questions they allways get back and are very nice. Same with Rob E. Keep in mind they have lifes like you and i and dont get paid a plugged fuckin nickle for doing a job that isnt easy. So give them a chance. Anyway my love. My main point is you are simply beautifull. Why would you hide such an amazing body?:wink: :smile: :kiss:See below, second comment on same photo in my gallery. Porky thinks this guy is a useless fuck. Maybe I should change my username to Porky. It's kinda funny.
vichairyass
Gold Member
Registered: October 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 198 Fri June 8, 2007 2:43am
poor ,rated 0,can we have porky here eat more salads and fruits please no starch mam then i may reconsider the photo at www.LVSG.
A majority of bans are for underaged members which the evidence is not always in the public profile, but nevertheless confirmed in some way. A pm, a post etc.I suspect that not having such a system results in more abuse. Right now members, usually new ones, are occasionally banned for - well, we don't generally know why. A major cause seems to be mulish persistence in single threads about basically trivial matters, which strikes me as a poor reason for a ban. As for regular posters, I can't think of one, current or already banned, whom I would have voted to ban ... not even DMW or Stronzo. But since most everyone seems to agree that vichairyass has no redeeming virtues, he might be the first. Or would be, if we had such a system. He's certainly not worth the bandwidth which has been expended talking about what to do about him and his depradations. We need some mechanism for this, and we've needed it for quite a while.