Mandigo is crap. Lets be honest.

B_ScaredLittleBoy

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2007
Posts
3,235
Media
0
Likes
19
Points
183
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Scaredlilttleboy wrote: Mine is rooted in chemistry. Mandingo has no chemistry and the girls look like they're just there for the money. In Julian scenes they both look like they're enjoying it.


Yeah, Ok they're in it for the joy of sex and not a paycheck!!!!!!!!!!! Rolls Eyes!!

Are you sure you can read? Or are you just guessing?

Allowing for the obvious pretence of porn, Julian STILL has more of a rapport with his co-performers. Mandingo just has a big dick. Julian has a big dick, good looks and good sexual chemistry with is fellow P stars.

I'm not so into cock size that I'd sacrifice passion and hot sex for some guy with a donkey cock that either doesn't know how to use it or can't use it.

Is it clear now?
 

dongalong

Mythical Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2004
Posts
16,290
Media
0
Likes
62,405
Points
418
Location
France
Gender
Male
Who is the porn industry standard setter and what do they do that Mandingo doesn't?

I can't ever remember being disappointed by his performance in the same way that I have been with Tony T or Ron Jeremy.

To call him crap is a bit excessive but I'd have to agree his performance isn't in the same league as Rocco Siffredi (when he's not beating up the actresses!!!) for example.
 

stamrod

Sexy Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2007
Posts
228
Media
11
Likes
31
Points
163
Location
Houston, TX
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I have to agree. After the slight wow factor wears off, I'm not that impressed by his scenes. He just shoves it in and thinks thats all there is to it. I feel he lives off his size more than most other porn stars.

Personally, I wouldn't be happy with a cock as big as his. It'll scare most girls off and the one's that aren't scared off aren't usually long term relationship material.
 

grumpyguy

Cherished Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Posts
112
Media
10
Likes
271
Points
418
Location
santa barbara, ca
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Mandingo is a physical wonder. I get the feeling he is also a professional; that is he does his job, then goes home and watches TV. I could be wrong but I don't think he got into porn as a lifelong dream. He doesn't seem to have a passion for it. I think he had other plans for his life but the porn industry and his penis were just too made for each other. That's my impression anyway.

He is what he is, a modestly attractive black man with a nice body and a penis that is, I think, the biggest the porn industry has ever seen. It's shape, length, and girth are a wonder to behold. Unlike porn stars half his size, he gets hard and stays hard throughout. Only his ejaculations are about average. Also he seems willing to do almost everything in mainstream straight porn.

Some of his costars have complained about his size. As a result, he approaches every scene with caution. He can never mount a woman close-up and furiously fuck her like other male porn actors. In addition, the star of his scenes is his prodigious penis and so I think directors try to keep it in the shot as much as possible. That further limits the positions, spontaneity, and the overall fun of his scenes.

As a straight man, I have to admit to being a fan. I can't help but wonder what my sex life would be with a member like that. With Mandingo, for me, that is the fantasy, the essence of pornography. For romance, grunting, and incredible cum shots, there are other performers that fill those niches.

Anyone know of a serious interview done with Mandingo? It might further explain why his scenes don't thrill everyone.

A.
 

Tattooed Goddess

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Oct 17, 2007
Posts
14,088
Media
70
Likes
20,563
Points
668
Location
United States
Verification
View
Sexuality
60% Straight, 40% Gay
Gender
Female
well, in all fairness to the guy, his scenes are mostly about the "spectacle" of his size vs. the woman, not necessarily alot of action, for several reasons (IMO)

1. rarely are there women capable of handling even 3/4ths of it

2. he is actually considerate of his partners, since he his carefull not to do anything to hard that could hurt them, and let's face it, he could REALLY hurt a partner with that thing if he is not carefull! Lex said thihs as well, mainly because of the length.

3. he is only 5'9, but he has to maneuver something that is nearly a foot long, which certainly makes positioning a bit more difficult, especially since he is trying not to go more then 2/3rds - 3/4ths of the way in...sort of like having to drive an 18 wheeler...not quite the same as driving a ferrari, in terms of maneuverability and ability to do stuff with it.

Lex does well, but let's not forget that he is 6'2 with 9.5 5'9 with 11.5 (roughly) is a bit challenging.

4. most of his scenes are not really done creatively, since he is not much of an actor, and there are no POV or reality type ones...mostly it is just for the spectacle...think about it...a 5'2 girl with a near foot long thing...the pecker is nearly 1/5th as tall as she is.

5. being 5'9, and having a modest 7.25, the premise of having to wield something nearly 5 inches longer, to me is not too appealing...except maybe for the "WOW" factor for the girl. I like when I am at the furthest point away in doggy for example (head still in), that i do not have to move very far back in, thusly being able to move faster...I also like the feeling of being able to my pelvis against a woman's butt, and really feel full penetration, and the bouncing etc...he can never do that...imagine how many times the guy has been able to feel that in his life...probably not very often if ever.

so his size really limits his effectiveness in producing a great scene.

as i said, i think he is more porn spectacle, then porn super-performer.

he can never really go super fast the way someone like Erik Everhard does, and some positions are not going to work as well.

which inhibits the scene...

he is not "crap", there are just alot of limitations to what he can do with that thing.

while it is certainly an impressive thing, i would not be very happy from a satisfaction point of view (my own) if i could never ever in my life fit my whole thing inside a girl.

imagine going swimming and never being able to get 1/3rd of your body into the pool...

kind of takes the fun out of things a bit (IMO)

personally, i'd rather have the girth then the length.

given the choice between having as my own an 11.5 x 7 or a 7.5 by 7, I'll take the 7.5 thank you

:smile:

I totally agree with this. You made wonderful points that truly explained why i don't like to watch Mandingo. Guys who are smaller than Mandingo who think that women would enjoy their cocks if they were that large are crazy. I used to enjoy watching porn like this because i am a small girl and it was fascinating to see a woman be able to take him at all. Now that i've been on the boards for a bit, i've had a chance to get refined a bit in why i like my husbands cock. First being, i enjoy an average/larger than sized man who is actually having the woman enjoy herself with him. I don't enjoy the "I think i have a roast in the oven and i need to go check on it" look on the ladies faces when they are with a super long man. I've seen this look in porn when guys are truly a bad fuck no matter what the size of their cock.

You have average women who come to LPSG, not porn chicks, so we are giving you our honest opinion when we say *most* women wouldn't enjoy a dick of that calibur.

My husband is 7.5 by 7, and its a bitch to fit with that girth, but his length is PERFECT. Within a few minutes of good penetration i can pull up my knees and take him to the hilt. I love to feel his pelvis against my ass pounding me. While time positions I cant take him that deep, i feel so satisfied being able to bounce on him with my full weight and not impale myself to injury.

Let's face it, alot of porn is sexy because its unusual, most women don't eagerly await being ejaculated in the face/eyes/hair like the women on porns, we don't do ass to mouth, we don't do double penetration in one oriface (atleast i dont), we don't like to be spit on or tag teamed by a bunch of average looking men. Mandingo's appeal is the fact that its so unusual and every mans fantasy to be that big.

The fantasy to be that large lasts until you figure out the logic behind what you are able to do with it and your limitations. And not all guys like to pound ass that hard i realize, but deep into a good sex session I think its natural to want to push harder and harder until it wont go in any further.

Well thats my never to be humble opinion....from a woman who wouldnt change a thing about 7.5 by 7 that i have at home.
 

lgej

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2007
Posts
452
Media
0
Likes
17
Points
163
Location
CT
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
You're all giving this way to much thought. To ascribe a level of acting talent to almost any porn star (except maybe Randy Spears, Evan Stone, and the like) is spurious at best. Mandingo has, by the admission of almost every poster here, a visually appealing penis. Does he fuck like a god? I think not. But, for many (not all) is his dick a visually appealing fantasy item? I think so. As I mentioned earlier, my wife loves to look at him and see him fuck. Would she REALLY want to take him? No way...he wouldn't fit. But I bet she'd like to lick and suck him. That's his appeal, not whether he's a human piston or not. As to his partners, if they don't react much - I say it's their issue, not his.
 

D_kutecuyug

Experimental Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2007
Posts
324
Media
0
Likes
8
Points
163
Some situations demand pants - Dont you think ?

Anyway - Lexington Steele is better looking, better body, his cock looks bigger if not as thick - And he works the ladys much better... That is all!
 

millionman

Legendary Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2006
Posts
1,475
Media
0
Likes
1,505
Points
343
Location
United States
Gender
Male
Lexington Steele makes to WORST orgasm noise ever. It sounds like he's dying, quite literally.

Mandingo has a HUGE COCK, and that's all. You can rationalize it all you want and prop it up with some pseudo intellectual tripe, but the fact of the matter is the cock's the show.

Porn for me is about the woman, but the guy and the dick are secondary props to the scene.
 

stratedude

Legendary Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Jun 28, 2007
Posts
2,383
Media
16
Likes
1,076
Points
583
Location
Ohio
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
I think the problem I have with mandingo is that he is almost never willing to try to go balls deep. I'm sure in reality the girl tells him before hand, "OK go really shallow at first, and when I tap on you, that means it is starting to hurt" or something to that effect, which ends up making the scene look like he is not even willing to try a depth charge (lol). I'd like to think I am being overly critical, but then I can't explain why a guy like Jack Napier who is really not much shorter will slam balls deep doggystyle for 5 minutes straight, and the girls rarely have a problem with that. That is why I like Jack scenes better than Mandingo scenes. But there are some scenes where the girl ends up taking Mandingo balls deep and those are great, but there are many frustrating scenes though.
 

b.c.

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 7, 2005
Posts
20,540
Media
0
Likes
21,779
Points
468
Location
at home
Verification
View
Gender
Male
Porn (like sex) is a matter of taste.

Maybe some here feel Mandingo is crap because they don't get out of his scenes what they're looking to find.

Maybe they're looking to find more passion on the faces of the women in the scenes, maybe more fear, maybe more pain. If the anticipated reaction isn't there perhaps they go away disappointed.

For that matter, "chemistry" (again, like sex) is dependent on two. So is it fair to say he is crap, (or perhaps maybe his co-stars are)?

In the personality department, for sure, he doesn't seem to display much. But then neither did Holmes (or a whole bunch of porn guys I can think of-with far less dick, to boot).

Did that make Holmes crap? Maybe, if you didn't get what you were looking for. :wink:
 

B_Kyuss

Experimental Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2006
Posts
181
Media
0
Likes
11
Points
163
I like his scenes, i'm a big fan.
To say "crap" is excessive, there are far worse actors.

I like his voice and i find him sexy, apart from the cock; it's true that he's not very imaginative, expecially when he directs (his latest movies are a bore), but he's done so many HOT scenes.

Yhere have been many beautiful girls capable to take it deep, rough, and still be comfortable with it, like Judy Star, Mone Devine, Christie Lee, Tiffany Minx, Missy Monroe...

Then again, on the occasion i can find more sexy his style, kinda timid, than
the rabbit fucking of some actors or the silly situations, they can't even act (like, any brazzers film) or the degradating shit of my fellow countryman Rocco.

Maybe his performances live up to the girl he's with, but i think that it depends on the fact that he respects the women. Plus, when he finds the good one, the scene is great.
 

Podeum

Just Browsing
Joined
Aug 8, 2007
Posts
2
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
221
Location
Los Angeles
Sexuality
60% Straight, 40% Gay
Gender
Male
There have been many times I imagined crawling between Mandingo's legs and worshipping his dick and balls with my mouth and tongue until he came down my throat--that's as far as my fantasy goes. I wouldn't let that thing anywhere near my ass, no way. So it's easy to imagine why Mandingo and a lot of the women he works with might not use the same style as someone like Julian (who I would let very, very near my ass, by the way) and his co-stars routinely demonstrate.

Hypocritically, I admit there are times I'm frustrated when I watch Mandingo's performances, because I do like "depth charging" too (good one stratedude) and Mandingo rarely goes balls-deep or anywhere close to it.
 

lgej

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2007
Posts
452
Media
0
Likes
17
Points
163
Location
CT
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I think the problem I have with mandingo is that he is almost never willing to try to go balls deep. I'm sure in reality the girl tells him before hand, "OK go really shallow at first, and when I tap on you, that means it is starting to hurt" or something to that effect, which ends up making the scene look like he is not even willing to try a depth charge (lol). I'd like to think I am being overly critical, but then I can't explain why a guy like Jack Napier who is really not much shorter will slam balls deep doggystyle for 5 minutes straight, and the girls rarely have a problem with that. That is why I like Jack scenes better than Mandingo scenes. But there are some scenes where the girl ends up taking Mandingo balls deep and those are great, but there are many frustrating scenes though.

It probably has something to do with the relative hardness of their cocks. Napier's appears somewhat "marshmallowy", while Mandingo is usually pretty hard. Never having taken in a cock, I couldn't be sure; but, it seems to make sense that the harder version would be more difficult from which to take a classical "pounding."
 

BenWaaaaah

Just Browsing
Joined
Nov 27, 2006
Posts
38
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
151
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
I personally would take Julian's or Lex's over Mandingo's. I know many girls who say size matters - if it's too big or too small. I think Julian and Lex are within an inch or two lengthwise. Mandingo - he's just a circus act. I think a woman would be equally impressed if you whipped out a Lex-size as they would and Mandingo-size. Either way, chances are you will be the biggest they have ever seen... With the Lex, you will get to use all of it. With the Mandingo, you may get to use half...