Me and my girlfriends theory on size...

madame_zora

Sexy Member
Joined
May 5, 2004
Posts
9,608
Media
0
Likes
52
Points
258
Location
Ohio
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Yeah, and I haven't fucked many women, so I can only go by surveys! I think you're right in assuming that educated women would be more able to express themselves. They'd also be more likely to have more self worth and think their own needs were worth addressing. I was only talking about the general population, not any one group expressly, but I can see how one's experience in college would be fairly different. Thanks for the enlightenment.
 

Alley Blue

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2005
Posts
1,151
Media
0
Likes
25
Points
183
Age
34
Location
New York
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
Originally posted by Misty@Apr 13 2005, 12:09 PM
Take a look at gay women. Do they all enjoy fisting? No, only a very small percentage like that sensation. If they use a strap-on toy do they buy the biggest one possible? No, its mostly just average size. If they buy a dildo or vibrator, do they buy the biggest one? No, very few would buy anything over 6 inches and average thickness. Actually, that's a real distinction between men and women. Men will buy the biggest dildo or vibe for their partner, while women will buy something 'comfortable' (which almost always means average size).
[post=300257]Quoted post[/post]​

M.Zora is totally right, ladies like Misty should really visit here more often.
What you wrote Misty was a real I opener.......I really leanered alot from your post.......it really helps guys realize what women really want, and not what we think they want....
 

vega

1st Like
Joined
Dec 8, 2004
Posts
170
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
238
Age
34
Location
Ma
No matter a girls opinion on size it still matters to her.

If she prefers larger or smaller she has a preference and it matters. I know many girls that do not want anything more than 6 and that is a preference.

So by my theories size matters to all girls it just depends on the perspective.
 

madame_zora

Sexy Member
Joined
May 5, 2004
Posts
9,608
Media
0
Likes
52
Points
258
Location
Ohio
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
I strongly disagree with that theory, Vega. I think there are a lot of women who are just eager to see you naked, they are not expecting any certain size. Of course, most of my friends are closer to my age, so I can't speak for the younger set, but I know this to be true of the 30 and over crowd, that lots of them don't care at all. Sure, there are some who have a preference for a certain size, but a whole lot are more into the intimacy and sharing than specific ideas about penis size.
 

Freddie53

Superior Member
Gold
Joined
Nov 19, 2004
Posts
5,842
Media
0
Likes
2,609
Points
333
Location
Memphis (Tennessee, United States)
Gender
Male
[post=300467]Quoted post[/post]​
[/quote]



3) No one can agree on where the fluid from female ejaculation comes from. Is it the Cowper's glands, the Skene's glands, What percentage is water, urine, etc. Porn has done little to validate the real phenomena by creating such ridiculously fake exhibitions, but by all means, ask a guy who's been drenched by a woman, and he'll tell you it doesn't smell like amonia (like it does if she loses bladder control and pees on him) and the flood of water is intense.


Jana,

I have not been with many women at all. But I do know the difference between fluid from the vagina and from the bladder. And I do know that when a woman gets excited enough the sheets will probably be wet with vaginal fluid. After all, an unaroused vagina is hard to penetrate at first. As it is aroused it becomes encourged with fluid or at least the women I have been with do. And the longer the sex goes the wetter they usually get. And yes I have felt fluid coming from somewhere in the vagina when they have had an orgasm. I am no expert here. I don't know anything about all the names of all the glands. But I do know the fluid comes from within the vagina. Yes there has been a loss of urine a time or two and that is easily distinguishable.

The fact that "experts" have discussed this makes me agree with you. They haven't had sex with a woman who had an orgasm or they wouldn't be making those rediculous claims. I do think that orgasms are different for women then men. But that doesn't mean that they are more enjoyable or intense for either gender. But we will never know for sure. It is not like ordering two differnt brands of vanilla ice cream and seeing which one you like best and see if you can taste the difference. No one at least with present technology can have experienced orgasm as both a male and a female.

It is my personal belief that women have the capacity to enjoy more orgasms then men. A truly liberated woman may be able to experience an even more intense orgasm than a man. I don't know.

I suspect that the intensity of orgasm has more to do with the individual, age, health, complications from diseases, who you are with, and your own personal sex drive that you allow youself to have, and what you were taught and believe. I suspect gender is a very secondary factor. But I know no way to prove that.

I think that there are a lot of women who don't experience orgasm and some even dread sex. Many times it is the man's fault. A man should never penetrate a woman until there has been enough foreplay to get the vagina aroused and wet enough to allow the penis to slip in without any pain or discomfort.

But too many guys just want to stick it in, get their kicks and pull out. No their "woman" probably won't have an orgasm and will come to despise sex. It is the job of both genders to see what the needs of their partners are in sex activity wither it be gay or straight. If you fulfill the needs of your partner first, then you will find your own needs are met as well.

This is just one man's opinion on a woman and a womans orgasm. And it comes from experience and not from a book.

Yes, it is true that I find men more sexually stimulating than women, but that doesn't mean that I don't know understand what women need.

In closing, I find it so ironic that gay men seem to understand women's needs more than most straight men. I have often wondered why that is true.
 

willie

Just Browsing
Joined
Apr 13, 2005
Posts
85
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
151
Age
71
Originally posted by Freddie53@Apr 15 2005, 05:40 AM
But too many guys just want to stick it in, get their kicks and pull out. No their "woman" probably won't have an orgasm and will come to despise sex.

Here's another way of looking at it.

It's the duty of a man to serve his woman. (Ancient turn of phrase.)

Making a man orgasm, isn't really skilled labour.
However, with a woman it's a serious, but deeply satisfying job.
Having an orgasm, does really seem to totally envelop a woman and you get the impression that it's a far deeper experience, than with a man.

Somehow girls do seem to have twisted things around, so that if you are a very good boy, they will let you 'dip your wick'. Whereas it's the girl who's really desperate, for some serious attention.
Fail to provide, at your peril. It can become a vicious circle.
 

D_Humper E Bogart

Experimental Member
Joined
May 10, 2004
Posts
2,172
Media
0
Likes
4
Points
258
Hey! Bet someone must have thought Id died.

Anyhow, I have to disagree to an extent, yes, men have orgasms easily, but it's whether they were any "good" that matters.

Balls and brains really. Sometimes you can just come to feed a biological urge, but to get real pleasure is something else.

As for scientic research, scientists get laid?? Well, I know I should probably subscribe to the "men of science" calenders, but I'm sure the ones doing the research aren't!
 

madame_zora

Sexy Member
Joined
May 5, 2004
Posts
9,608
Media
0
Likes
52
Points
258
Location
Ohio
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Hola! Welcome back Orca, where have you been?

You're probably right about the scientist theory, but even doctors? Somebody has to get laid!


@Freddie, I can't begin to tell you how gratifying it is to hear a man who's been married confirm the reality of female ejaculation. Just because someone hasn't seen something themselves doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

I have always wondered why gay men know more about women than str8 men, no wonder I'm a fag hag.
 

D_Humper E Bogart

Experimental Member
Joined
May 10, 2004
Posts
2,172
Media
0
Likes
4
Points
258
Hey Jana. I'm currently in my exam period, and working 7pm-2am otherwise! I need another life!

Well, Doctors are nice people. Me, I'm a master of impersonating mad scientists, it's too easy, of course, whether that's a turn on is based on how much you like being a "mad assistant", but that might be a bit Kinky. :eek:
 

madame_zora

Sexy Member
Joined
May 5, 2004
Posts
9,608
Media
0
Likes
52
Points
258
Location
Ohio
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Originally posted by ORCABOMBER@May 6 2005, 11:54 AM
Hey Jana. I'm currently in my exam period, and working 7pm-2am otherwise! I need another life!

Well, Doctors are nice people. Me, I'm a master of impersonating mad scientists, it's too easy, of course, whether that's a turn on is based on how much you like being a "mad assistant", but that might be a bit Kinky. :eek:
[post=308526]Quoted post[/post]​


*begins furiously working on white lab coat and "little naughties" to wear underneath for Mad Scientist/Mad Assistant game*

I've got the beakers!
 

wispandex_bulge

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2004
Posts
371
Media
1
Likes
15
Points
238
Location
Wisconsin
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Originally posted by ziggity@Feb 27 2005, 02:58 AM
it goes much deeper. i remember a fascinating documentary about sexual attraction and its connections to instinct... one part of it consisted of an experiment like this:

a small number of women are given sweaty undershirts and told to order them from worst to best smelling (or least nasty, i guess).

they almost unanimously chose the "more masculine" sweat-donors. men who were fit, had strong jawlines, masculine musculature..
[post=286800]Quoted post[/post]​

Could be, but I head of a similar experiment done which I think is far mor interesting...

One researcher had 6 women wear a shirt for two days without washing it...then the shirts were put in a freezer to prevent chemical breakdown of the bodily rub-off and they gave blood for an immunohistology analysis. Basically they were looking for natural genetic resistances and immune system strengtheners.

Then he had the same bloodwork done on him. Once they had the results, they were kept secret and he took out the shirts and rated them from most attractive to least attractive. Two were very close and so he allowed two to tie.

His theory was that more compatible mates would arise from differing genetic immunities leading to the possibility of stronger more viable offspring...its natures way of pushing for gentic mixing. When they compared his smell test to the immunochemistry...he had matched them exactly in the order his theory had predicted! The girl with whom he had the fewest matching genetic factors was the one he foudn most attractive by smell, and the two he couldnt decide between had the same number of differences form him...

This really amazed me and made me a complete beleiver in the ability of the invisible chemistry which drives us all! (Maybe I shoudl mention that I am a chemist by training, but I dont think that biases me too much)
 

D_Humper E Bogart

Experimental Member
Joined
May 10, 2004
Posts
2,172
Media
0
Likes
4
Points
258
Well, what do you think underwear sniffers get turned on by? Oh yeah, and this really works, I should know (not the undie-sniffing!) but have you noticed your relatives smell awful when sweaty, but a girl you really like can smell fine?

Goddam, gives me a bone thinking about it! *ahem*

I saw that experiment on TV, it's really fascinating, but you have to be careful, because with these sort of things, not to jump to conclusion.

-----
Zora, you know what scientists really wear latex gloves for, *wink*