D
deleted19896351
Guest
I had a relationship with a nice, handsome guy for years he had a small dick. I have never been with a big guy - I want to but its a bit daunting.
Again, multiple strategies involved. Even if the big hung one is shooting blanks, that doesn't preclude her getting impregnated by another party then having the status and resources of the big hung one to increase the survivability of offspring sired by more fertile men.Interesting. What if size for so many women is too big and they'd rather only slightly larger so that they can take more thus increasing probability of successful pregnancy? If that big/hung/huge dick is shooting blanks, she just backed herself and the species into an evolutionary corner.
Could you expand on that point a little bit more?Again, multiple strategies involved. Even if the big hung one is shooting blanks, that doesn't preclude her getting impregnated by another party then having the status and resources of the big hung one to increase the survivability of offspring sired by more fertile men.
Polyandry doesn't mesh so well with human society, hence why infidelity(cuckoldry) is the most reliable escape route for women when comes to an evolutionary corner they may find themselves backed into.
Truth be told, the very title of this thread could be changed to, "Maybe Having a (Insert Here) Doesn't Help??", because quite frankly no matter what metric(s) of attractiveness you adhere to as a man, there's some negative aspect of which, women will be motivated to covertly seek out solutions for in other men. For instance our conventional modern concept of romance was developed by men without jobs, status, or property seeking mating opportunities back when such things meant only 1 man reproduced for every 17 women.
Land and business ownership typically consumed a man's day if he were one of the few to have them. It could afford a relatively luxurious and safe life for(a) wome(a)n, but not afford them quality time. Most of what we consider as romantic involves a lot of time and effort, but not necessarily cost, a great way to get mating opportunities if you didn't have the money, power, or status to get it.Romance developed by Men without jobs?
Sort of like how 1-200 people in Asia have Genghis Khans DNA or something like that...Kings Mistress has been the norm for most of human civilization, the idea of the peasants wife is relatively new and very newly ubiquitous.One out of 17?
20% of men fuck 80% of the women. so thats just nothing new. Women in general dont marry the guy they're most attracted to, they marry for security, survival. Pareto Principle. And in modern times, a guy could be a total weakling, but make money kiss her ass etc lol so she will go with him. Where as in primitive times that guy would be eatenCould you expand on that point a little bit more?
Romance developed by Men without jobs?
One out of 17?
If you were to round up say a thousand or so of sexually active women between 18-35 and polled them upon the traits of their toxic exes, baby daddies, old hook ups, and the like; essentially men they had been most promiscuous with in the past but would never go back to them, do you think theyd describe them more as good looking guys with average dicks, or ugly guys with huge cocks?but a good looking guy with an "average" dick will always do better than an ugly guy with a huge cock.
A big dick doesn't hold the door, pick up the bill, ask how you feel, do the dishes, give you a hug when you really need it, entertain your friends, tell a joke or discuss a dilemma. It's still just a dick, remember?![]()
I agree within the realm of committed relationships and the like...In my experience, dick size is rarely that relevant in the straight world, its a niche fetish for some ladies, but for the most part being well hung is not a requirement and very low on the list of things women look for in men.