I reject both of these labels and reject labels in general, especially when people try to apply them to me. My personal political beliefs are all over the political spectrum, with views that include very "liberal" positions, very "conservative" positions, some very "libertarian" positions, and some that are just plain off the political map. I sometimes describe myself as a moderate or centrist, but again, that's another inadequate label when it comes to accurately describing me complete with its own baggage. I don't mind the label of moderate as much as these other labels though because to me personally it connotes someone who is able to be realistic, not beholden to idiotic and infantile partisanship, able to compromise, admit mistakes, revise opinions, etc. Someone not completely biased that sees everything in black and white.
The negative connotations that go with the label of "moderate" I could do without, though. I'm not someone who can't make up their mind, I'm not someone with no opinions on anything, I'm not a habitual fence-sitter, I'm not under-informed, I'm not politically unaffiliated due to apathy or ignorance, and it's not that I'm afraid to take a stand on anything or say what I believe in.
I think both major political parties in the United States are corrupt, backward, inefficient and ineffectual. I also think they are far more similar then either will admit. I would be loathe to ever cast a vote for either a registered Republican or a registered Democrat. I also don't see how the list of things that either party is supposed to stand for is necessarily wholly congruous. There are many issues out there that don't seem to me like they are liberal or conservative issues, yet in Washington EVERY stupid thing gets placed in one of two camps. It's absurd.
I have more views today that would be described as "liberal" than I used to. I was raised by my father who is a stalwart Republican (even though he used to be a hippy, but I think just because it was trendy. Now instead of getting his ideas from John Lennon he gets them from Fox News). When I was a child and still thought like a child (and therefore thought like most political pundits) I considered myself a Republican as well. I was also raised as a Christian, and when I was a child I thought of myself as a Christian. As I got older, I started thinking for myself and forming my own political and spiritual ideology and forming my own sense of identity. I stopped listening to Rush Limbaugh around 1999, stopped liking Bill O'Reilly around 2002, and accepted that Bill Clinton really wasn't that bad of a president around 2003 or so. To my credit I never cared for Hannity.
Anyway, long story short and to answer the OP: I'm none of the above. Why? I think for myself. If you attempt to categorize or label me, you will inevitably be WRONG. If you want to know where I stand on an issue, you're going to have to ask me and wade through a nuanced and detailed answer. Reality is not binary.