- Joined
- Aug 18, 2005
- Posts
- 1,750
- Media
- 27
- Likes
- 179
- Points
- 283
- Location
- Dallas/Ft. Worth, Texas
- Sexuality
- No Response
Okay Folks -
So what do you all think about how men are perceived who are:
A.) Married
B.) Married then Divorced
C.) Not married before 40
From my background (Upstate New York, very WASPY, conservative republican, et. al.) clearly being a man and married in 20s providing well for hot wife and beautiful children (thanks fam.!) is the standard.
Married 'on time' but divorced ahh - sad, too bad but kind of frowned upon, probably the woman's fault (just relating lifelong observations here).
Not married before 40 = something REALLY wrong with the guy = can't financially provide or dates whores, or wouldn't settle for a miserable marriage with genetically appropriate girl from similar background (and criticized for it since EVERYONE had to do it) or well, that's it.
So which of these is the most badly perceived idea of men who fall into one of the above categories?
So what do you all think about how men are perceived who are:
A.) Married
B.) Married then Divorced
C.) Not married before 40
From my background (Upstate New York, very WASPY, conservative republican, et. al.) clearly being a man and married in 20s providing well for hot wife and beautiful children (thanks fam.!) is the standard.
Married 'on time' but divorced ahh - sad, too bad but kind of frowned upon, probably the woman's fault (just relating lifelong observations here).
Not married before 40 = something REALLY wrong with the guy = can't financially provide or dates whores, or wouldn't settle for a miserable marriage with genetically appropriate girl from similar background (and criticized for it since EVERYONE had to do it) or well, that's it.
So which of these is the most badly perceived idea of men who fall into one of the above categories?