Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Et Cetera, Et Cetera' started by B_Stronzo, Aug 12, 2006.
Jesus needs new clothes.
Here's the latest in Christian chic:
Jesus never looks as they describe him in the Bible. Funny how that works.
Bronze skin. Hair like lamb's wool.
Have you noticed the resemblance to Andresito ?
You can still put Him in a dress or a tutu! Doesn't it make it a bit of fun though? I think the only thing missing is his "Mary Madgalene" bride co-hort.
Stronzo, you are just so wrong. I love it!
Lex, whatever would make you think that the black-velvet-jesus-pictures don't accurately depict a man born 2000-odd years ago in the middle-east?
Sorry, Stronzo. I lost interest when I did not see a harness or a jock.
You know how I am. :wink:
There seems to be a flaw in the programming of that site, though.
Because no matter how hard I try, I can't seem to get 'His' underwear off at all.
alex... God will get you with one wave of Her mighty hand for thinking that.
Yes and I think a letter to the site designer is due. There's oh-so-much more one could do to Jesus to make her more appealing to all our fantasies.
Nay I say to those who'd homogenize Her. Let's make a Jesus to whom we all can relate!
**interesting aside. A woodcarver I know here on the Cape is a total nutball in a lovable way. He recently put a banner (monstrous) on the side of his studio in near Hyannis that read "JESUS WAS GAY!!".
The hew and cry is deafening to this day.
??? Since jesus was "a good god-fearin christian" and was not married, he had neither genitals nor a naked body. He was born wearing the undies, and they were not removeable.
Well that is one nude photo you did not get. You really are slipping :biggrin1:
The whole fair-skinned people living in desert conditions and surviving pre-sunblock kinda gives it all away.
We know that Jesus was not the white man portrayed in all the artwork from the last century or so. The Bible clearly states that he was not handsome and that he had dark wooly hair. It was the Euro-centric artists that started portraying him with blond hair and blue eyes and making him look strikingly handsome in a Nordic or Saxon way that got him away from looking like a person would if they came from the Middle East or North Africa. Dark hair, darker complexions and curly hair tend to be the norms in the southern Mediterranean regions. I'm only guessing, but I think that you'd be hard pressed to find a light skinned, blond haired, blue eyed Judean back in Jesus' time.
As to the Jesus' dress up, it's just plain stupid.
It is silly isn't it Monty? But I thought the board needed a bit of levity.
And I enjoyed your history lesson but I think a more seriously religious thread would have been the ticket. This one's meant in good clean fudge.:tongue:
I tried to pull them off, too. :biggrin1:
The designer should have created him like a Ken doll with the "flesh" colored bump.
What a funny link
Clever.. but if it was Mohammed... me thinks you funny yet hypocritical folk wouldn' touch it with a 10ft pole.
what the fuck is that supposed to mean?
It's one of several farewell 'drive-by shittings' left by faceking it seems, bless him.
Let's see if his temper tantrum, gallery-clearing exodus has half the glamour of yours, Alex8. You set a pretty high bar recently. :tongue: