Here's a link to a study performed by a Russian academic that suggests a relationship between phallus size and success, as well as sexual conquests. It even cites rare examples of atypical small-endowed successful men such as Napolean. However, remember that Napolean also couldn't hang onto the woman he loved who rejected him for his more masculine--and no doubt better-endowed--general.
http://www.geocities.com/protopop_1999/phalluse.html
I'm neither ignorant nor stupid. I have many female friends, as well as a sister. I've had close romantic relationships with women where we've discussed penis size in detail. And I will never be convinced that a woman with a small-endowed male is completely satisfied with its size. She may be satisfied with the man as a "total package," but she still desires a larger penis. Lack of size by it's own virtue is effiminate. Are there more important features in a man. Of course there are! However, more attractive women can be more selective in EVERY way. They don't have to settle for trade-offs. This may not be comforting, but it's true. Pure economics. To suggest otherwise is an absurd escape from reality.
http://www.geocities.com/protopop_1999/phalluse.html
I'm neither ignorant nor stupid. I have many female friends, as well as a sister. I've had close romantic relationships with women where we've discussed penis size in detail. And I will never be convinced that a woman with a small-endowed male is completely satisfied with its size. She may be satisfied with the man as a "total package," but she still desires a larger penis. Lack of size by it's own virtue is effiminate. Are there more important features in a man. Of course there are! However, more attractive women can be more selective in EVERY way. They don't have to settle for trade-offs. This may not be comforting, but it's true. Pure economics. To suggest otherwise is an absurd escape from reality.