Madonna thoughts of "blowing up the white house"

[Chrysippus]

^ I wouldn't be surprised if Madonna would wear these terms as badges of honor.

Who cares if you're surprised or not?

 

[LittleBuzzSaw]

Looking at the content of @LittleBuzzSaw's previous posts, you'd be better off not to engage him and just to move on. I think you're expecting an intelligent, rational exchange with him, and you haven't gotten it--no one has.

Others illiteracy isn't my concern. I have substantiated everything I have said with fact.

 

[Jjz1109]

Who cares if you're surprised or not?

Lol. Feel better?

 

[LittleBuzzSaw]

Lol. Feel better?

ROTFLMAO

 

[LittleBuzzSaw]

I think he's butthurt because I called one of his idols a stable whore and said I wanted to k**k her t***h in for referring to an act of domestic terrorism; when in reality I would have said it about anyone making those statements.

 

[Klingsor]

Google it.

OK, thanks. I learned a couple things about the Madonna-Whore complex, but nothing specific about Madonna as a "stable whore" (whatever that means.)

As for the blow job offer, you know that was to introduce a stand-up comedian, right?

 

[LittleBuzzSaw]

OK, thanks. I learned a couple things about the Madonna-Whore complex, but nothing specific about Madonna as a "stable whore" (whatever that means.)

As for the blow job offer, you know that was to introduce a stand-up comedian, right?

Yea. I do. Even still, that's a trashy thing to say, regardless of the gender of the speaker or the context.

 

[Chrysippus]

I think he's butthurt because I called one of his idols a stable whore and said I wanted to k**k her t***h in for referring to an act of domestic terrorism; when in reality I would have said it about anyone making those statements.

I detest Madonna, but I'm not about to advocate curb checking her or anyone else.

 

[Klingsor]

Yea. I do. Even still, that's a trashy thing to say, regardless of the gender of the speaker or the context.

 

[LittleBuzzSaw]

Madonna would be a good fit for them. God I hated that song (and Confederate Railroad).

 

[deleted15807]

Another attempt to avoid the subject of your hypocrisy.

All that has been asked of you is to explain why you have a double standard.

Do not expect an answer. It's a part of The Game played here for years.

 

[LittleBuzzSaw]

I detest Madonna, but I'm not about to advocate curb checking her or anyone else.

I understand your point. Likewise I refuse to remain silent when anyone (regardless of gender, social status, or political affiliation) talks about b****** up the WH.

 

[nickinoo]

I understand your point. Likewise I refuse to remain silent when anyone (regardless of gender, social status, or political affiliation) talks about b****** up the WH.

She was irresponsible for what she said, and she just made herself sound stupid. Even I had some respect for her until her speech, and I can't stand her.

 

[798686]

'skank'? 'a bit of a slut'? No male with whom the right-wing haters on this site disagree are called sluts or skanks. You're another hypocrite.

Really? If a male walked round with his bollocks hanging out half the time - he'd be decried as either a creep, a criminal or at least a perv.

Also, Trump was (rightly) shamed for claiming to grab women by the pussy. He did not offer to lick people out if they voted for him - which is the equivalent of what Madonna said. Nor does he parade around getting his kit off at every opportunity - or forcibly french-kiss people against their will (Drake). Can you imagine? A man would be arrested for that. A woman would not.

He does, however, do that thing of having trophy partners several decades his junior - and it's just as creepy when he does it, as when she does. It's not ageism - it's the fact that it's inappropriate and unstable for your kids, and shows a tendency to put oneself first (as Trump and Madge both do), and also slightly taking advantage of the younger person. Altho... at a basic level it can be seen as a transaction - Madge & Trump buy fresh meat in return for what their partners require, which is money and reflected fame.

No males have been called sluts or skanks? Anthony Wiener has - and rightly so. However, he exposes himself less frequently than Madonna, and basically ruined his career over it. It made hers. Another, less popularly accepted form of sexism?

I'm disappointed by both Madonna and Trump - and for the record, I'm not right wing. Despite Madonna's talents, intellect and savvy, she does display a worrying habit of hitting out at anyone or anything who disapproves of her, or stops her putting herself first and getting what she wants. Sometimes she's right, sometimes not - but she's consistently selfish.

The latest one? 'Why can't I maintain my popularity at my age, and also behave however the hell I like, and grab everything I want, with no recourse to how it affects anyone else?' Well, you can - but don't expect to escape criticism for it, and don't bother blaming it on ageism, or misogyny, or whatever the hell else trips off the tongue lightly.

 

[798686]

OK, thanks. I learned a couple things about the Madonna-Whore complex, but nothing specific about Madonna as a "stable whore" (whatever that means.)

As for the blow job offer, you know that was to introduce a stand-up comedian, right?

What if she'd offered to grab Amy Schumer by the pussy? Is that more acceptable than when Trump says it?

 

[Chrysippus]

Really? If a male walked round with his bollocks hanging out half the time - he'd be decried as either a creep, a criminal or at least a perv.

Also, Trump was (rightly) shamed for claiming to grab women by the pussy. He did not offer to lick people out if they voted for him - which is the equivalent of what Madonna said. Nor does he parade around getting his kit off at every opportunity - or forcibly french-kiss people against their will (Drake). Can you imagine? A man would be arrested for that. A woman would not.

He does, however, do that thing of having trophy partners several decades his junior - and it's just as creepy when he does it, as when she does. It's not ageism - it's the fact that it's inappropriate and unstable for your kids, and shows a tendency to put oneself first (as Trump and Madge both do), and also slightly taking advantage of the younger person. Altho... at a basic level it can be seen as a transaction - Madge & Trump buy fresh meat in return for what their partners require, which is money and reflected fame.

No males have been called sluts or skanks? Anthony Wiener has - and rightly so. However, he exposes himself less frequently than Madonna, and basically ruined his career over it. It made hers. Another, less popularly accepted form of sexism?

I'm disappointed by both Madonna and Trump - and for the record, I'm not right wing. Despite Madonna's talents, intellect and savvy, she does display a worrying habit of hitting out at anyone or anything who disapproves of her, or stops her putting herself first and getting what she wants. Sometimes she's right, sometimes not - but she's consistently selfish.

The latest one? 'Why can't I maintain my popularity at my age, and also behave however the hell I like, and grab everything I want, with no recourse to how it affects anyone else?' Well, you can - but don't expect to escape criticism for it, and don't bother blaming it on ageism, or misogyny, or whatever the hell else trips off the tongue lightly.

You're hilarious...thanks for the amusement.

 

[Klingsor]

What if she'd offered to grab Amy Schumer by the pussy? Is that more acceptable than when Trump says it?

If she made the offer in front of a large audience as part of a stand-up comedy routine, yes it's more acceptable. If she just went ahead and actually grabbed Amy Schumer by the pussy in private, without consent--as Trump claims to have done to multiple women--then no, it's not more acceptable.

 

[798686]

You're hilarious...thanks for the amusement.

Not good enough.

Try answering properly.

 

[b.c.]

I detest Madonna, but I'm not about to advocate curb checking her or anyone else.

It has nothing to do about liking or not liking a celebrity or Madonna herself. It has to do with free speech. It ALSO has to do with conservatives' USUAL ploy to take whatever bit of something they can to twist it into something that allows them to condemn liberals. In this case, THEY chose to focus on just the mention of "blowing up the White House" while ignoring the REAL message.

They do this because it furthers their agenda. And they're fkng HYPOCRITES about it.

Nugent spoke of shooting Obama on two occasions. The usual sorts here didn't say S**** about it. Trump himself made certain suggestions about what "2nd Amendment people" might do. They didn't say S***** about that EITHER.

They use conservative terminology bandied about by the likes of Limbaugh, O'Reilly, Hannity, and those of that persuasion, like "snowflake" then tell us some b.s. story of how they've been using it for years. No, it just proves what kind of drivel drives their particular MENTALITY.

And SURPRISE SURPRISE. They, like O'Reilly, Hannity, Giuliani and COMPANY, ALSO think Obama is unpatriotic and un-American.

I guarantee, these people have NEVER said or even THOUGHT such a thing about ANY other American president. Not a fkng ONE of them.

And I, for one DON'T have to wonder WHY... in SPITE of their feigned indignation.

 

[Chrysippus]

Not good enough.
Try answering properly.

Your post was an expression of your opinions, which I found very amusing. The only questions in your post are those which you asked, then answered, or were rhetorical: therefore no answer is necessary.