Mark jansen big brother U.S. 19

lh0711

Superior Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2017
Posts
2,452
Media
0
Likes
6,861
Points
208
Location
Blackpool (England)
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Female
Look, I get it. If we want to see the goods we should pay and not leak his stuff etc. However, $30 for some thirst trap pics of things that can easily be posted on Instagram with no issue for free? That’s a bit much. Especially for a brand new page. I’ve actually subscribed to a few people’s pages BECAUSE some of the content was posted here. I use this as like a preview so I can see what I’m buying into first, before giving someone my hard earned money. We have zero idea of the kind of content these guys post because it’s all private until we pay to subscribe. So if he wants us to pay him $30 (which actually ends up being more due to exchange rates), then he needs to give us at least some kind of preview. I have no issues paying to see his hot bod, but I do have an issue paying $30+ a month for PG-13 versions of pics from his Instagram. He can’t get upset about that.
And just to add to that... He isn't refusing to post nudes because of "People on here"... That's just an excuse so gullible fools will direct their anger at people in this forum rather than complain to him that he's wasting your money.
 

MADDEY80

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2019
Posts
16
Media
0
Likes
130
Points
38
Location
Miami (Florida, United States)
Sexuality
No Response
So i went a head and subscribed to his page, even though the $30 is a bit much. So far, not impressed. No frontal nudity, but to be fair, he did state there would be no dick pics, so at least he was up front. He posts some-what frequently,, so far mainly just pics. I think like 3 videos so far, mainly of him just talking. The lamest thing is he added screen caps from Big Brother to his oics section, ones we've all seen. So far since i joined (yesterday) he posted 2 locked messages. 1 pic for $12 (he stated in the description "no dic", so again i give him credit for being up front) and he posted a $14 22 second video (can't imagine it's worth it).
 

Jay1989

Sexy Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Posts
30
Media
0
Likes
56
Points
53
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
So i went a head and subscribed to his page, even though the $30 is a bit much. So far, not impressed. No frontal nudity, but to be fair, he did state there would be no dick pics, so at least he was up front. He posts some-what frequently,, so far mainly just pics. I think like 3 videos so far, mainly of him just talking. The lamest thing is he added screen caps from Big Brother to his oics section, ones we've all seen. So far since i joined (yesterday) he posted 2 locked messages. 1 pic for $12 (he stated in the description "no dic", so again i give him credit for being up front) and he posted a $14 22 second video (can't imagine it's worth it).

Thanks for the heads up, really appreciate it :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: thejoejoe

canadian_guy486

Worshipped Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2011
Posts
1,051
Media
0
Likes
14,481
Points
443
Location
Canada
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
So i went a head and subscribed to his page, even though the $30 is a bit much. So far, not impressed. No frontal nudity, but to be fair, he did state there would be no dick pics, so at least he was up front. He posts some-what frequently,, so far mainly just pics. I think like 3 videos so far, mainly of him just talking. The lamest thing is he added screen caps from Big Brother to his oics section, ones we've all seen. So far since i joined (yesterday) he posted 2 locked messages. 1 pic for $12 (he stated in the description "no dic", so again i give him credit for being up front) and he posted a $14 22 second video (can't imagine it's worth it).
He’s charging $30 just to subscribe, and another $12-$14 for “exclusive” content??? Wow. People, please do not give him money for this. You’re literally just paying his rent for him. There are high profile porn stars that charge less for their content than him. Mark if you’re reading this, stop trying to scam people out of their hard earned money. We are in the middle of a pandemic.
 
4

4706161

Guest
To be fair, Mark posts a description of what's in every DM content he sends, so people can know what they're paying for. I know it's overpriced, but he's being very fair and doing as much as he's comfortable now, unlike people like Hunter who are actively scamming his subscribers
 
  • Like
Reactions: focus0t

bangle1

Mythical Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2008
Posts
1,845
Media
0
Likes
25,378
Points
543
Location
London
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
7 pages and no pics other than the fifth comment made.

TF is up with you guys and talking. Post pics we can jerk off to and shut the fuck up.

This thread was full of pics until he served a DMCA and had them all removed, including screen caps from Big Brother which he is now posting to his OF as his own material. Almost laughable.
 

xanthis2001

Legendary Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Posts
421
Media
0
Likes
2,018
Points
213
Location
Florida (United States)
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
This thread was full of pics until he served a DMCA and had them all removed, including screen caps from Big Brother which he is now posting to his OF as his own material. Almost laughable.

That's why 90% of DMCA notices shouldn't be taken seriously. If it is literally the IP of the sender then, of course, honor them but otherwise respond with a statement of fair use when no profit is being made. How exactly are they going to sue for screencaps that are literally all over the internet especially when they didn't own the rights to them in the first place? Most of the time it's just a scare tactic and it isn't even coming from an actual legal professional but is just a form letter template.
 

Zanefan

Legendary Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Nov 30, 2019
Posts
351
Media
0
Likes
1,627
Points
438
Location
Pennsylvania (United States)
Gender
Male
That's why 90% of DMCA notices shouldn't be taken seriously. If it is literally the IP of the sender then, of course, honor them but otherwise respond with a statement of fair use when no profit is being made. How exactly are they going to sue for screencaps that are literally all over the internet especially when they didn't own the rights to them in the first place? Most of the time it's just a scare tactic and it isn't even coming from an actual legal professional but is just a form letter template.

I don't think you are wrong, but it's not in the best interest of a site like LPSG to get into a pissing match. It's not worth the time or energy. Best to comply and move on.
 

xanthis2001

Legendary Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Posts
421
Media
0
Likes
2,018
Points
213
Location
Florida (United States)
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
I don't think you are wrong, but it's not in the best interest of a site like LPSG to get into a pissing match. It's not worth the time or energy. Best to comply and move on.

That's exactly what they are counting on. It's like a Karen threatening the manager because they are gambling that the manager would rather just let them have their way and get rid of them.

Keep in mind I'm not talking about people who have valid complaints or whose actual IP has been stolen. I'm talking about people whose pictures are literally all over the internet but they don't like the idea of their name being connected to a "gay" site when they google their name so they send these letters that have no real legal threat to them.