ManlyBanisters and Italian banned ?

[seahorses]

Undeniable, seahorses. Undeniable.

So how long have you been cooking then?

 

[SteveHd]

Oh, you meant "Lavefer" , whoever that is.:tongue:

I had a dyslexic moment; apologies to Lafever.

He seem to improve shortly before the suspensions. I also saw him being prodded and provoked by other members. Do away with the provocations, he might be o.k.

As we know from AndyA et al, a ban doesn't necessarily get rid of someone.

 

[Mem]

I had a dyslexic momen; apologies to Lafever.

He seem to improve shortly before the suspensions. I also saw him being prodded and provoked by other members. Do away with the provocations, he might be o.k.

As we know from AndyA et al, a ban doesn't necessarily get rid of someone.

As far as HarTliss goes, very few would disagree that he should be banned. (I am writing his name in code because he searches his name in threads for attention.)

I feel sorry for Lafever, but I do think he needs to be banned. You shouldn't ban people because you dislike them, and shouldn't keep trolls because you like them.

 

[Bbucko]

As we know from AndyA et al, a ban doesn't necessarily get rid of someone.

Rest assured, the mods will be notified if and when AndyA/Italian978/1 decides to make a comeback.

 

[SteveHd]

As far as HarTliss goes, very few would disagree that he should be banned. ...

Well I guess I'm one of the "very few". :smile: He's bothersome but not quite over the line into trollhood. Anyway, would banning him keep him out? I have some doubt.

 

[Mem]

Well I guess I'm one of the "very few". :smile: He's bothersome but not quite over the line into trollhood. Anyway, would banning him keep him out? I have some doubt.

I think in the long run it would keep him out. Once he is banned, he will be continuously banned until he gets tired of this place.

Every good website needs a villain or two, so I guess they want to keep them.

 

[D_Gunther Snotpole]

So how long have you been cooking then?

Ever since you inspired me to wade through the comments of a quarter million subscribers.
You're very inspiring that way, seahorses.

 

[seahorses]

Ever since you inspired me to wade through the comments of a quarter million subscribers.
You're very inspiring that way, seahorses.

Always happy to be of service:wink:

 

[Drifterwood]

Rhubarb.

 

[D_Gunther Snotpole]

Rhubarb.

I am here for you always, Drifter ...

 

[simcha]

Bump

 

[D_Kaye Throttlebottom]

psst... I'm not Italian1 or whatever the latest gossip is..

I'm sure that's uncomfortable, because surely only 1 person in the would would think that we are born equally, but sadly we are not born to procreate homosexually. So what rights are we denied here? We are all born with the equipment we are born with, what we chose to do with it, is a different story. Saying that doesn't make one a hater or homophobe.

I guess that's not the case. At least it explains why Italian1 doesn't PM any more.

I pulled out of that thread, because I got PM's that this person is saying this about me and this person is calling me a C*** and then I got baited in to anti-gay agenda that I never substantiated and was asked by everyone to tell them when I decided ...

It's not debating that you, DC, were doing. You were being manipulative and baiting, it wasn't civilized. You were taking offense by suggesting I had positions that I never hinted at by introducing it by asking "I'm still waiting for that - who said ____" to give the impression that I said it, when I never did. Yet you introduced it as though I had and just like that everyone jumped on believing that is what happened.

I haven't been that upset in a long time and it was a web board, for crying out loud. You don't know me in real life and you did not know my uncle and you didn't watch him die for a long time. Yes, he made choices. That was his life. You see it differently and I can agree that is your opinion without having to whiplish you allover a web-board for disagreeing with me.

I don't think gays are bad evil people. I think we have choices, hetero and homo alike. I still support gay-marriage, etc. I just arrived at that conclusion differently and don't think choice a four letter word. I'm done talking about it though and I'm done reading how I was the one that was attacking DC. It didn't go that way. All I did was disagree and he came unglued and called me a C*** and insisted I was wrong. Fine in your opinion I'm wrong, yet I was being called a homophobe for simply having a difference of opinion. You decided I had that view about EVERYONE and would not relent and it was not healthy. yet I never called you a homophobic slur, dismissed you, because it wasn't productive and you weren't looking for a civilized debate - you were looking for something to cry foul at... you were trying to win by bashing me...or worse frame me as a homophobe and it worked. You had people telling me to die, for crying outloud.

that is why I pulled out.

So I wasn't banned and no I'm not Italian1.

you do the math.

 

[D_Tintagel_Demondong]

I'm sure that's uncomfortable, because surely only 1 person in the would would think that we are born equally, but sadly we are not born to procreate homosexually and saying that doesn't make one a hater or homophobe.

What the fuck does that have to do with anything posted here? You why don't you keep your agenda in the Gay threads, you obsessive freak.

 

[dong20]

Bump

Why?

 

[No_Strings]

Fine in your opinion I'm wrong, yet I was being called a homophobe for it.

You were most likely being called a homophobe because you're a homophobe.

 

[D_Kaye Throttlebottom]

You were most likely being called a homophobe because you're a homophobe.

see this is the kind of baiting I'm talking about, I'm not latching on or defending myself against it any more. I have a different point of view about how we get to the same conclusion, I support gay marriage and don't think they are bad, evil people. For that I'm a homophobe and need to jump w/out a chute? Go figure.

oh... you forgot to add..

I'm most likely being called Italian1, because I'm Italian1.

Using that logic, I just have to be accused to make it true.

Yeah done with this.

 

[jason_els]

Zoe is about the most uneducated person I've seen on this forum. She's not Itlaian/Andy. Italian/Andy has an MO that Zoe can't begin to reach.

You're so ready to hoist yourself onto a cross the minute anybody challenges you with an argument from which you're incapable of defending yourself. You've got a set of beliefs and now for what I count as the fourth time (and I could be wrong), you've excused yourself from proceedings only to continue to announce that you've excused yourself from proceedings! Lord in heaven above, what is it? Either stay or leave but don't continue to protest your innocence.

My grandmother was just like you. Negative attention reigned supreme. If you can get love or attention by being unjustly treated then continue to announce to the world how unfairly you've been treated and immediately retreat to martyrdom the minute anyone challenges you. It's absurd and an insult to the intelligence of many of the posters here.

Get off your fucking cross and argue your point with intelligence and acumen (look it up) or leave entirely to pollute only your immediate physical area.

Gay men and women do not need your apologetics nor do they want them.

 

[faceking]

Zoe is about the most uneducated person I've seen on this forum. She's not Itlaian/Andy. Italian/Andy has an MO that Zoe can't begin to reach.

You're so ready to hoist yourself onto a cross the minute anybody challenges you with an argument from which you're incapable of defending yourself. You've got a set of beliefs and now for what I count as the fourth time (and I could be wrong), you've excused yourself from proceedings only to continue to announce that you've excused yourself from proceedings! Lord in heaven above, what is it? Either stay or leave but don't continue to protest your innocence.

My grandmother was just like you. Negative attention reigned supreme. If you can get love or attention by being unjustly treated then continue to announce to the world how unfairly you've been treated and immediately retreat to martyrdom the minute anyone challenges you. It's absurd and an insult to the intelligence of many of the posters here.

Get off your fucking cross and argue your point with intelligence and acumen (look it up) or leave entirely to pollute only your immediate physical area.

Gay men and women do not need your apologetics nor do they want them.

Ahhhhhhhhhhh... good to see I haven't miss much in this thread, anger, beration, etc....... and why the F would you "bump" this thread back...

 

[faceking]

It's not debating that you, DC, were doing. You were being manipulative and baiting, it wasn't civilized.

There's a first... DC getting personal and baiting...

All I did was disagree and he came unglued and called me a C*** and insisted I was wrong.

Mods???? Bueller?

Fine in your opinion I'm wrong, yet I was being called a homophobe for simply having a difference of opinion. You decided I had that view about EVERYONE and would not relent and it was not healthy. yet I never called you a homophobic slur, dismissed you, because it wasn't productive and you weren't looking for a civilized debate - you were looking for something to cry foul at... you were trying to win by bashing me...or worse frame me as a homophobe and it worked.

Another shocker... par for the course.

 

[jason_els]

Ahhhhhhhhhhh... good to see I haven't miss much in this thread, anger, beration, etc....... and why the F would you "bump" this thread back...

I've had three martinis?