Me and my girlfriends theory on size...

[morethan]

Originally posted by the_force+Mar 1 2005, 09:15 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(the_force &#064; Mar 1 2005, 09:15 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-madame_zora@Mar 1 2005, 05:48 AM
Yes, I basically agree with your premise, most women will choose a guy based more on personality and relationship issues than penis size concerns. While I do think that a woman who has been with larger men may be more predisposed to liking larger, it really depends on the woman&#39;s own size. A smaller size woman may well be relieved of the burden, while a larger (vagina size) woman may find she misses the extra inches. Also, women who are comfortable enough with themselves to fully enjoy sex at all are still in the relative minority. We must remember that different studies report different facts, but it&#39;s safe to say that between 25 to 50% of women do not experience orgasm with their partners at all&#33; While guys are wondering if their penis is big enough, women just wish they&#39;d notice us at all&#33;

True size queens (like me) are in the extreme minority, I don&#39;t care what anyone says. I&#39;ve been seeing a guy for over a month now, and he says he&#39;s never before met a woman for whom it was a prerequisite. He says he was turned on by it, but it had never occured to him before and that his previous lovers (mainly) hadn&#39;t known until they got there.

I&#39;ve met quite a few hung guys this past year, but this is the first guy I&#39;ve been interested in for a relationship, so it certainly wasn&#39;t a "size only" thing at all, just a "size first, then see what else we have in common" thing. Most guys not familiar with this site aren&#39;t what I expected, because A) they&#39;ve found it hot that I was into their size, B) they&#39;ve been very willing to talk about their experiences, even if it was clear that we weren&#39;t going anywhere and C) a sex-only meeting was agreeable to most, since they had a choice of whether to reply to my ad or not.
Despite what may seem like a sterile way of meeting someone, I am quite pleased with the results, as I would never have met the guy I&#39;m seeing now if not for that, and we are having a blast in the whole "getting to know you" phase.

[post=287257]Quoted post[/post]​

So i guess my question to you is...if size is a prerequisite to dating you...how do you determine size? Can you just look at the person and guess? Or do you, after dating a couple times...get them to the point you&#39;re about to sleep with them, have him drop his pants...and if he&#39;s large...go for it...if not, leave?

[post=287392]Quoted post[/post]​

[/b][/quote]

Hi here - be gentle with me - it&#39;s my first post ...

I used to think that it didn&#39;t make a difference but I&#39;ve found subsequently that it does - even if they don&#39;t tell anyone else ... I guess it&#39;s a confidence thing for me ...

 

[D_Humper E Bogart]

Originally posted by madame_zora@Mar 1 2005, 11:58 PM
LOL&#33; No, I ran an ad (not kidding) and some men responded.

[post=287473]Quoted post[/post]​

Holy crap. Didn&#39;t know those things worked.

WANTED: One female intelligant mixed-race mutt with glasses and long hair. Must have a sense of humour...."

 

[jonb]

I can get you a good-looking single black female who LOVES to play, walk in the woods, ride in your pickup truck, go on hunting and fishing trips, and lie by the fire. She&#39;ll be eating out of your hand, and she loves it when you rub her the right way. And every day, when you come home from work, she&#39;ll be there to greet you, naked.

My friend&#39;s Lab just had pups.

 

[madame_zora]

Jonb, you are wicked&#33;

Orca, you should soooooo do it&#33; I probably met two dozen guys over the last year, I revised my ad several times, and I finally found someone I seem to be really compatible with. Also, try several different sites because different people are attracted to different sites and it increases your chances of finding someone in your area. What&#39;s wrong with asking for what you want?

 

[D_Barbi_Queue]

Originally posted by ORCABOMBER+Mar 2 2005, 04:05 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(ORCABOMBER &#064; Mar 2 2005, 04:05 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-madame_zora@Mar 1 2005, 11:58 PM
LOL&#33; No, I ran an ad (not kidding) and some men responded.

[post=287473]Quoted post[/post]​

Holy crap. Didn&#39;t know those things worked.

WANTED: One female intelligant mixed-race mutt with glasses and long hair. Must have a sense of humour...."

[post=287619]Quoted post[/post]​

[/b][/quote]

hey...that&#39;s me&#33; sorry I&#39;m already taken though.

Ok, but seriously back to the topic. I suppose that I could see some truth to it, even though it is based on huge generalizations. My current man is average and I&#39;ve been with a couple of larger guys....no "horses" though. But I choose my hubby b/c he&#39;s everything I look for in a guy. Size mostly doesn&#39;t matter to me as long as they know how to work it. But I at least want something I can feel. I wouldn&#39;t ever leave my hubby for a larger guy though.

 

[philberttrw]

I think penile size played a larger role in any form of sexual selection back in primitive societies, where clothing wasn&#39;t used to cover the genitals and the junk was there for all to see.

I would imagine women (and any gays of the day) would have used obvious visuals to select their mates.

These days, though, it&#39;s more about a fat wallet and well-groomed-ness than anything. Rarely do you find someone hunting for their beau with their crotch fullness in mind, and I think 90% of those who do are currently members of this site&#33;

...I think this came out weird. Yeah, sorry &#39;bout that. Meds make me delirious.

 

[madame_zora]

Originally posted by philberttrw@Mar 2 2005, 11:39 PM
I think penile size played a larger role in any form of sexual selection back in primitive societies, where clothing wasn&#39;t used to cover the genitals and the junk was there for all to see.

I would imagine women (and any gays of the day) would have used obvious visuals to select their mates.

These days, though, it&#39;s more about a fat wallet and well-groomed-ness than anything. Rarely do you find someone hunting for their beau with their crotch fullness in mind, and I think 90% of those who do are currently members of this site&#33;

...I think this came out weird. Yeah, sorry &#39;bout that. Meds make me delirious.

[post=287839]Quoted post[/post]​

But you&#39;re so cute when you&#39;re delirious&#33;

 

[big_peter]

Originally posted by TexAssgirl@Mar 2 2005, 06:28 PM

hey...that&#39;s me&#33; sorry I&#39;m already taken though.

Ok, but seriously back to the topic. I suppose that I could see some truth to it, even though it is based on huge generalizations. My current man is average and I&#39;ve been with a couple of larger guys....no "horses" though. But I choose my hubby b/c he&#39;s everything I look for in a guy. Size mostly doesn&#39;t matter to me as long as they know how to work it. But I at least want something I can feel. I wouldn&#39;t ever leave my hubby for a larger guy though.

[post=287834]Quoted post[/post]​

"work it" ???
must be doing something wrong&#33;

 

[D_Humper E Bogart]

Originally posted by jonb@Mar 2 2005, 09:14 PM
I can get you a good-looking single black female who LOVES to play, walk in the woods, ride in your pickup truck, go on hunting and fishing trips, and lie by the fire. She&#39;ll be eating out of your hand, and she loves it when you rub her the right way. And every day, when you come home from work, she&#39;ll be there to greet you, naked.

My friend&#39;s Lab just had pups.

[post=287784]Quoted post[/post]​

*Badum-tish&#33;* :wow:
-----------
Zora...perhaps when I&#39;ve got a career to speak of. Of course, this&#39;ll probably put a lot of people off, although I do know that "men of science" calanders are popular. So someone must find an IQ and cute body sexy&#33;
-----------
Texass...I&#39;m adding you to the list of "people to clone by 2020"
-----------
Hey Morethan, well there&#39;s nothing wrong with having a preferance.

 

[madame_zora]

Orca, I don&#39;t think having a career is a prerequisite of dating&#33; I&#39;m pretty sure being in college is a damned fine start. Besides, how can you deprive the poor women of the UK of your fine self? *kishes*

 

[big_peter]

Originally posted by madame_zora@Mar 3 2005, 05:09 AM
Orca, I don&#39;t think having a career is a prerequisite of dating&#33; I&#39;m pretty sure being in college is a damned fine start. Besides, how can you deprive the poor women of the UK of your fine self? *kishes*

[post=287983]Quoted post[/post]​

... and besides... there must be Something to do between classes...

 

[D_Humper E Bogart]

Originally posted by big_peter+Mar 3 2005, 12:50 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(big_peter &#064; Mar 3 2005, 12:50 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-madame_zora@Mar 3 2005, 05:09 AM
Orca, I don&#39;t think having a career is a prerequisite of dating&#33; I&#39;m pretty sure being in college is a damned fine start. Besides, how can you deprive the poor women of the UK of your fine self? *kishes*

[post=287983]Quoted post[/post]​

... and besides... there must be Something to do between classes...

[post=287994]Quoted post[/post]​

[/b][/quote]
Well, I work after school&#33; I mean, you&#39;ve gotta have bling if you want c-ching&#33; (I just made that phrase up&#33 Anyway, I&#39;m not sure what people think of me at uni most of the time. I&#39;m not "super-sexay" nor "super-intelligant". I&#39;m just me...whatever that is.

Anyway, the very thought that someone would seriously be pining for me is hillarious&#33;

 

[13788]

orionsword57: .....women, for the most part, engage in sexual activity because they have feelings for the guy. Whereas men, can fuck just for the fuck of it lol. A woman, generally speaking, is more about the substance of the person, then the physical, which is different then a guy....

I&#39;d like to say from the point of view of someone of my age and with my history that generalizing gets one into trouble once in a while. I&#39;ll risk being chastised as a new poster for going into a diatribe of sorts, but here goes. My wife and I didn&#39;t actually "chose" each other for we were "matched" as a couple that made our living giving live sex shows in the 40&#39;s and 50&#39;s in NYC. We literally fell in love while we were performing and when we were together before and after "going on". We fell in love for all the reasons. We developed a life together, however, where the true lovemaking came in between the times we fucked. When we fucked, we fucked for the sheer pleasure and fulfillment of fucking, and nothing else. That attitude allowed us initially to do the things that we did in front of an audience, but it served us well for as long as she lived. We had and could do what the other wanted, and we each took as good as we gave. In that regard as well, we cared deeply for each other and could be as tender and understanding as the other. Balzac writes that one person in each union secretly wants out, but that was not the case with us. We loved everything about each other, and indeed, our idiosyncracies became the other&#39;s necessities.

In subsequent relationships after her death, I (and they) was in them for the sex, and I guess the fact that I still wore my love for her on my sleeve made it easier for the women who chose to be with me to keep the relationships at the levels they were.

Sorry to rant. I hope I don&#39;t vote myself off the island.

 

[13788]

pdrprst: On the contrary Orion, that was very moving. I hope I can find someone that I care about that deeply in my lifetime.

As for spreading the love at Uni. . .sex in college?

I wasn&#39;t aware that students engaged in such activities. :wow:

Orca, go get &#39;em boy&#33;

 

[13788]

srv524:

Originally posted by TheOverlord@Feb 27 2005, 06:32 AM
Some say the intent of men is just to pass on the genes, where as to women want someone who can protect them and their children.

Thus the reason a guy will screw anyone semi-attractive to them, but women are usually a bit more selective on who their mates are.

[post=286781]Quoted post[/post]​

Well, this is the basic nomadic principle that men like to spread their seed and women like to protect their children. It&#39;s the basis of nature, and no matter how old and mature we get, there are still some of those basic nomadic principles. That&#39;s why guys get jealous and furious over a wife cheating, it&#39;s the idea that he has competition, another mate, one that could be impregnating his wife and stealing his seed....etc etc.

 

[surferboy]

Originally posted by Dr. Dilznick+Feb 27 2005, 11:59 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Dr. Dilznick &#064; Feb 27 2005, 11:59 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-txquis@Feb 27 2005, 09:25 AM
And...Nix, i wish i knew girls who liked porn.
I have never known one who did, in fact....the opposite.

[post=286842]Quoted post[/post]​

Probably because most of it is very male-oriented and degrading to women.

I mean sure, *some* girls may get off on that, but I can&#39;t even watch that shit most of the times. And faking an orgasm really is a turn-off for me. Most of the men in porn are a bunch of lames who wouldn&#39;t know how to get a girl off if their lives depended on it. Then you have the asshole wife-beater types determined to make the experience as uncomfortable for them as possible. It annoys the fuck out of me.

[post=286863]Quoted post[/post]​

[/b][/quote]


I don&#39;t buy into that "degrading to women" bullshit. The girls (and guys) who do porn are in the industry because they want to be. No one is forcing anyone to do it.

 

[13788]

hung_big: I think he meant degrading to women in general, not to the one in the video. Most vids seem to have some "big" cocked guy banging a chick and she is just easy and passive. If I were a girl I wouldn&#39;t get off on that, because its just like, the girl is just a sex object.

I dunno why that is different for guys, but it seems to be

 

[surferboy]

Originally posted by hung_big@Mar 8 2005, 10:57 PM
I think he meant degrading to women in general, not to the one in the video. Most vids seem to have some "big" cocked guy banging a chick and she is just easy and passive. If I were a girl I wouldn&#39;t get off on that, because its just like, the girl is just a sex object.

I dunno why that is different for guys, but it seems to be

[post=289402]Quoted post[/post]​

Still, I don&#39;t think it&#39;s degrading at all. Hell, even my mom doesn&#39;t think it&#39;s degrading to women.

 

[D_Humper E Bogart]

Originally posted by pdrprst@Mar 6 2005, 05:55 AM
On the contrary Orion, that was very moving. I hope I can find someone that I care about that deeply in my lifetime.

As for spreading the love at Uni. . .sex in college?

I wasn&#39;t aware that students engaged in such activities. :wow:

Orca, go get &#39;em boy&#33;

[post=288677]Quoted post[/post]​

Ain&#39;t happening for a while at least&#33;

 

[Dr. Dilznick]

Originally posted by surferboy@Mar 8 2005, 06:40 PM
I don&#39;t buy into that "degrading to women" bullshit. The girls (and guys) who do porn are in the industry because they want to be. No one is forcing anyone to do it.

[post=289351]Quoted post[/post]​

99 percent of these women are only in it for the money. Not because they love to get beast-fucked on camera.