Left-Wing Eco Terrorist Takes Hostages at Discovery Building

[B_VinylBoy]

Seriously, KTF40... take your pitiful, authoritarian argumentative stylings and kindly STFU. You (and the rest of your ilk) will learn that I am not the one you try to bulldoze around here. You made blind assumptions based on stereotypical political fodder, and you're mad that I don't completely agree with you. You'll just have to get over it because I'm not going to repeat myself or even bother pandering to you with that pathetically pigeon-holed question.

 

[unabear09]

Oh KTF40! You are such a brave courageous man! You wait until the thread is all but dead, and then you sweep in to rebuff (unsuccessfully btw...I have yet to read/see word one on this topic in relation to ANYTHING political outside of this useless ploy to bash liberals by not so subtly starting this 'thread'. You have failed!) when no one is looking.

I just don't know if I can let such heroics remain unseen by the masses!

Tool! (yeah I did resort to name calling. How totally repugnent of me *gasp*)

 

[unabear09]

Oh man, lot of posts since last time I visited. Aight, I'll try to get this done quick.

For some reason, I highly doubt that ^________ ^That's not the first time you've said that is it?

I am more inclined to believe that you waited until this thread was long dead to post more of your drivel (trying to be clever aren't we?) and not get a response back (giving you the final word, and in your mind making you the winner) from anyone. Well you picked one hell of a stupid time of day to do so didn't you? Ha HAA. You loose because you failed to realize that some of us have no lives on weeknights! Ha HAA I say Ha HAAA!

 

[KTF40]

Seriously, KTF40... take your pitiful, authoritarian argumentative stylings and kindly STFU. You (and the rest of your ilk) will learn that I am not the one you try to bulldoze around here. You made blind assumptions based on stereotypical political fodder, and you're mad that I don't completely agree with you. You'll just have to get over it because I'm not going to repeat myself or even bother pandering to you with that pathetically pigeon-holed question.

Can you name one Republican/conservative who is an environmentalist, peace activist, and secularist?

I'm just going to repeat that for kicks and giggles over how baffled you are by this question.

I have yet to read/see word one on this topic in relation to ANYTHING political outside of this useless ploy to bash liberals by not so subtly starting this 'thread'.

I hope you realize that even under that logic, this thread would belong here. There are multiple threads here that bash conservatives, makes sense for a liberal bashing thread to be here too. Even someone of your intelligence should understand that, right?

Oh man, lot of posts since last time I visited. Aight, I'll try to get this done quick.

For some reason, I highly doubt that ^________ ^That's not the first time you've said that is it?

I am more inclined to believe that you waited until this thread was long dead to post more of your drivel (trying to be clever aren't we?) and not get a response back (giving you the final word, and in your mind making you the winner) from anyone. Well you picked one hell of a stupid time of day to do so didn't you? Ha HAA. You loose because you failed to realize that some of us have no lives on weeknights! Ha HAA I say Ha HAAA!

Believe it or not, I don't spend my entire life on this forum. Unlike you who complains all day on the internet how you're broke, limp, live with your grandmother, and constantly bitches about how hard your life is (while doing nothing to fix the situation except post on a penis forum), I actually have things to do.

However, I did make a quick visit here Saturdayish but was a bit overwhelmed by all the responses to my posts (as well as the lack of quality in those responses, looking at you vinylboy) but chose not to respond because I wasn't in the mood and it would take too long. Now I have a little time and responded.

 

[B_VinylBoy]

Can you name one Republican/conservative who is an environmentalist, peace activist, and secularist?

I'm just going to repeat that for kicks and giggles over how baffled you are by this question.

Actually, that's just more evidence that you need to be spoken to like an infant on adult issues. It's not my fault that my response was too complex for you.

Thank you for proving that a person's age doesn't necessarily reflect their capacity to think. Now please, continue to be the butt end of the joke that is your own pathetic thread.

 

[unabear09]

Believe it or not, I don't spend my entire life on this forum. Unlike you who complains all day on the internet how you're broke, limp, live with your grandmother, and constantly bitches about how hard your life is (while doing nothing to fix the situation except post on a penis forum), I actually have things to do. lol you're so cute! And this post only shows your ingnorance of me, and how truly nasty and unsightly you are.
Here's the break down of some of the many, many, irroneous statements.
#1 Believe it or not, I don't spend my entire life on this forum.
Good for you! Neither do I! I also work a full time job (despite being told not to by my doctors because I have serious back problems brought on upon by a number of things including: 1. nearly being killed in a severe car wreck in '02 (two years of PT and 4 years of meds, and gosh it still hurts) #2 Years of being kicked in the back (and never being taken to the doctor) by a physically abusive mental nutjob known as Mom #3 A work related injury almost 2 years ago that involved me falling from a ladder (unemployment and workman's comp runs out you know...oh and do you know how hard it is to pay for a lawyer on unemployment & workman's comp?). I had to go back to work. Bills don't just disappear There are more things to list, but I digress.
#2 you're broke
Wow, you have a knack at not knowing dick! As I stated above, I have doctors bills, on top of credit card debt (that I had paid off before I was injured at work....not to mention several thousand dollars in savings), oh and I purchased a car on Friday...out of necessity (wow don't you have to have money to buy cars?)
#3 limp
Wow, you might want to get your eyes checked on that one. Have I been limp before? Sure, under heavy sedation/pain medicine, in a state of severe depression (caused from years of physical and sexual abuse and/or the years of chronic severe pain...hmmm, looks like you missed that little tid-bit0, or when very sick (its called the flu). I have taken some herbal supplements to see if they made any difference in anything (and they did, but I don't have the money for that junk any more since that pesky little fall at work....still not limp).
#4 live with your grandmother
you really didn't do your homework did you? Had you done your homework, you would have seen that I live with my grandmother out of necessity. She has alzheimers. She's 92. She doesn't have the money (nor do her children) or the resources to pay for assisted living/nursing home. None of my relatives are able to take her in (as they're all in their 60's and well....my family isn't known for living all that terribly long. 30 is considered middle age) or they live entirely too far away. Guess what? I need a place to live and she has to have someone to live with her. Home healthcare comes in a few times a week, as does my aunt that lives 45 minutes away She comes in for 2 hours 5 days a week as well. I work during the day (no later than 6pm now...just got a promotion and a $.50 raise go me!) and stay home at night. I get room and board in exchange for providing medical care for her, cleaning, cooking, washing clothes, etc.
constantly bitches about how hard your life is
live one day in my shoes...live one day in my shoes.
You would blow your brains out!
(while doing nothing to fix the situation except post on a penis forum)
Wow, reading everything I corrected you on above (all of which was conveniently located in one or more of the past 5000+ posts by me), it kinda sounds like you might be off a bit assumptions (I feel I'm being very generous with that word, as I have not been made an ass ). I'm doing quite a bit more than most would be if they were in my shoes. The one thing I've found to be accurate in your erroneous rant...that this is a penis forum.


However, I did make a quick visit here Saturdayish but was a bit overwhelmed by all the responses to my posts (as well as the lack of quality in those responses, looking at you vinylboy) but chose not to respond because I wasn't in the mood and it would take too long. Now I have a little time and responded.
Did you read any of the posts from anyone? I'm afraid most found you to be off base on your assertations of a hostage taking wack job being a Left-Wing Eco Terrorist (as you so eliquently posted). Oh and I think vinylboy (along with myself) did an outstanding job of rebuking your 'cold hard facts' *giggle*
Now, I think I am off to take a long bath. My whole body hurts and I have spent the better part my waking hours (up at 7am) at work. Its time I do something nice for myself.
Have a wonderful rest of the evening!

 

[maxcok]

I only quoted this section of your post because the first part is irrelevant as I've already addressed attempts to make me sound disingenuous in a previous post. Once again, another lpsg member who only bolds/quotes what fits his narrow minded view of what he thinks I'm saying.

LOL! It's not what I think you're saying, I bold/quote what in your "narrow minded view" YOU ACTUALLY ARE SAYING. THEY'RE YOUR OWN WORDS, BUDDY! I understand if reading your words again might be embarrassing, so you don't have to respond if you don't want to, but kindly show me where I altered your meaning by quoting you. Here.

And as for the racial stuff and my relationship with black people, not sure why you're so obsessed over that.

I'm not obsessed in the least. I think it's hilarious how you spout racist views and then try to cover your ass by saying how many black people you know, like those random black guys you allegedly played basketball with.
p.s. Still waiting for you to pick up your certificate.

To answer you questions though...

"Is secularism a trait you object to?"

Depends on what type of secularism you're referring too. If it's the kind James Lee supports, then yes.

There's only one kind of secularism that would be apropos to the line of questioning, but judging from your answer, I'm gonna guess this is a buzz word for you, and you're not even sure what it means. The concept is very simple. If you don't know, look it up - and stop your deflecting and bullshitting. Furthermore, the question, just like your generalized stereotypes of "Lefties", has nothing, NOTHING to do with James Lee. Just as your OP had NOTHING to do with politics, despite your failed pathetic attempt to spin a tragic event into a political issue and 'score points'. Ya know, it you were any more transparent you'd be invisible.

"Do you think our nation, as in our government and Constitution, are secular or religiously based?"

There is more to our nation than just the government and the constitution so this seems like an extremely poorly worded question.

What's poorly worded about it? It's a very simple, straightforward question and properly constructed to boot. I even defined for you exactly what I meant by "our nation". STOP DEFLECTING, STOP PLAYING DUMB, AND STOP BULLSHITTING! Here:

Do you think our nation, as in our government and Constitution, are secular or religiously based?

However, in a general sense, I would lean more towards secularly based assuming I understand you properly.

The correct answer does not allow for any waffling or "leaning". It's an either/or response. Tell ya what, after you look up "secularism", why don't you familiarize yourself with Amendment #1 in the Bill of Rights, the one that leads the list of important freedoms guaranteed Americans? Oh hell, here, I'll do it for you:

[FONT=trebuchet ms, arial, helvetica]"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."[/FONT]
​

We all know this is going to be a major political issues on tv, newspapers, and radio in the coming days so this is exactly where this thread belongs.

Really??? Why don't you get back to us when it becomes a "a major political issues" [sic] ?
(not counting the Faux Talk robot heads and Fatass Pillpopper Limbaugh, that is)

Anyway, in the spirit of moving the thread back on topic, it's now been four days since the hostage event, and I have a question for the OP. So has it developed into a major political issue yet, or have I missed something?

Update: It's now been a week.

To be honest, I'm stunned with the lack of coverage over this event. This seems like a perfect incident to point out liberal hypocrisy, but so far conservatives have been silent (except for talk radio of course). I thought for sure Fox would be all over this, but even they've ignored it except for a quick panel discussion on Hannity. I can only assume they are either taking the high ground (I know lol hahaha) or will bring it up if some right-wing loon does something as stupid as James Lee.

You're stunned. YOU'RE STUNNED!!! (lol hahaha) Maybe you should alert the major electronic and print media and explain to them how they're missing the obvious connection between liberal "Lefties" and mentally unhinged random nutcases. Write some editorials why don't you? Hell, call up the FBI and Homeland Security while you're at it. (lol hahaha)

Or maybe, just maybe you should consider the possibility that you are so blinded by your own ideology and so locked in your authoritarian mindset that you can't see how utterly ridiculous it is to try to turn this into a political issue. Just maybe you should consider that you're being manipulated by right-wing talk radio, that it's all in your mind and in the minds of all the other whackjobs who listen to that crap. Do yourself a favor. TURN OFF THE DAMN RADIO! TURN OFF THE FAUX NEWS SPIN! Find somewhere else to get some halfway balanced information.

You know what KTF? You're a complete joke. Let me repeat, you're a complete :joke:

This does have to do with politics.

:rolleyes2: I think it's time for virtual ignore, folks.

 

[B_TonyK8483]

Did this incident make any news stations?

 

[maxcok]

Did this incident make any news stations?

Well, I think it was covered pretty heavily the day it happened and maybe a little the next day or two. Of course, the bottom feeders will try to milk it for all it's worth. Oprah just announced she'll be featuring some of the hostages on her big 'O' show tomorrow. Of course, there's a tie-in for the big 'O'. She's launching her Oprah Winfrey network next year in a joint venture with . . . wait for it . . . . . . the Discovery Channel! TA-DA!!!

Anyway . . . we're still waiting for it to develop into "a major political issues" [sic] as KTF40 assured us it would, but so far, not so much. But heck, it's only been a little over two weeks, so who knows?

We all know this is going to be a major political issues on tv, newspapers, and radio in the coming days so this is exactly where this thread belongs.

 

[helgaleena]

I support the wack job's POV about human overpopulation, but not his methods. And his POV is not 'left-wing' or 'right-wing' as far as I can tell. I though the quote from Maggie Thatcher earlier on would have demonstrated that. Just because Gore made a documentary does not mean the environment is 'liberal'. All politicos are shitting on Mother Nature at the same rates because they want there to be more voters and cannon fodder and 'consumers' to sell to and make things. That is why suicide is illegal in most countries.

 

[maxcok]

^ I agree with all that, except for one major distinction. In the US at least, there has been a concentrated and deliberate effort among so-called "conservatives" on the right to ridicule and debunk anything that smacks of environmental concern as a wacky liberal indulgence (note the OP), including human overpopulation concerns. No surprise, as they are the tools of big business concerns who are intent on raping the planet for natural resources and short term profit and using it as a dumping ground for industrial waste. The climate change deniers and promoters of pseudo science (and incidentally folks like the teapartiers) are funded by those same corporate interests, as JustAsking showed in this excellent link, which I've imported from another thread:

Follow the Koch money.

"Koch Industries, an oil supply and refining company, is one of the largest private corporations in the country. Despite being virtually invisible to the public, Koch Industries is a top lobbying spender, a massive funding source to climate-denial front-groups, and major force fighting against clean energy policies. Charles and David Koch, who own and control the corporation, drive the anti-environmental political spending."
​

It's ironic to me that so-called "conservatives" are the least concerned about "conservation" of the natural environment that we all depend on for our very survival as a species.