mandingo measurment pic
- Thread starter D_Maurice Mountlilly
- Start date
Yeah, never trust if you don't see the base. Some videos of Brandibelle, measuring some guys, are completely wrong... talking about 7 or 8 inches cock starting from the end of the balls!
Anyway, if the ruler is true and not deformed, I suppose that mandingo's cock starts from where the ruler is at 2 inches. So, 12(as seen at the end)-2=10 inches.. I suppose...
Anyway, if the ruler is true and not deformed, I suppose that mandingo's cock starts from where the ruler is at 2 inches. So, 12(as seen at the end)-2=10 inches.. I suppose...
B_ScaredLittleBoy
Experimental Member
The last measurement in the picture is the 4" mark. It looks like his cock stops (reaches the base) pretty soon after that (at say 3", being generous). Which leaves 2" or so. He's therefore at least 2" less than the top of the ruler's reading. Which is around 9" or 10"
Looks kinda fake though on the cover.
Looks kinda fake though on the cover.
Now, in the actual feature does Mandingo get measured? Because I know what's seen on the CD package is not always included.
Now, in the actual feature does Mandingo get measured? Because I know what's seen on the CD package is not always included.
nah..he doesn't...it just the typical 'dingo flick of him trying to go as deep as he can in a woman he's workin' with.
right you are.porn loves to label everyone as having 12/13 inchers.the truth be known,the last 13incher was john holmes.
...and he wasn't even that big.
You know, sometimes I wonder how some of us guys would be billed as if we were doing porn? Would I be billed as 10 or 11 inches, à la Preston Parker? Thanks to LPSG, we can clearly see how large an 8" cock really is (even though no porn actor is ever billed as having an 8" dick these days, it's probably considered too small by the industry's standards now
).very true.remember dick rambone??his 11incher suddenly became 15....and he wasn't even that big.
You know, sometimes I wonder how some of us guys would be billed as if we were doing porn? Would I be billed as 10 or 11 inches, à la Preston Parker? Thanks to LPSG, we can clearly see how large an 8" cock really is (even though no porn actor is ever billed as having an 8" dick these days, it's probably considered too small by the industry's standards now
...and he wasn't even that big.
You know, sometimes I wonder how some of us guys would be billed as if we were doing porn? Would I be billed as 10 or 11 inches, à la Preston Parker? Thanks to LPSG, we can clearly see how large an 8" cock really is (even though no porn actor is ever billed as having an 8" dick these days, it's probably considered too small by the industry's standards now
Wow Burns, you are really big -- and modest to tell the truth that you are 8", which is huge as we can see. If you did porn, you'd be 10" at least. So sorry you are so straight, you need a man to take care of that hard on for you.
D_Gunther Snotpole
Account Disabled
No doubt.
Well, you're fighting the wind, dalibor. Like half the board.
But burnsie, I fear, is about as straight as the CPR tracks across Saskatchewan.
He bears ill-will towards no man (at least in principle), but his march through life, willy nilly, is a parade of broken hearts and spavined spirits.
He can't help it.:redface:
Looking from the way they are both being measured and how the rulers are placed kinda funky, none of them are any bigger than 9" and that's being generous. I'd say 8.5-9 on both. Which is absolutely fucking huge. But this is the kind of thing that skews peoples opinions of what big really is. When I see people on here that claim to only be interested in men over 9 or 10 inches, it seems sort of ridiculous because that size is so rare.
speaking of huge members.does anyone know the true size of the late ,great scott taylor??supposedly,he had surpassed john holmes by several inches.
Similar threads
