D_Elijah_MorganWood
Expert Member
(suddenly craves Tapioca)Latinoboy9 said:Thick & White like tapioca Yummy too! Jose'Latinoboy9
(suddenly craves Tapioca)Latinoboy9 said:Thick & White like tapioca Yummy too! Jose'Latinoboy9
tygrrr said:yummy and delicious indeed! :tongue: Just discovered my absolute favorite pudding! :biggrin1:
hypolimnas said:Oh you whore. Anyway, I realise I need check some pms so I'll be over later.
I don't mind leftovers. :wink:
bigbens said:What percentage of LPSG is fact... and how much is fiction?
DeeBlackthorne said:Sadly enough, a few members have commented on the competitive nature of size and I think that's something almost inescapable. Seriously, I think short-sticked guys invented the method of measuring from the bottom and those who aren't crazy about curves went for the side. Despite the exact stoichiometry involved, whatever my exact number is, it's two hands and then some and no one has told me I'm small to date, so...
Sorcerer said:(suddenly craves Tapioca)
bastige said:because it would be revealed that all republicans are 6" and smaller.
davidjh7 said:You know, something just occured to me about the Kinsey study....as I recall, to try and lessen the chances of measurement error, he gave the men cards, had them mark the end of their dick. Now assuming that the majority didn't mismark the card to make themselves appear bigger, maybe they actually placed the card on the bottom side of their dicks, rather than the top, as is now more generaly accepted as "correct". It would be easier to mark the card if your dick was on top of the card. If so, then this could account for the nearly 1" discrepency between Kinsey's studies and later studies....Hmmm...interesting conjecture .
DeeBlackthorne I think the liars need to cultivate some different hobbies. And take some new photos. Is it me or do y'all feel like you've seen it all by now? Of course said:Problem is that lying is a hobby to some and we're the unfortunate recipients of the fruits of their free time.
Honestly, I think the question posted by the OP leaves plenty of room for discussion about reinventing oneself on the internet. After all, if someone is lying about the size of his cock, chances are that person has no qualms lying about anything else.
Hung Muscle said:Agree completely.
What also intrigues me is the fact that some members here call out the liars and are immediately jumped on by a posse of defenders. I mean, how many DD-cup "women" can fit in the chatroom at one time?
Yes You cant lie too much with picsthk8plus4u said:I take issue with those who have not presented PICS of themselves. If LPSG is indeed about our bigger than average dicks, why in the world woudn't you present your PRIZE?
These people without pics almost always boast of cocks that are anywhere from eleven to fourteen inches. How easy is it to make such claims WITHOUT pics to prove it?
I read messages from these NON-PIC members with much disbelief and doubt.
Well said Nice pics Tripodtripod said:Yes, breast implants are flippin' ridiculous. Why any woman wouldn't love their small breasts is beyond me. Breast implants pose major health concerns and are dangerous. Besides Mister Mark, I believe that there are no silicone injectors on this site. That is serious body modification! I am just sensitive to the "size that you were born with" thing. I pump, and the women I have been with absolutely drool with zeal at the size of my cock, I don't lie, I tell them. None of them were ever turned off. I think that the type of people that pump are the shy reclusive types. They are not usually running around having heterosexual sex with women. A lot of them are gay. Most women have absolutely no experience with men who vacuum pump, it is just not that common. Does everyone feel that health clubs or gyms are centers of "body modification"? Most people go to the gym for reasons of vanity, to make their arms bigger or thighs smaller. It takes a lot of dedication in the gym for someone to produce a beautiful physique. Stand a person that created his body through natural methods and hard work next to someone that was born with a beautiful body. Is there any difference, if anything society values the hard work and effort of the "self made man" in higher value then the "man of creation" who was just BORN THE WAY THEY WERE. So, shouldn't that translate to the concept of natural penile enlargement? Pumping for permanent gains requires years of hard work and dedication, something most men can't or aren't willing to do. Most pumpers aren't very serious and don't get serious results. Breasts are for milk production and play a very minor role in sexual relations between a man and a woman. They are not necessary for the "deed"! If anything, penile enlargement can have a biological use. It makes the penis larger, allowing for deeper penetration and more sexual stimulation for the female. This can have an effect on the sperms chances of reaching the egg. Increased girth allows for stimulation of the clitoris by pulling on the hood, increasing the chances for a female orgasm. A woman having an orgasm is more likely to get pregnant than one who doesn't. I know that's a stretch to corrolate PE with fertility, but I just wanted to say, not to hate on the pumpers. Pumping is not expensive, and is available to EVERY MAN if they so choose. It also is very safe. Surgical augmentation is very expensive and NOT SAFE! Huge difference, I hope I didn't irritate anyone with this post, just trying to shed some light on the "natural" vs. the "unnatural"