Measured porn stars??

goldzilla

Superior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2016
Posts
3,295
Media
0
Likes
7,670
Points
183
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I have to take a closer look, but I think I counted 21cm down to the base where she pushes it into the side

upload_2020-3-12_15-27-6.png


upload_2020-3-12_15-25-59.png


It's 27cm which is over 10.5 inches. But it's a side measurement and we cannot see which numbers she starts the tape, but it starts on his leg. He wouldn't be more than 8 properly measured.

The video is here 「知らない女だけが損をする!世界最大級のメガチ○ポで強制フェラ/ハメ潮/生中出しをヤる」(1/ 2) - 視頻 - ThisAV.com - 世界第一中文成人娛樂網站 the measurement around 43minutes.
 

Narz

Loved Member
Joined
May 12, 2013
Posts
556
Media
0
Likes
730
Points
188
Location
Vienna (Austria)
View attachment 13628821

View attachment 13628801

It's 27cm which is over 10.5 inches. But it's a side measurement and we cannot see which numbers she starts the tape, but it starts on his leg. He wouldn't be more than 8 properly measured.

The video is here 「知らない女だけが損をする!世界最大級のメガチ○ポで強制フェラ/ハメ潮/生中出しをヤる」(1/ 2) - 視頻 - ThisAV.com - 世界第一中文成人娛樂網站 the measurement around 43minutes.

The 27cm are between a cut. They rolled it up at the base.

In some of my pictures you can see some numbers clearly. Like on the pic where she is holding the tape above his dick it's easy to make it 11cm
View attachment 13628821

View attachment 13628801

It's 27cm which is over 10.5 inches. But it's a side measurement and we cannot see which numbers she starts the tape, but it starts on his leg. He wouldn't be more than 8 properly measured.

The video is here 「知らない女だけが損をする!世界最大級のメガチ○ポで強制フェラ/ハメ潮/生中出しをヤる」(1/ 2) - 視頻 - ThisAV.com - 世界第一中文成人娛樂網站 the measurement around 43minutes.

The 27cm measurement is bullshit. That's after a cut and they clearly rolled up the tape at the base - which is why they aren't showing it.

In some of my pics you can make out individual numbers. Like in the one where the tape is above his cock you can clearly see 11cm and 20cm
 

Solarpulse4

Legendary Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2020
Posts
382
Media
0
Likes
1,056
Points
138
Location
Washington (Washington, D.C., United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Good to see more actual measurements. Cheating or not we find a way to bust 'em and I'm glad that's what we do here. Regarding Rico, I do believe his erections suffered due to his injury, an erection lasting much longer than four hours after the use of an injection I believe. If this video was filmed after I do believe he should be fully and properly healed. Although in my personal opinion I find it horrifying to see his dick from the under-side it looks like a literal pole.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JGUIDO

goldzilla

Superior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2016
Posts
3,295
Media
0
Likes
7,670
Points
183
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Maybe he'd be 8 inches in his prime and when he was thinner.

Also he had that injury years back too IIRC.

I am sure he was 8 inches in his prime at the most, the reason I say this is because he was only a tad longer than Chris Strokes and they did a scene together and we all know Strokes size here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JGUIDO and Clod

JGUIDO

Superior Member
Joined
May 18, 2012
Posts
2,120
Media
0
Likes
6,056
Points
258
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Too hard to tell based on that pic IMO plus it looks edited. The lines around the dick are way to clean and what not.
 

Adrok

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2019
Posts
69
Media
0
Likes
103
Points
43
Location
Phoenix (Arizona, United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Can anyone check my Math here.

B731E717-EEFB-4D52-84AA-5A9704C66422.jpeg
This guy is measured at about 16.5 which would make him about 6.5 inches.

44BB83A0-72BC-4A5B-9AC3-0685C7BBACE8.png
But the thing is that in this image the metal part hides the first cm of tape. In the first image the metal part isn’t really visible because it’s pointed upward instead of flat on his shaft.

At first I thought this would increase his length making him 7 Inches NBP which makes sense considering how big it looks but then I figured out it actually makes him longer by hiding part of the measure, basically cheating.

which means he is actually 6inches NBP, right?

24C83F78-6DDB-4D3E-A90F-49A852A3B342.jpeg


1286EB6D-691C-4410-B93B-9311BDFD34E1.jpeg


here’s the video
I measure his cock and then I stroke it and finally he cums on my big boobs
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obunga123

engineer805

Legendary Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Posts
415
Media
11
Likes
1,389
Points
438
Location
Ontario, California, US
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
I don't think the fact that the hook-tab on the scale covers up to the 1 cm mark is cheating. Look at the space between 1 and 2 cm - it's about the same as the length of the metal tab. But, if you check the angled shot and do a little correcting for parallax error - making the end at about 12 cm - and then compensate for the distance from tab to base - about 2 or 3 cm - you end up at 14 to 15 cm - which is about average. Looking at the diameter, there's no way it has circumference of 6" either. It looks big in the screen shot because of the upward camera angle ... and he's likely just a smaller guy in general. 8" x 6" is an exciting number to talk - and I hear lots of guys exaggerate at lot - but the photos and measurements prove this guy is just about average size - and that's perfectly fine! Just my 2-cents worth as an engineer!
 

Adrok

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2019
Posts
69
Media
0
Likes
103
Points
43
Location
Phoenix (Arizona, United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I don't think the fact that the hook-tab on the scale covers up to the 1 cm mark is cheating. Look at the space between 1 and 2 cm - it's about the same as the length of the metal tab. But, if you check the angled shot and do a little correcting for parallax error - making the end at about 12 cm - and then compensate for the distance from tab to base - about 2 or 3 cm - you end up at 14 to 15 cm - which is about average. Looking at the diameter, there's no way it has circumference of 6" either. It looks big in the screen shot because of the upward camera angle ... and he's likely just a smaller guy in general. 8" x 6" is an exciting number to talk - and I hear lots of guys exaggerate at lot - but the photos and measurements prove this guy is just about average size - and that's perfectly fine! Just my 2-cents worth as an engineer!

I didn’t mean that the tab covering the first cm was cheating, I meant that the tab isn’t visible in the first image because it’s vertical on his pelvis, basically making it start at the 2cm mark.
 

JGUIDO

Superior Member
Joined
May 18, 2012
Posts
2,120
Media
0
Likes
6,056
Points
258
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
He is like 15 maybe 15.5 cm NBP IMO. (5.9-6.1 inches) And thats at the MAX.

Which is cool IMO because that would make him just over average and look at how big he looks in those pics.

Many would see the bottom two pictures and think the guys is packing 7+ inches.
 

Torc

Legendary Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2020
Posts
267
Media
0
Likes
1,982
Points
288
Location
Boston (Massachusetts, United States)
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
Louie Smalls with an 8.66 inch JBL Charge4 speaker:

JQVeEq0.jpg


His old ruler measurement shot.

Based on comparisons with Jason Luv I would have said he was between 6.75 and 7 long and 6 thick.... ?
 

JGUIDO

Superior Member
Joined
May 18, 2012
Posts
2,120
Media
0
Likes
6,056
Points
258
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Doubtful that Louie Smalls is more than 5.75 inches of girth, I'd say he is around 5.5 inches of girth. Manuel's girth is just a bit over 6 inches IIRC and Shane Diesel is just about 6.5 so Louie is probably under 5.75 and Jason Luv is probably between 5.75 and 6.
 

Lance Bass

Superior Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2017
Posts
3,504
Media
0
Likes
3,412
Points
148
Location
Indian Springs (Maryland, United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
  • Like
Reactions: JGUIDO