Male "brothel" question for you ladies.

[Not_Punny]

Lonely, old, wealthy, and desperate. :frown1: The kind of woman whose family or ex-husband makes the Fortune 500 lists annually. The kind of woman who needs an escort for her numerous black tie invitations. They sometimes call these men 'walkers'. It's an easy and lucrative way for a handsome, intelligent, yet ultimately lazy man to earn a decent living.

I wondered what dog walkers were... :biggrin1:

 

[B_KOKOBWARE]

being a germaphobe, i wouldn't touch this situation with a ten-inch pole. Any "extras" in my relationship have to have a long term partner with a long-term clean medical history and recent test results. Condoms alone are no guarantee.

So a brothel situation is out of the question.

And while i'm not adverse to man-on-man-oral during a threesome, i would probably leave the room and throw up if i saw a guy fucking another guy. I think anal is gross and unhygienic. As far as i'm concerned, the minute anal happens, the party is over until everything is scrubbed clean... Preferably with lysol.

exactly!

 

[honeydew]

IF I were to entertain this, I would prefer a male who had not been with men. I think anal is gross and don't want anything to do with it.
I would not have a problem paying for a male. I am through with real relationships but still am very sexual so i think it would be fun(if all were tested often, etc)

 

[D_Inglethorp Rumpshow]

It seems strange that a woman would pay for something that they've probably been offered on a daily basis. I didn't watch "Hung" on HBO because it seemed too far fetched...

 

[Daisy]

The whole idea of a woman paying for sex is not that she can't get it for free. Unless you're really hideous, most women could get laid by 5 different guys daily. The point of paying a man is walking into a room, having the men line up, pointing to the one you want, and saying yes, I want that one, and spending a certain amount of time having him do EXACTLY what you want and then leave. It's not about getting sex it's about having power over a man. Women are used to having to play the nice girl, making sure we don't give it up too soon to ruin our chances of it turning into a relationship, we have to act a certain way, stroke his fragile ego, make sure we don't come across as too demanding, or too slutty, or too experienced or not enough. It would be kinda fun to just say "do this, do that, bye bye!" If we are talking about a fantasy world where the guy is squeaky clean and I couldn't get any kind of disease and he looked like, let's say Mario Lopez, then yeah why not!
By the way the only thing that would really make me feel weird and sad is if I had to pay a guy for his companionship. Now THAT, is depressing to me.

 

[AlteredEgo]

The whole idea of a woman paying for sex is not that she can't get it for free. Unless you're really hideous, most women could get laid by 5 different guys daily. The point of paying a man is walking into a room, having the men line up, pointing to the one you want, and saying yes, I want that one, and spending a certain amount of time having him do EXACTLY what you want and then leave. It's not about getting sex it's about having power over a man. Women are used to having to play the nice girl, making sure we don't give it up too soon to ruin our chances of it turning into a relationship, we have to act a certain way, stroke his fragile ego, make sure we don't come across as too demanding, or too slutty, or too experienced or not enough. It would be kinda fun to just say "do this, do that, bye bye!" If we are talking about a fantasy world where the guy is squeaky clean and I couldn't get any kind of disease and he looked like, let's say Mario Lopez, then yeah why not!
By the way the only thing that would really make me feel weird and sad is if I had to pay a guy for his companionship. Now THAT, is depressing to me.

I never had to pay anyone to have exactly what you say is the point of paying. When I was single, I tried to keep a steady roster of four men I could count on for just that. Give me EXACTLY what I want, and then I'm leaving. Sometimes "EXACTLY what I want" would include a fun outing before the sex, and sometimes I would have them come to my house instead. I never had to pay for this. Whenever I was interested in a man for a relationship, I just kept fucking my four friends, and abstained with him. (That works like a charm.)

Perhaps this is why I just can't seem to get past the "paying for sex" part. If the question is "can you sleep with a former prostitute who has had sex with men?" My answer is yes. But if the question involves me giving up my hard-won cash? Hell muthafuckin' no!

 

[bigbull29]

People in our culture really underestimate women's sexual attraction to the male body. I've always heard that women are not that visually stimulated and really aren't as "sexual" as men. Male strippers just make women giggle and and male prostitutes are just for gay men. While there are differences between men and women, there are more similarities between the two sexes than you'd ever imagine. I think that society plays on this to keep women down and under the power of male heterosexuality.

 

[3664shaken]

but i'm turned off by bi men, if that's the real question. don't ask me why because i don't know.

Same here

 

[curiouslady]

Well, this has been a very interesting and enlightening posting to read. I've learned a couple of things:

1. Distaste that I'm turned off by bi men is not my "hangup" solely.
2. My aversion to having intimate contact with men who have had gay experiences is not necessarily my "problem" alone.


To answer the original posters question:

YES, if I could be assured of MY personal safety, I'd pay for sex IF I could chose EXACTLY what I WANTED....(but that may be because I'm in a social/economic strata that enables me to pick and chose MUCH of what I want in life, NOT bragging, just saying that money-or the lack of it-is not that much of a factor in my life.)

(Actually, I have a reoccurring "fantasy-dream" that is based exactly on this question...I walk in, I look at the "merchandise and equipment", I pick the one or two (wink) that I want, we get it on for 2-4 hours, I walk out and go back to my regular life. Never fails to bring a smile to my face!)

Interesting question for sure!

CL

 

[D_Thithians Boatleg]

I can't get past the prostitution part.

I'm probably part of a minority here (gender wise) but I completely agree

 

[helgaleena]

I do not dislike men with men. I do not dislike anal. I do dislike anyone forcing themselves to be intimate with me simply because it is their job. They have to be pretending.

I do not want to diminish those for whom sex is a job, as it is an ancient and often honorable and sophisiticated profession. But I personally prefer to have sex with a lover or at least a friend.

 

[Wish-4-8]

I do not dislike men with men. I do not dislike anal. I do dislike anyone forcing themselves to be intimate with me simply because it is their job. They have to be pretending.

I do not want to diminish those for whom sex is a job, as it is an ancient and often honorable and sophisiticated profession. But I personally prefer to have sex with a lover or at least a friend.

Housewives have been doing that for centuries out of fear and obligation. :frown1:

 

[Wish-4-8]

Great responses everyone. I dont want to single anyone one out because they are all great.

I guess this has split into two questions.
"As a women, would you pay for sex?"
and the original question,
"If you are paying for sex, would you perfer that your partner only service women?"

I didnt anticipate the "paying for sex" to be such an issue. But it is very interesting that it is.

 

[helgaleena]

Housewives have been doing that for centuries out of fear and obligation. :frown1:

Not MY spouse, Wish. maybe yours?? hope not...

 

[Wish-4-8]

Not MY spouse, Wish. maybe yours?? hope not...

I am glad for your situation, but your husband is not a housewife. LOL

I was just pointing out that people, often times, more than likely it is the case of the woman, have to pretend to enjoy the intimicy with an abusive husband. They better put on a good show or else...

BTW. I dont have a spouse. :redface:

 

[Enid]

I guess this has split into two questions.
"As a women, would you pay for sex?"
and the original question,
"If you are paying for sex, would you prefer that your partner only service women?"

oh ok, well my answer to the 1st question is no. i would not pay for sex.

the 2nd question then becomes hypothetical, and my answer to it is no. i don't care what sex the person has been with as long as there are condoms and dental dams for everything plus rigorous comprehensive STD testing (gonorrhea; hepatitis; chlamydia; HIV; herpes; syphilis).

 

[helgaleena]

I don't have a husband either, anymore. I was going to say 'not MY wife' but this is LPSG, lol...

That would be yet a third topic, whether marriage is economic slavery of some kind under all the hearts and flowers.

 

[woodyq]

oh ok, well my answer to the 1st question is no. i would not pay for sex.

the 2nd question then becomes hypothetical, and my answer to it is no. i don't care what sex the person has been with as long as there are condoms and dental dams for everything plus rigorous comprehensive STD testing (gonorrhea; hepatitis; chlamydia; HIV; herpes; syphilis).

see enid the thing is a rigorous test with a girl i met and have been dating a few months but not having sex with (and if she tells me she has not been having sex with anyone else) is one thing.

the 90 HIV window is kind of a problem if these guys (and in my case girls) are having sex with 5 people a day and therefore 450 partners potentially with HIV that woule NOT show up on today's test, right?