Magnetic resonance imaging of male and female genitals during coitus and female sexua

Discussion in 'Sex With a Large Penis' started by penisaurus, Mar 29, 2007.

  1. penisaurus

    penisaurus New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2005
    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    0
    #1 penisaurus, Mar 29, 2007
  2. wispandex_bulge

    wispandex_bulge Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2004
    Messages:
    387
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Ah crap... I thought this woudl be interesting, but i am a chemist not a biologist. Nothing funky about these MRI images, which are actually spatial NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance). For the edification of the chemiscally inept, the iages are generated by looking at the hydrogen nuclei of water molecules.

    For a challenge: We cannost see heavy water (with deutirium) in the same picture. Care to explain why?
     
    #2 wispandex_bulge, Mar 29, 2007
  3. Spamalot

    Spamalot New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2006
    Messages:
    94
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    "Midsagittal image of the anatomy of sexual intercourse envisaged by R L Dickinson"

    That made my day.
     
    #3 Spamalot, Mar 29, 2007
  4. dongalong

    dongalong
    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2004
    Messages:
    6,102
    Likes Received:
    4,106
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Paris (FR)
    Good find penisaurus, I always wanted to know where my cock went in relation to all the bits inside a woman. You can even see the rough g-spot area.
     
    #4 dongalong, Mar 29, 2007
  5. tripod

    tripod
    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2006
    Messages:
    5,616
    Albums:
    4
    Likes Received:
    759
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    United States
    If you read the thing... it says that none of the women had anything that resembled a G-spot and exhibited none of the characteristics of being able to dispense some sort of ejaculatory fluid... all 13 female subjects reported that their orgasms were "superficial"

    Hmmm... not very good news... I too, would like to see the same MRI imaging with a man with a large penis. Maybe we need to wait until they develop better equipment, because the researchers were impeded by a lame signal to noise ratio which contained too much noise and grain to produce clear images that allowed them to see all the aspects of coitus that they were looking for.

    The female bladder filling during sex was way too wierd though...
     
    #5 tripod, Mar 29, 2007
  6. ericbear

    ericbear
    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2002
    Messages:
    1,163
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    350
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Santa Ana (CA, US)
    The added proton of Deuterium changes the magnetic moment of the nucleus, and hence the resonant frequency. Therefore, either a different magnetic field stength or different RF frequency is needed to image Deuterium. The first MRI images made by Paul Lauterbur exploited this fact, imaging the contrast between normal and heavy water.

    Now, which elements are impossible to image by MRI?
     
    #6 ericbear, Mar 30, 2007
  7. punk09

    punk09
    Verified Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    600
    Albums:
    8
    Likes Received:
    2,664
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    San Francisco (CA, US)
    Verified:
    Photo
    funny how they say that 22cm root + pendulous is enormous.

    if i measure from the root of my cock that runs from near my asshole, which gets as hard as my pendulous shaft, up to the tip of my hardon, i get like 34cm.
     
    #7 punk09, Mar 30, 2007
  8. LeeEJ

    LeeEJ
    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Messages:
    1,470
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    7
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    DC
    That says "horny lab geeks" to me... :wink:
     
    #8 LeeEJ, Mar 30, 2007
  9. JustAsking

    JustAsking
    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2004
    Messages:
    3,249
    Likes Received:
    5
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Ohio
    Because the Larmor frequency is different for deutirium than it is with water. It has two protons, which changes the ratio of the magnetic dipole strenght vs the spin angular momentum of the nucleus. What do I win?

    Oh never mind. I see ericbear beat me to it. I lose.
     
    #9 JustAsking, Mar 30, 2007
  10. cute5

    cute5 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2005
    Messages:
    166
    Likes Received:
    1
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    North Texas
    Just a guess, the hydrogen in heavy water has one neutron (which regular hydrogen does not) and neutrons are not detectable.
     
    #10 cute5, Apr 1, 2007
  11. B_big dirigible

    B_big dirigible New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2005
    Messages:
    2,739
    Likes Received:
    1
    Added proton? That would make deuterium an isotope of helium, which it ain't.
     
    #11 B_big dirigible, Apr 1, 2007
  12. JustAsking

    JustAsking
    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2004
    Messages:
    3,249
    Likes Received:
    5
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Ohio
    big-D,
    You are completely right. Deuterium has a neutron where hydrogen doesn't. This still causes a shift in the Larmor frequency, though, doesn't it?
     
    #12 JustAsking, Apr 1, 2007
Draft saved Draft deleted