MATTHEW MCCONAUGHEY'S SHORT PENIS (in a full frontal nude scene)

[Raitata]

I'm just hitting ignore on them and walking away from the ego fragility. The thread has become long winded enough as it is.

Oh God please don't take it personally.... aren't we just dicussing and having different opinions?
Honestly, I am chill about it. Just not convinced by what you said. I don't believe this is being egotistic. There is no point on being egotistic talking about dicks, lmao, please. I did not know you were upset. Sorry!

 

[Yutbower]

Oh God please don't take it personally.... aren't we just dicussing and having different opinions?
Honestly, I am chill about it. Just not convinced by what you said. I don't believe this is being egotistic. There is no point on being egotistic talking about dicks, lmao, please. I did not know you were upset. Sorry!

While the other thread is bad enough, I have no problem responding do this here, and I'm not letting the ignore button imply I'M the one getting upset over this.

Not even upset, just annoyed, and I'm not the only one. And I'M certainly not the one taking it personally which is already obvious enough

And you've been anything but chill about this. I mean look at your reaction to Nfman11 which is a typical, if not cliche reaction of a covert narcissist being butthurt. All they asked for was for the mods to be involved....

It's really not a big deal that you made a mistake about what's actually visible, and you really need to get it through your head there's no actual concrete evidence in the pics you keep posting, it's speculative at best.

 

[aninnymouse]

And here, two different screenshots where his short cute dick is evident. I am so happy with this find, he is my celeb crush since forever ☺

I've seen clearer pictures of the Loch Ness Monster.

 

[Raitata]

Sorry... i have no problem discussing this topic, but when people say it is not an original topic and want to ban me for it, I don't need to put up with it, if they did not even read it all to begin with.
But anyone who wants to disagree with me about the topic itself, just like you do is more than welcomed.
As I argumented in the other thread, he is not wearing a G string in the scene I mentioned. The picture you sent there was from another scene, mostly shot in the dark.
It is evident he is naked in the scene I am talking about, also this explanation makes all sense by 6 main arguments: 1- he is alone in this scene, unlike the one he is wearing the G string; 2 - he is shooting in a very light environment, this is why he is clearly naked as we can see his butt and pelvis, and no g string line around, unline the shoot you sent where it was mostly in the dark. 3 - in his frontal nude scene, he was pretty much distant and it lasted for two seconds. 4 - during the frontal nude part, the image's quality is not as good as in the rest of the scene, which is probably because they recorded with a different camera, not as good as the one for the other scenes. This means he was probably unaware they were recording the part where he stood up, but it aired anyway. 5 - this movie is from 2008, internet was not a thing as it is nowadays, and the worries about such scenes were not the same. 6 - please look at the following attachment. Although it is not high quality, what does it look like? A g string or his genitals? Please, be honest. lol. It is pretty clear to me... also, there are more screenshots of this scene where his dick is visible, and it the video it quickly bounces. The pictures are avaiable in this thread, and his penis does stick out from the balls at moments, they are not tied together.
One more thing about special effects. It is much more practical to be naked for few seconds like he did in that short frame than editing it all perfectly. Which by the image's quality, I doubt they could do it at the time. Plus, if they allegedly edited the g string lines, why did they leave his penis exposed in this frame? It is not a blur, it is just a low definition image, we can see the shape of it all indeed.

 

[Raitata]

I've seen clearer pictures of the Loch Ness Monster.

Lol, unfortunately that is probably the only original frontal nude from Mcconaughey we'll ever see.

 

[Mits1092]

Sorry... i have no problem discussing this topic, but when people say it is not an original topic and want to ban me for it, I don't need to put up with it, if they did not even read it all to begin with.
But anyone who wants to disagree with me about the topic itself, just like you do is more than welcomed.
As I argumented in the other thread, he is not wearing a G string in the scene I mentioned. The picture you sent there was from another scene, mostly shot in the dark.
It is evident he is naked in the scene I am talking about, also this explanation makes all sense by 6 main arguments: 1- he is alone in this scene, unlike the one he is wearing the G string; 2 - he is shooting in a very light environment, this is why he is clearly naked as we can see his butt and pelvis, and no g string line around, unline the shoot you sent where it was mostly in the dark. 3 - in his frontal nude scene, he was pretty much distant and it lasted for two seconds. 4 - during the frontal nude part, the image's quality is not as good as in the rest of the scene, which is probably because they recorded with a different camera, not as good as the one for the other scenes. This means he was probably unaware they were recording the part where he stood up, but it aired anyway. 5 - this movie is from 2008, internet was not a thing as it is nowadays, and the worries about such scenes were not the same. 6 - please look at the following attachment. Although it is not high quality, what does it look like? A g string or his genitals? Please, be honest. lol. It is pretty clear to me... also, there are more screenshots of this scene where his dick is visible, and it the video it quickly bounces. The pictures are avaiable in this thread, and his penis does stick out from the balls at moments, they are not tied together.
One more thing about special effects. It is much more practical to be naked for few seconds like he did in that short frame than editing it all perfectly. Which by the image's quality, I doubt they could do it at the time. Plus, if they allegedly edited the g string lines, why did they leave his penis exposed in this frame? It is not a blur, it is just a low definition image, we can see the shape of it all indeed.

Why would anyone put this much effort into something so stupid? And why are people so thirsty to see a celebrity dick that this *image* which looks like it was from the dark side of the moon does something for them? You do know you could just go look at a real dick on a porn site instead of this psychological ink blot that someone says is a dick, maybe you'd get off for once and get on with life.

TLDR(something your post needed, if it had to even exist): Get your rocks off, then go get a life that doesn't involve online stalking of celebrities. ✌

 

[aninnymouse]

Why would anyone put this much effort into something so stupid? And why are people so thirsty to see a celebrity dick that this *image* which looks like it was from the dark side of the moon does something for them? You do know you could just go look at a real dick on a porn site instead of this psychological ink blot that someone says is a dick, maybe you'd get off for once and get on with life.

TLDR(something your post needed, if it had to even exist): Get your rocks off, then go get a life that doesn't involve online stalking of celebrities. ✌

This.

 

[Raitata]

Why would anyone put this much effort into something so stupid? And why are people so thirsty to see a celebrity dick that this *image* which looks like it was from the dark side of the moon does something for them? You do know you could just go look at a real dick on a porn site instead of this psychological ink blot that someone says is a dick, maybe you'd get off for once and get on with life.

TLDR(something your post needed, if it had to even exist): Get your rocks off, then go get a life that doesn't involve online stalking of celebrities. ✌

Then why are you wasting your time and energy in my thread if you have such a fabulous life, why do you even bother? And excuse me, I have a celeb crush on him. I also thought people here would respect other's sexual preferences, i don't really enjoy porn.
And your talk trying to shame on me is total bs. I don't owe you anything, and this thread is for people who are interested on the topic. So, please go mind your fantastic life somewhere else.
But seriously, do not throw your personal frustrations on me, not my fault sis. i am doing pretty good, and enjoying doing this thread.

 

[Yutbower]

Why would anyone put this much effort into something so stupid? And why are people so thirsty to see a celebrity dick that this *image* which looks like it was from the dark side of the moon does something for them? You do know you could just go look at a real dick on a porn site instead of this psychological ink blot that someone says is a dick, maybe you'd get off for once and get on with life.

TLDR(something your post needed, if it had to even exist): Get your rocks off, then go get a life that doesn't involve online stalking of celebrities. ✌

Exactly! And I don't know why they're now trying to say the g-string is from a different scene when you can watch the clip right on A-Z men and it's proves that it's the same scene. They don't even know what they're talking about...

 

[Raitata]

Exactly! And I don't know why they're now trying to say the g-string is from a different scene when you can watch the clip right on A-Z men and it's proves that it's the same scene.

It is not. It is cut. They cut the scene. This is why when you enhance both scenes (the light and the darker one) you only notice the string on the darker one. But in the movie is placed as one shoot, which is not.

 

[Raitata]

Come on now. I know the quality is bad, i did my best to enhance it. But it is clear it is a penis. Not a G string. A G string would be flat, with one regular color, and no different shapes. Plus it would have some definition.

 

[dinvy]

@Raitata sis is a mess

 

[Raitata]

@Raitata sis is a mess

I am a mess. But my arguments do make sense . Plus... i can't be the only one who can recognize a dick in this forum

 

[Yutbower]

I'm just making it easy for everyone and sharing the actual scene where you can see the g-string last second. You only need moderate knowledge of movie making to know that yes, clearly he doesn't have it on because no one else is in the shot. Yes its not visible when he first gets up, but A. it's not like they WANT it to be visible, and B. it makes no sense for him to have it covered when he's on screen with her in one shot and not have it on in the other. You either have it on the whole scene someone else is on screen with you, or you don't have it on at all.

SURFER, DUDE NUDE SCENES - AZNude Men

 

[Raitata]

I'm just making it easy for everyone and sharing the actual scene where you can see the g-string last second. You only need moderate knowledge of movie making to know that yes, clearly he doesn't have it on because no one else is in the shot. Yes its not visible when he first gets up, but A. it's not like they WANT it to be visible, and B. it makes no sense for him to have it covered when he's on screen with her in one shot and not have it on in the other. You either have it on the whole scene someone else is on screen with you, or you don't have it on at all.

SURFER, DUDE NUDE SCENES - AZNude Men

But i got it from the Aznude men website too. My point is: there is no editing on the g string on the dark scene, so they did not use edition in these scenes. He was nude indeed. And what you said about him beiny either naked all the time or covered all the time is not a rule. Actually, they saved time and money. He was comfortable to do a nude shot by himself, and therefore no edition needed, then when he came closer to the girl he used a g string. It makes sense cause they did not want g string lines being noticed. And the last shot where we can see it proves the point it is not edited out. Plus, what kind of edition would not blur the main area: the crotch?
This and the fact the close up picture looks like a nude cock, not a G string. Also did you check the video I made? The dick sticks out from the balls, they are not tied together. You also said you saw the pubes, but can you REALLY see the penis and balls' shape? Cause i totally do.

 

[Raitata]

Again, a different screenshot where his dick is sticking out from the balls. And its penis head is evident.

I'm just making it easy for everyone and sharing the actual scene where you can see the g-string last second. You only need moderate knowledge of movie making to know that yes, clearly he doesn't have it on because no one else is in the shot. Yes its not visible when he first gets up, but A. it's not like they WANT it to be visible, and B. it makes no sense for him to have it covered when he's on screen with her in one shot and not have it on in the other. You either have it on the whole scene someone else is on screen with you, or you don't have it on at all.

SURFER, DUDE NUDE SCENES - AZNude Men

 

[Yutbower]

But i got it from the Aznude men website too. My point is: there is no editing on the g string on the dark scene, so they did not use edition in these scenes. He was nude indeed. And what you said about him beiny either naked all the time or covered all the time is not a rule. Actually, they saved time and money. He was comfortable to do a nude shot by himself, and therefore no edition needed, then when he came closer to the girl he used a g string. It makes sense cause they did not want g string lines being noticed. And the last shot where we can see it proves the point it is not edited out. Plus, what kind of edition would not blur the main area: the crotch?
This and the fact the close up picture looks like a nude cock, not a G string. Also did you check the video I made? The dick sticks out from the balls, they are not tied together. You also said you saw the pubes, but can you REALLY see the penis and balls' shape? Cause i totally do.

Unless you got an interview or an conforming what you just said is true, please be done with treating assumptions like they're facts. And what does seeing pubes have to do with any of it? They're are various cock socks and modesty ouches out there.

 

[Raitata]

Again, a different screenshot where his dick is sticking out from the balls. And its penis head is evident.

I forgot to mention he is uncut! <3

 

[Raitata]

Unless you got an interview or an conforming what you just said is true, please be done with treating assumptions like they're facts. And what does seeing pubes have to do with any of it? They're are various cock socks and modesty ouches out there.

Why would I need to interview them? Shouldn´t it be the other way around? I mean, my argument makes more sense, don´t you think? Cause If you could see the G string in the scene, it is probably not edited at all, specially with this image quality, and also, how do you explain all the crotch details if he is covered?
And finally, why do they cut the scene right after he stands up? He didn´t do anything complex in that scene to excuse a scene cut from that. Wouldn´t it be easier just to stand up and do the scene nonstop? The only difference that I noticed was the modesty string that suddenly appeared after the first scene is cut.
But even if I didn´t have any evidence... the images in this topic are confirming what I said. They are the evidence itself...

 

[Raitata]

I'll look up the best quality version of this movie, just so you have a better view of it. But no doubt this is his dick. Also, it is short, uncut and totally suckable. ❤