Matthew camp makes a onesie sexy

[Rican84]

im a bottom and i don’t like to seeing a top take dick, like if you’re a top why do you want to bottoming? i don’t get it, i know that’s vers people but when you calling yourself a top you don’t bottom, and shame people for the preference isn’t cool, bottom don’t need a vers because they never will be top his partner, is not heteronormativity it’s preference

Lmao

 

[ClarkReid17]

im a bottom and i don’t like to seeing a top take dick, like if you’re a top why do you want to bottoming? i don’t get it, i know that’s vers people but when you calling yourself a top you don’t bottom, and shame people for the preference isn’t cool, bottom don’t need a vers because they never will be top his partner, is not heteronormativity it’s preference

Yes. 100% correct! But the FASCISTS in the LGBT movement do NOT want DIVERSITY. The wannabe Hitlers want you all to be VERSE. No ifs, no buts. You have to toe the line. Or else...

IRONIC, right? Actually, it's HYPOCRITICAL. LOL

 

[ClarkReid17]

Lmao

This is how a FASCIST laugh. LOL

 

[GodsAndMen]

Matt models his birthday suit.

 

[Rican84]

This is how a FASCIST laugh. LOL

I laughed because I just think what happens when you meet a top and get into a relationship and start loving them and then all of a sudden the top wants to try bottoming. What do you do? Lol, break up with them?

Don't couple me with other ppl or assume shit about me. Idc what you want or like. If you're 100% bottom, cool. 100% top cool. But not everyone is like that. Youre the one that thinks ppl should conform to your way of thinking.

 

[Vertigo1814]

I’m a top that has bottomed a few times. Even had relationships where I was majority bottom. Sometimes the exception proves the rule. And the best tops occasionally flip because that’s how you learn what feels good. But does “top” best describe the majority of my sexual encounters? Yes. Do I identify as a top? Yes.

I get the sense that this forum has this obsession with “catching out” tops by posting the evidence of the couple of times they have bottomed over and over again as if it’s somehow a massive “gotcha”. And then turning a blind eye to all the more frequent times they top as though the couple of times they bottomed overrules that.

Dunno. Just my vibe. If Matt was genuinely more of a bottom or genuinely vers - there woukd be plenty of money to be made in that - if not more. Why would he “pretend” to be a top? What would there be to gain? Even if he’s 70:30 Top:Bottom - he still has every right to identity and market himself as a majority top.

 

[Rican84]

I’m a top that has bottomed a few times. Even had relationships where I was majority bottom. Sometimes the exception proves the rule. And the best tops occasionally flip because that’s how you learn what feels good. But does “top” best describe the majority of my sexual encounters? Yes. Do I identify as a top? Yes.

I get the sense that this forum has this obsession with “catching out” tops by posting the evidence of the couple of times they have bottomed over and over again as if it’s somehow a massive “gotcha”. And then turning a blind eye to all the more frequent times they top as though the couple of times they bottomed overrules that.

Dunno. Just my vibe. If Matt was genuinely more of a bottom or genuinely vers - there woukd be plenty of money to be made in that - if not more. Why would he “pretend” to be a top? What would there be to gain? Even if he’s 70:30 Top:Bottom - he still has every right to identity and market himself as a majority top.

Bro, they're gonna attack you now. They're too limited by their views and think everyone has to conform to labels.

 

[Vertigo1814]

And another thing. It’s ok for bottoms to “perform” in role play and verbal kink with stuff like fem moaning and “fuck me daddy, use my hole” etc (no judgement, it’s hot as hell) and no one calls them a fake or a liar.

But if part of a top’s personal kink is doing the mirror of that - and presenting themselves as dominant or hyper-masculine - they are somehow a fake?? Because they bottomed that time?

Smells like hypocrisy to me. No one is hunting down the videos of the time the twinky bottom toppee to “prove” his entire sexual identity is somehow a bag of lies

 

[Vinicius1345]

i don’t calling anyone fake, it’s just i don’t get why you call yourself a top if you like to bottoming? better call yourself a versatile, but what a saying for me and most of 100% bottoms don’t look up for a vers guy for relationships because we can’t and don’t want to fuck them, so i prefere a guy 100% top, he can be fem or masc idc, just be a top
and yeah if i’m on grindr and someone call for a fuck, idc if he’s gonna be vers or a top, but in a relationship i only date top who don’t have this “thing” to experiment bottoming

 

[Vertigo1814]

So where would this magical cut off point be? If someone had bottomed once in their life; they wouldn’t be allowed to call themselves a top? Twice? Once a year? What is it?

Which brings us back to Matt. Because for someone who works in the sex industry and has hundreds of filmed sexual encounters - the number of times he’s bottomed on camera is literally 5. So let’s say that’s 5% of the times he’s had sex in porn. Is it not reasonable someone that is top 95% of the time identity as a top?

 

[Jess13]

Some people need to get out of their own headspace more often. Have fun trying something new/different. Stop being a prisoner of your own mind.

 

[Vinicius1345]

i think some people have to understand that be vers is not for everyone and let people do what give them pleasure

we cannot say that matt is a exemple because if you know diego sans who started to only top on men.com and in his of but when he comes to brazil off camera he’s bottoming for everyone, porn actors still actors and can play any role they are paid to play, so who’s gonna tell me that off cameras matt still a top?

 

[ClarkReid17]

I’m a top that has bottomed a few times. Even had relationships where I was majority bottom. Sometimes the exception proves the rule. And the best tops occasionally flip because that’s how you learn what feels good. But does “top” best describe the majority of my sexual encounters? Yes. Do I identify as a top? Yes.

I get the sense that this forum has this obsession with “catching out” tops by posting the evidence of the couple of times they have bottomed over and over again as if it’s somehow a massive “gotcha”. And then turning a blind eye to all the more frequent times they top as though the couple of times they bottomed overrules that.

Dunno. Just my vibe. If Matt was genuinely more of a bottom or genuinely vers - there woukd be plenty of money to be made in that - if not more. Why would he “pretend” to be a top? What would there be to gain? Even if he’s 70:30 Top:Bottom - he still has every right to identity and market himself as a majority top.

There goes the FASCIST PROPAGANDA. LOL.

Honey, the point of the matter is, there are gays who does not want their tops to be verse. End of discussion.

Whatever float their boats, right? LOL

 

[ClarkReid17]

So where would this magical cut off point be? If someone had bottomed once in their life; they wouldn’t be allowed to call themselves a top? Twice? Once a year? What is it?

Which brings us back to Matt. Because for someone who works in the sex industry and has hundreds of filmed sexual encounters - the number of times he’s bottomed on camera is literally 5. So let’s say that’s 5% of the times he’s had sex in porn. Is it not reasonable someone that is top 95% of the time identity as a top?

Oh because the prevailing MEDIA PROPAGANDA is VERSE, every gay must be VERSE? Whatta LOGIC. LOL

 

[ClarkReid17]

I laughed because I just think what happens when you meet a top and get into a relationship and start loving them and then all of a sudden the top wants to try bottoming. What do you do? Lol, break up with them?

Don't couple me with other ppl or assume shit about me. Idc what you want or like. If you're 100% bottom, cool. 100% top cool. But not everyone is like that. Youre the one that thinks ppl should conform to your way of thinking.

If he bottoms, he can't call himself top. LOGIC. Duh! LOL

In the same way that far more gays are "pure" bottoms. Whatever float their boats, right?

HYPOCRISY! LOL

 

[ClarkReid17]

Some people need to get out of their own headspace more often. Have fun trying something new/different. Stop being a prisoner of your own mind.

How about understanding the FACT that there are so called "pure" bottoms? Are you going to shame them for their sexual pleasures?

Whatever float their boats, right? LOL

 

[Tagood7]

Has his page gotten any better?

 

[Aaboink69]

im a bottom and i don’t like to seeing a top take dick, like if you’re a top why do you want to bottoming? i don’t get it, i know that’s vers people but when you calling yourself a top you don’t bottom, and shame people for the preference isn’t cool, bottom don’t need a vers because they never will be top his partner, is not heteronormativity it’s preference

there are no rules to having sex, labels are preferences doesn’t mean you have to stick to them.

 

[Rican84]

If he bottoms, he can't call himself top. LOGIC. Duh! LOL

In the same way that far more gays are "pure" bottoms. Whatever float their boats, right?

HYPOCRISY! LOL

Lol. You replied a whole day later. You're one of those members who just comes on here to argue.

You didn't even understand what the other dude was saying. Lol.

I'm not with the back and forth. Keep arguing.

 

[Vertigo1814]

You can find attractive whatever you like. If you’d reject a top for having bottomed once or twice, then I’d say that’s a bit extreme, but the only person you’re sabotaging is yourself.

My point is that if someone identifies sexually as a top, it’s not your place to question it or pour over their sexual history - with very scant evidence - to try and refute it. Or say they are lying about it to make money.