LPSG women R very beautiful...

[thirdlegmeat]

I recently read a study that said women who highly prize large penis size also rate themselves as "very attractive." On the other hand, women who rate themselves as "average," "less attractive," etc., correspondingly negate the importance of penis size in a partner.

I find this terribly interesting. Obviously I have some motivation to want this to be true But beyond that, I beleive this observation gives us profound insight into the legitmate importance of size. Essentially what this tells us is that women who are beautiful enough to "catch" a well-endowed man indeed search for large appendages--almost as if they deserve a "hung" man. But women who perhaps can't "catch" the big fish, settle for a small fry. This is a generality, of course.

Opinions?

 

[SurferGirlCA]

Good lover with average/small endowment > Bad lover with large endowment

Battery-operated device > bad lover with average/small endowment

Well-endowed good lover = jackpot!

 

[thirdlegmeat]

Originally posted by SurferGirlCA@Aug 13 2005, 04:16 AM
Good lover with average/small endowment > Bad lover with large endowment

Battery-operated device > bad lover with average/small endowment

Well-endowed good lover = jackpot!

[post=335060]Quoted post[/post]​

Well then, I hope you find your pot-of-gold at the end of the rainbow. There's no rule that says you can't have it all.

 

[mordecai17]

Nobody "deserves" any kind of treatment or perks because of how they look based on factors out of their control(genetics). Wow. I really hope not too many people think like that.

 

[nark29]

Originally posted by mordecai17@Aug 13 2005, 08:51 PM
Nobody "deserves" any kind of treatment or perks because of how they look based on factors out of their control(genetics). Wow. I really hope not too many people think like that.

[post=335213]Quoted post[/post]​

Something tells me Mordecai17 is hung like a grasshopper. :nopity:

 

[KinkGuy]

Originally posted by ChimeraTX@Aug 13 2005, 04:04 PM
“There is nothing so unequal as the equal treatment of unequal people.” - Thomas Jefferson

Food for thought.

[post=335229]Quoted post[/post]​

Is there no discussion that Chimera CAN'T turn into a race, supremacy issue?

 

[absinthium]

I don't see the relevance in quoting Thomas keeping-my-own-children-as-slaves-after-I-raped-their-mother Jefferson on equal treatment, but I'm sure that's just because I'm one of those silly, overly-sensitive quadroons.

Ahem...

I would count myself as above-average in attractiveness, and I'd much rather be with a caring, skilled partner than one who just had a huge dick. Gigantic dicks are adorable and everything, but I honestly don't see what all the fuss is about.

Where did this article come from, anyhow? If I had to draw a reasonable conclusion from it, I'd say that MOST people that would call themselves "very attractive" (from either gender) tend to be pretty self-absorbed and think they therefore have the right to be critical of other people's physical attributes. To me, a "very attractive" girl that considers a large penis a prize, (and not necessarily the person attached to it,) is just as pig-headed as a studly guy who considers an airhead with implants a real catch.

 

[Knight]

Yeah the women here are hot. The women that have been after me for my size have been okay to look at, I mean I wouldn't say they were knockouts but they were hot with HUGE tits. Which I like...but I didn't do anythin with them honest

I have an above average penis and am above average in looks, so I'm told. I do think it would be hard to be a size queen if you were ugly, unless you knew a lot of hung ugly men...and so of course a good looking size queen would have an advantage. But then of course there are exceptions...

 

[thirdlegmeat]

Originally posted by absinthium@Aug 13 2005, 11:25 PM
I don't see the relevance in quoting Thomas keeping-my-own-children-as-slaves-after-I-raped-their-mother Jefferson on equal treatment, but I'm sure that's just because I'm one of those silly, overly-sensitive quadroons.

Ahem...

I would count myself as above-average in attractiveness, and I'd much rather be with a caring, skilled partner than one who just had a huge dick. Gigantic dicks are adorable and everything, but I honestly don't see what all the fuss is about.

Where did this article come from, anyhow? If I had to draw a reasonable conclusion from it, I'd say that MOST people that would call themselves "very attractive" (from either gender) tend to be pretty self-absorbed and think they therefore have the right to be critical of other people's physical attributes. To me, a "very attractive" girl that considers a large penis a prize, (and not necessarily the person attached to it,) is just as pig-headed as a studly guy who considers an airhead with implants a real catch.

[post=335247]Quoted post[/post]​

You have a good point, and that's exactly why I asked for opinions.
However, I think it is also understood by objective people, that EVERYTHING comes down to economics. People with more money can affored nicer cars and homes. Likewise, women with better "looks" can demand more successful, better-hung (fill in the blank) men. Remember that economics is the deciding factor in everything and currency can be any attribute--not just money--that is in demand.

Therefore, I still say that better-looking women can demand better-endowed men, if that is indeed their desire. And if a woman truly is beautiful, she doesn't have to settle for personality over cock size, or vice-versa. The two are NOT mutually exclusive. A goddess can demand it all.

Am I wrong?

 

[nark29]

Well i'd think if the "good looking woman" or whatever found a guy she couldn't resist and loved talking to and got all happy being around, then penis size wouldn't be an issue... it's not like she'll be like "oh well even though you're the best thing that's happened to me, you're half an inch smaller then the smallest size i'll take, time to go fuck the hung guy that is fun to be with, but not as fun as you. ;o

 

[SurferGirlCA]

To clarify my earlier post, I would choose an accomplished/considerate lover with a smaller endowment over a well-hung guy who didn't really take the time to make sure I was feeling as good as he was. Inconsiderate or just plain ignorant lovers exist, male and female, well-endowed and not. I am not sure that the women in the survey who think of themselves as "very attractive" means they walk around 24/7 with a mirror in front of their faces. On the other hand, low self-esteem does certainly have an impact on what someone feels they are worthy of having in their life, whether it be in a relationship, a job, friendships, etc. I think thirdlegmeat's point was that he was heartened to hear that at least some portion of women who apparently have some level of self-esteem expressed a preference for a well-endowed guy. Personally, I think that might be coded to mean "good lover" - and who doesn't want that?? :*

 

[citygirl]

Originally posted by thirdlegmeat@Aug 13 2005, 12:02 AM
I recently read a study that said women who highly prize large penis size also rate themselves as "very attractive." On the other hand, women who rate themselves as "average," "less attractive," etc., correspondingly negate the importance of penis size in a partner.

I find this terribly interesting. Obviously I have some motivation to want this to be true But beyond that, I beleive this observation gives us profound insight into the legitmate importance of size. Essentially what this tells us is that women who are beautiful enough to "catch" a well-endowed man indeed search for large appendages--almost as if they deserve a "hung" man. But women who perhaps can't "catch" the big fish, settle for a small fry. This is a generality, of course.

Opinions?

[post=335054]Quoted post[/post]​

Then what does Melania see in Donald Trump? I doubt he has a big dick (let alone one that works without Viagra). :shrug:

 

[naughty]

Originally posted by citygirl+Aug 14 2005, 09:39 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(citygirl &#064; Aug 14 2005, 09:39 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-thirdlegmeat@Aug 13 2005, 12:02 AM
I recently read a study that said women who highly prize large penis size also rate themselves as "very attractive." On the other hand, women who rate themselves as "average," "less attractive," etc.,  correspondingly negate the importance of penis size in a partner.

I find this terribly interesting. Obviously I have some motivation to want this to be true But beyond that, I beleive this observation gives us profound insight into the legitmate importance of size. Essentially what this tells us is that women who are beautiful enough to "catch" a well-endowed man indeed search for large appendages--almost as if they deserve a "hung" man. But women who perhaps can&#39;t "catch" the big fish, settle for a small fry. This is a generality, of course.

Opinions?

[post=335054]Quoted post[/post]​

Then what does Melania see in Donald Trump? I doubt he has a big dick (let alone one that works without Viagra). :shrug:

[post=335375]Quoted post[/post]​

[/b][/quote]


To answer your question, I will quote the theme song from "The Apprentice" an old R&B standard... "Money, money, money, money... Mo-ney&#33; "

Naughty

 

[citygirl]

Originally posted by naughty+Aug 14 2005, 05:52 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(naughty &#064; Aug 14 2005, 05:52 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'>

Originally posted by citygirl@Aug 14 2005, 09:39 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-thirdlegmeat

@Aug 13 2005, 12:02 AM
I recently read a study that said women who highly prize large penis size also rate themselves as "very attractive." On the other hand, women who rate themselves as "average," "less attractive," etc.,  correspondingly negate the importance of penis size in a partner.

I find this terribly interesting. Obviously I have some motivation to want this to be true But beyond that, I beleive this observation gives us profound insight into the legitmate importance of size. Essentially what this tells us is that women who are beautiful enough to "catch" a well-endowed man indeed search for large appendages--almost as if they deserve a "hung" man. But women who perhaps can&#39;t "catch" the big fish, settle for a small fry. This is a generality, of course.

Opinions?

[post=335054]Quoted post[/post]​

Then what does Melania see in Donald Trump? I doubt he has a big dick (let alone one that works without Viagra). :shrug:

[post=335375]Quoted post[/post]​

To answer your question, I will quote the theme song from "The Apprentice" an old R&B standard... "Money, money, money, money... Mo-ney&#33; "

Naughty

[post=335378]Quoted post[/post]​

[/b][/quote]

Yup, she&#39;s in it for the &#036;&#036;. She can obviously do better. Is &#39;Golddigger&#39; 1 word or 2? :toast:

 

[rope9839]

Originally posted by citygirl+Aug 14 2005, 09:57 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(citygirl &#064; Aug 14 2005, 09:57 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'>

Originally posted by naughty@Aug 14 2005, 05:52 AM

Originally posted by citygirl@Aug 14 2005, 09:39 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-thirdlegmeat

@Aug 13 2005, 12:02 AM
I recently read a study that said women who highly prize large penis size also rate themselves as "very attractive." On the other hand, women who rate themselves as "average," "less attractive," etc., correspondingly negate the importance of penis size in a partner.

I find this terribly interesting. Obviously I have some motivation to want this to be true But beyond that, I beleive this observation gives us profound insight into the legitmate importance of size. Essentially what this tells us is that women who are beautiful enough to "catch" a well-endowed man indeed search for large appendages--almost as if they deserve a "hung" man. But women who perhaps can&#39;t "catch" the big fish, settle for a small fry. This is a generality, of course.

Opinions?

[post=335054]Quoted post[/post]​

Then what does Melania see in Donald Trump? I doubt he has a big dick (let alone one that works without Viagra). :shrug:

[post=335375]Quoted post[/post]​

To answer your question, I will quote the theme song from "The Apprentice" an old R&B standard... "Money, money, money, money... Mo-ney&#33; "

Naughty

[post=335378]Quoted post[/post]​

Yup, she&#39;s in it for the &#036;&#036;. She can obviously do better. Is &#39;Golddigger&#39; 1 word or 2? :toast:

[post=335380]Quoted post[/post]​

[/b][/quote]


Rumor has it he is also hung like a farm animal. I guess that is just the icing on the cake.

 

[thirdlegmeat]

Originally posted by rope9839+Aug 14 2005, 02:23 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(rope9839 &#064; Aug 14 2005, 02:23 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>

Originally posted by citygirl@Aug 14 2005, 09:57 AM

Originally posted by naughty@Aug 14 2005, 05:52 AM

Originally posted by citygirl@Aug 14 2005, 09:39 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-thirdlegmeat

@Aug 13 2005, 12:02 AM
I recently read a study that said women who highly prize large penis size also rate themselves as "very attractive." On the other hand, women who rate themselves as "average," "less attractive," etc.,  correspondingly negate the importance of penis size in a partner.

I find this terribly interesting. Obviously I have some motivation to want this to be true But beyond that, I beleive this observation gives us profound insight into the legitmate importance of size. Essentially what this tells us is that women who are beautiful enough to "catch" a well-endowed man indeed search for large appendages--almost as if they deserve a "hung" man. But women who perhaps can&#39;t "catch" the big fish, settle for a small fry. This is a generality, of course.

Opinions?

[post=335054]Quoted post[/post]​

Then what does Melania see in Donald Trump? I doubt he has a big dick (let alone one that works without Viagra). :shrug:

[post=335375]Quoted post[/post]​

To answer your question, I will quote the theme song from "The Apprentice" an old R&B standard... "Money, money, money, money... Mo-ney&#33; "

Naughty

[post=335378]Quoted post[/post]​

Yup, she&#39;s in it for the &#036;&#036;. She can obviously do better. Is &#39;Golddigger&#39; 1 word or 2? :toast:

[post=335380]Quoted post[/post]​

Rumor has it he is also hung like a farm animal. I guess that is just the icing on the cake.

[post=335409]Quoted post[/post]​

[/b][/quote]


I appreciate everyone&#39;s input on this, since I do find it interesting. I think that SurferGirl probably presented my view best. Thanks

As far a guys with money. OF COURSE they are going to have many beautiful women throwing themselves at them (call it gold-digging, whatever you will).
However, I would be willing to bet that even in high-society social groups, you still have the men who are known to be hung. It is likely whispered through the ballroom halls and elite lounges of the Hamptons. I would go even further and suggest that many of the women with extremely wealthy, unattractive or small-endowed men are likely "experimenting" with other "hung" guys on the side.

No, being well-endowed is NOT the most important factor in a relationship. But I do think that it is a prized commodity that every woman thinks is a nice benefit if she happens to be lucky enough to find it.

 

[absinthium]

Originally posted by thirdlegmeat@Aug 13 2005, 10:17 PM
However, I think it is also understood by objective people, that EVERYTHING comes down to economics. People with more money can affored nicer cars and homes. Likewise, women with better "looks" can demand more successful, better-hung (fill in the blank) men. Remember that economics is the deciding factor in everything and currency can be any attribute--not just money--that is in demand.

Umm... That might be true for some people, but I sincerely hope people care more about who somebody is than just their monetary assests or physical attributes. I&#39;d rather be with a poor, smaller-dicked guy who was kind, creative, loving, and intelligent myself. Perhaps I am the exception to the rule? I happen to believe people have a lot more to offer than the material, but whatever. Maybe everyone is just as shallow as I&#39;ve been led to believe.

Therefore, I still say that better-looking women can demand better-endowed men, if that is indeed their desire. And if a woman truly is beautiful, she doesn&#39;t have to settle for personality over cock size, or vice-versa. The two are NOT mutually exclusive.

[post=335295]Quoted post[/post]​

In the event that the two were mutually exclusive, just for purely hypothetical purposes, I still don&#39;t see why choosing personality over cock is settling. I also don&#39;t see how just being physically attractive would qualify a woman as a goddess...
Who knows.
I give up.

 

[Karen M]

Absinthium, you&#39;re no exception to the rule. It&#39;s just that most men don&#39;t get it&#33; lol It&#39;s just a shame how many women seem to fall into that category as well. I&#39;m still convinced that you and I aren&#39;t exceptions.

:happy: Karen

 

[thirdlegmeat]

The point of this thread was to express the possiblity that women may care more about penis size than "Cosmopolitan" or Dr. Drew would suggest. It was never meant to be a blanket statement asserting that penis size is the most important male attribute for women. I think that most everyone knows that women most value personality, ambition, loyalty, sensitivity, etc. Physically, I think that most everyone knows women most value a handsome face, adequate height, pretty eyes, etc.

I don&#39;t believe that anything I previously stated conflicts with the premise referenced above. However, I do believe that people have a knee-jerk reaction whenever someone suggests the importance of penis size. Obviously this is a sensitive subject for some less-endowed men, and evidently even those without penises at all (women). Go figure.

 

[jonb]

Originally posted by thirdlegmeat@Aug 14 2005, 08:42 AM
As far a guys with money. OF COURSE they are going to have many beautiful women throwing themselves at them (call it gold-digging, whatever you will).
However, I would be willing to bet that even in high-society social groups, you still have the men who are known to be hung. It is likely whispered through the ballroom halls and elite lounges of the Hamptons. I would go even further and suggest that many of the women with extremely wealthy, unattractive or small-endowed men are likely "experimenting" with other "hung" guys on the side.

[post=335423]Quoted post[/post]​

Too true. A current fad in Hollywood&#39;s older women with younger men, sometimes as much as 15 years&#39; difference. As a rule, when you&#39;re rich, you can afford to have paramours for no reason other than sex. Why? Because you can afford it, and because rich people do things which would shock those of us of more modest income. Then we react to that shock by voting for people who plan to "return to traditional values", whatever the hell THAT means, and they give said rich people tax cuts out the wazoo.