Liberals = Cowardly Hypocrites

maxcok

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,153
Media
0
Likes
125
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
Is that a problem?
It's more than a little unusual, and presumptuous in my opinion. I think many would agree with me.

Can you find some different words? I think you just like to hear yourself say the words "inflammatory yet vacuous", lol.
Just calling it what it is, bro.

Trying your hardest to find one typo makes your argument much stronger.
Wasn't trying to find a typo. I assumed it was a cliche pun.


Yes, that is true. Is there a problem with not being into black guys?
It depends in what sense you're not "into" black guys and why, so I can't answer that for you.

 

NightOwlGate

Experimental Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2010
Posts
163
Media
2
Likes
8
Points
53
Sexuality
69% Gay, 31% Straight
Gender
Male
Good grief.:eek:
Well, honesty is the best policy. Just because I'm not attracted to black
men does not mean that I hate black people or that I'm racist.

Wasn't trying to find a typo. I assumed it was a cliche pun.
Another mistake on YOUR part, not mine. It was a typo. I think your
assumption says a lot about you, however.

It depends in what sense you're not "into" black guys and why, so I can't answer that for you.
You didn't seem to have a problem making assumptions earlier,
did you just suddenly lose that ability?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

maxcok

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,153
Media
0
Likes
125
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
You seem ironically unable to tell me why not being into black men is
a bad thing.
Why does it not surprise me that you would deflect by misattributing a quote of mine? When I said you were ironically narrow minded it was not in reference to what you said about black guys. It was in reference to your sweeping and false generalizations, and specifically your presumption that I'm a Democrat simply because I disagree with you, which ironically undermines your entire thesis. The full quote in context:
If you're so "open-minded" and determined to disprove stereotypes, why do you presume I'm a Democrat? Doesn't that contradict the thesis of your simultaneous thread - "I am living proof that everything you know is wrong" ? LOLOL

You seem ironically very narrow minded after all.
It may also surprise you to learn that I am not here at your service to respond immediately. As it turns out though, I was in the process of posting a response to your question when you thought it necessary to ask again. The response is above. Note: I never said it was "a bad thing" btw, I simply quoted what you said. You can continue to speak for yourself in that regard.
 

B_talltpaguy

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Posts
2,331
Media
0
Likes
17
Points
123
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Your polarized generalizations are absurd. And again, I ask you:

Why have you started two simultaneous threads on the same inflammatory yet vacuous topic?


Isn't that blatant trolling?
Yes, by any reasonable definition, this guy is a pure troll.
 

JTalbain

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2005
Posts
1,786
Media
0
Likes
14
Points
258
Age
34
Ah, I see. You've lost the ability to Google

Since you've lost that skill, perhaps you have retained the ability
to left click on a link?

Here you go: http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2009/10/80000-is-the
high-number-of-troops-recommended-in-mcchrystals-request.html
No, I actually was able to find that article, I was just wondering why you interpreted it this way. What they are saying is that McChrystal gave three different plans. One plan required 80,000 additional troops, one required 40,000, and the last required only 10,000 but was deemed "high risk". They were all plans, however, which were deemed appropriate by General McChrystal. Obama, did not choose the high risk plan, and did not choose the plan which placed the most US investment into Afghanistan. He made the, and you'll just love the word being used in this fashion, conservative choice.

Trying to say that Obama ignored the General and put the country at risk, when he in fact chose a plan provided to him by the general and avoided the high risk option, is blatantly lying. My Google skills are fine, I was merely giving your ability to read the benefit of the doubt.

No, actually it's not. It was photoshopped to make them seem like they
were kissing on the lips. He was kissed on the cheek, not the lips.

:lmao:Wow, you fell for that one! So now you are admitting the authenticity of the fact that he kissed a foreign head of state and walked while holding his hand? We were discussing foreign policy, not whether Dubya was gay. What made you think where he kissed the man was relevant?
 

NightOwlGate

Experimental Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2010
Posts
163
Media
2
Likes
8
Points
53
Sexuality
69% Gay, 31% Straight
Gender
Male
Why does it not surprise me that you would deflect by misattributing a quote of mine? When I said you were ironically narrow minded it was not in reference to what you said about black guys. It was in reference to your sweeping and false generalizations, and specifically your presumption that I'm a Democrat simply because I disagree with you, which ironically undermines your entire thesis. The full quote in context:
It may also surprise you to learn that I am not here at your service to respond immediately. As it turns out though, I was in the process of posting a response to your question when you thought it necessary to ask again. The response is above. Note: I never said it was "a bad thing" btw, I simply quoted what you said. You can continue to speak for yourself in that regard.
Once you start rambling about things with no substance, it basically means
I won the debate and you can't stand it. Sorry bro, maybe next time lol.

Yes, by any reasonable definition, this guy is a pure troll.
Says an obviously trashy welfare dad who can't even be bothered to have
as much substance as Maxcok.

:lmao:Wow, you fell for that one!
Fell for what? I never denied Bush kissed him on the cheek.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

B_talltpaguy

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Posts
2,331
Media
0
Likes
17
Points
123
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
^If you want to get personal with me, let me know when you've panhandled for bus money to Tampa, FL, and I'll be happy to meet you in person to discuss this like men... Otherwise, I don't really give a shit what you have to say, since you're obviously too much of a pussy to actually put your money where your mouth is.

Ah, I see. So by adding less than what was asked for (which you conveniently forget to add a link for) he decreased our military power there, even though he has added soldiers, bringing our count up to about 60,000? I don't suppose you are counting the additional forces being added to our supply by the training of Afghan security forces either? Kinda important numbers there, especially since we have plans to withdraw in a couple of years.
He is using old 1990's style rightwing hack politics...

Anything that isn't 100% according to their worldview is in fact a negative. So for example, if they are presently paying a 25% tax, and wanted a 0% income tax rate, but the rate was instead reduced to 15%, that's considered a 15% 'tax increase' by them, not a 10% decrease, and they market it as such... It doesn't matter if their request was fiscally impossible, the simple fact that they asked for something and didn't get ALL of it sends them on a rampage to destroy whoever it was that told them no.
 
Last edited:

maxcok

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,153
Media
0
Likes
125
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
Another mistake on YOUR part, not mine. It was a typo. I think your
assumption says a lot about you, however.


You didn't seem to have a problem making assumptions earlier,
did you just suddenly lose that ability?
Other than assuming "I wanna 'meat' straight bros" was an intentional if cliche pun, a quite reasonable assumption, what other assumptions have I made that you can cite?

I think you're being disingenuous, btw. I think you intended it that way exactly. Not that anyone cares. It's interesting that you're the one making an issue of it; all I did was quote you with no comment. Methinks the gentleman doth protest too much.
 
Last edited:

maxcok

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,153
Media
0
Likes
125
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
Once you start rambling about things with no substance, it basically means
I won the debate and you can't stand it. Sorry bro, maybe next time lol.
What debate? There's no debate here. I'm just holding up a mirror to your hypocrisy and absurdity. Sorry you don't like the view, but you haven't "won" anything, chump.

Why don't you do us all a favor and get out before you make a bigger ass of yourself:
That said, I will most likely spend little time in the politics section here, as having a penis (no matter the size) doesn't mean you know what you're talking about when you discuss/debate politics.
As for the rest of your quote, so true. And you have proved it resoundingly.

 

JTalbain

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2005
Posts
1,786
Media
0
Likes
14
Points
258
Age
34
Fell for what? I never denied Bush kissed him on the cheek.
:lmao: You're missing the point. If Obama acted inappropriately by bowing, then Bush certainly did by kissing. I intentionally was specific about the location of the kiss, and you added a correction about the location, admitting Bush was at fault by your standards as well.

Here's an illustration...

District Attorney: You shot that man in the heart didn't you?
Accused: No, it was in the head.
DA: Aha! You did shoot him!!
Accused: Dammit...

So, I reiterate. You were of course upset when Bush kissed the Saudi King, correct?
 

B_talltpaguy

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Posts
2,331
Media
0
Likes
17
Points
123
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
He's trying to instigate people, but he's too much of a pussy to actually do it in person, so he's getting online in the middle of the night to do it. My guess is he hit on a straight guy tonight, got smacked in the mouth, and now he's looking to take it out on someone.

The problem for our new troll is that he's a gay, white trash Republican living in flyover country. He's already at the bottom of the social hierarchy. There's literally no one to take out his frustrations on in real life who won't beat his ass, so here he is cowering behind the anonymity of the internet.
 

JTalbain

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2005
Posts
1,786
Media
0
Likes
14
Points
258
Age
34
He's trying to instigate people, but he's too much of a pussy to actually do it in person, so he's getting online in the middle of the night to do it. My guess is he hit on a straight guy tonight, got smacked in the mouth, and now he's looking to take it out on someone.

The problem for our new troll is that he's a gay, white trash Republican living in flyover country. He's already at the bottom of the social hierarchy. There's literally no one to take out his frustrations on in real life who won't beat his ass, so here he is cowering behind the anonymity of the internet.
Oh, I know. Occassionally, it's fun kicking around such fragile logic, though. I should tell him all about my beliefs. He'd probably need a sturdy helmet to keep me from literally blowing his mind.
 

invisibleman

Cherished Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2005
Posts
9,816
Media
0
Likes
495
Points
303
Location
North Carolina
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
On the contrary, I've been PMed by straight guys interested in me on this website.

Oh, please...
Looks like someone is jealous.

Jealous? Envious? I doubt that.

But no, you're right, I don't expect black men to be
attracted to me. I find that to be a good thing, however.


That is nice to know. :smile:
 

invisibleman

Cherished Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2005
Posts
9,816
Media
0
Likes
495
Points
303
Location
North Carolina
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
Says an obviously trashy welfare dad who can't even be bothered to have
as much substance as Maxcok.
^If you want to get personal with me, let me know when you've panhandled for bus money to Tampa, FL, and I'll be happy to meet you in person to discuss this like men... Otherwise, I don't really give a shit what you have to say, since you're obviously too much of a pussy to actually put your money where your mouth is.

Remember...

"What happens in FIGHT CLUB, stays in FIGHT CLUB."--Tyler Durden.
 

conntom

Cherished Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2008
Posts
2,170
Media
1
Likes
253
Points
208
Location
Boston (Massachusetts, United States)
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
I love how the Liberals said for 8 years that "dissent is the highest form of patriotism", but now that
they have a black Democrat in office, if you don't like a certain tax, aren't below the poverty level, and
don't take a H1N1 shot, you're a "racist, teabagging redneck". How open-minded.

I love this man.

I also love it when someone who is gay or black or hispanic stands with those of use who identify with the Tea Party. We are not racist homophobes. We don;t like the direction gov;t is heading in and want to stop it. Things of sexual orientation or race do not matter to us as it is portrayed.

I think it takes a particularly strong soul to be gay or be a minority and stand up to this administration and I applaud you who do such as Axmann.
 

B_VinylBoy

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2007
Posts
10,363
Media
0
Likes
68
Points
123
Location
Boston, MA / New York, NY
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
I love how the Liberals said for 8 years that "dissent is the highest form of patriotism", but now that
they have a black Democrat in office, if you don't like a certain tax, aren't below the poverty level, and
don't take a H1N1 shot, you're a "racist, teabagging redneck". How open-minded.

Dissent is the highest form of patriotism.
However, forming militias and threatening violence is taking it overboard.
Only a coward reaches for their gun just because government did something they didn't like.