rob_just_rob said:So how was the movie?
alex8 said:I think the review should also carry a warning about Eartha Kitt's "voice-only rôle" in the movie, though, which consists of about 30 seconds of vocal growls and somebody playing her 50s hit "Uska Dara" in the background of one scene.
I love bad movies... but this one was worse than that.
Getting ready to direct three shows and a long year of teaching. That, or getting laid! I think the latter rather than the former.dongalong said:What should you be doing instead of spending time at LPSG?
Hatched69 said:MST3K material..??
SERIOUSLY!!! You're posts should come with a warning! I just spit coffee all over my laptop when I read that. :biggrin1:Pecker said:I should be surfing the net for porn but I'm afraid something salicious might happen at LPSG while I'm gone.
chicagosam said:Getting ready to direct three shows and a long year of teaching. That, or getting laid! I think the latter rather than the former.
alex8 said:Insomniacs Anonymous material.
MST3K usually picks on movies that already have an entertainment value, and as such, shouldn't be considered "bad" at all... and generally their lack of artistic and aesthetic finesse is already quite endearing.
Then there are the movies in this world that are just dull. And they're beyond MST3Kability, beyond salvation.
WAIT!!!alex8 said:I think the review should also carry a warning about Eartha Kitt's "voice-only rôle" in the movie, though, which consists of about 30 seconds of vocal growls and somebody playing her 50s hit "Uska Dara" in the background of one scene.
I love bad movies... but this one was worse than that.
novice_btm said:WAIT!!!
Did YOU just type a word without using the proper diacritics??? :tongue:
alex8 said:Yes, I did. I have a lawyer in Santa Monica in case you feel the need to sue. :tongue:
A bit bushy in the beard department, and a little hyperactive in a "the call is coming from inside the house" kinda way.novice_btm said:Really? In Sa Mo? Is he cute? :tongue:
Hatched69 said:***Shudders in fear of the world coming to an end***
I thought it was Dec. 21, 2012 (according to the Mayans' fastidious time-keeping, anyway, and also 2012, but date not given, according to the "Bible code" thingy)?alex8 said:December 23rd 2028. You've plenty of time yet. :saevil:
novice_btm said:I thought it was Dec. 21, 2012 (according to the Mayans' fastidious time-keeping, anyway, and also 2012, but date not given, according to the "Bible code" thingy)?
Hmm, perhaps, but don't even get me started on the Prophesy of Malachai chiming in on the action!alex8 said:A woman on a cross-country coach once assured me it was 23rd December 2028, and frankly, I believed her, if only due to her slightly disarming hairstyle and leer.