Length/Girth proportion?

Discussion in 'Underwear, Clothing, and Appearance Issues' started by LemacST, May 12, 2007.

  1. LemacST

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    1,096
    Likes Received:
    3
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Ca
    We all know penises come in different shapes and sizes, short and fat, long and skinny, etc. but when you think of a "standard" penis, as in not fatter or skinnier than average for it's length, there's a certain balance with the girth I think. I feel a lot of it goes by inch and half inch incriments, length and girth respectively...maybe something like this.

    5x4.5
    6x5
    7x5.5
    8x6
    9.6.5

    and so on.
    this was just an observation I made. feel free to post your thoughts
     
  2. Lordpendragon

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2004
    Messages:
    3,880
    Likes Received:
    1
    I think you should accept the world the way it is, and balance your desire for order with chaos theory.
     
  3. Scott8361

    Scott8361 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2004
    Messages:
    559
    Albums:
    2
    Likes Received:
    281
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Milwaukee (WI, US)

    Yeah, I think that kind of rings true. That' why mine bothers me being 6x4.5... it just need more meat on its bone!!!

    I find i really like the look of those that have a higher proportion of girth to length... like 6x6, 7x7, 8x7
     
  4. benderten2001

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2002
    Messages:
    1,029
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think the "girth factor" gets commonly ignored.

    Having looked at thousands of depictions (now) on the net (a fact I'm not overly proud of, btw! :rolleyes: ), I tend to realize that it's GIRTH that seems to typify a truly humongous one, and not necessarily length.

    From the ladies' standpoint as well, we're hearing that it's girth that makes all the (considerable) difference.

    I've taken notice in the visual discrepanceis too...

    An 8" erect x 5" girth looks longer while an 8" erect by 6.5" girth? -- looks shorter.

    Judging true sizes by photos is (perhaps always will be?) VERY difficult.
     
  5. darkone

    darkone New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Messages:
    721
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    I would say avg person would have a 6x5
     
  6. buffbaldy

    buffbaldy New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2006
    Messages:
    898
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    17
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    upstate NY
    8 x 7 here always told I was thick but I think it makes it look shorter
     
  7. cgttown

    cgttown Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Messages:
    462
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    10
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Tulsa, Oklahoma
    I'm just over 7" x 5.5. So, when I'm hard, it's a nice lookin cock that gets the job done quite well. Aesthetically pleasing and very utilitarian. However, soft, I look smaller since I'm a major grower. Guess that's why I always want to get a semi before I head to the shower in the locker room. I'm not vain, but I like gettin the second glance myself, too. LOL
     
  8. D_BobN_Weave

    D_BobN_Weave New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2005
    Messages:
    224
    Likes Received:
    1
    im actually thicker than i am longer......im 5.25x5.5.....so im small either way compared to anyone
     
  9. ostrich egg

    ostrich egg Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2007
    Messages:
    256
    Likes Received:
    0
    w00!! now i dont feel so bad for being disproporionate! 7x7 (7.5 base)
     
Draft saved Draft deleted