I'm probably doing the math wrong, but if Riley's hand breadth is no more than 2.897 and she can place 2.438 on his dick won't that make him approximately 7.06?
Measured porn stars??
- Thread starter _avg_
- Start date
Is anyone interested in creating a sticky that is just a list of estimates of pornstars?
-it would be linked back to this thread for discussions
-it could be extended out as data for creating a chart (I'm sure the mods could find a template so entered data would create a master-averaged-estimate for each pornstar; length x girth and then maybe +/- range that are at the limits of what variability you'd willingly believe possible)
-that template could be updated if anyone's mind changed about a measurement/estimate
-separate threads per pornstar could be created so images and videos could be collated along with any statements
-statistical information about the estimates could be fleshed out, high/low/median/etc, anything else we can come up with
It would essentially stand as a collection of visual estimates of size. It might help people realize how far off or how close they might be and help more clearly delineate the basis for estimates and even lead to some changes in how one estimates. Sure there's plenty of info in this thread but it might be time to circle back and separate out the results of so much discussion. That way you don't have to sort through the search results for each pornstar, it would just be there in one place.
We could start by creating the full list of pornstars we want to be in that list.
-it would be linked back to this thread for discussions
-it could be extended out as data for creating a chart (I'm sure the mods could find a template so entered data would create a master-averaged-estimate for each pornstar; length x girth and then maybe +/- range that are at the limits of what variability you'd willingly believe possible)
-that template could be updated if anyone's mind changed about a measurement/estimate
-separate threads per pornstar could be created so images and videos could be collated along with any statements
-statistical information about the estimates could be fleshed out, high/low/median/etc, anything else we can come up with
It would essentially stand as a collection of visual estimates of size. It might help people realize how far off or how close they might be and help more clearly delineate the basis for estimates and even lead to some changes in how one estimates. Sure there's plenty of info in this thread but it might be time to circle back and separate out the results of so much discussion. That way you don't have to sort through the search results for each pornstar, it would just be there in one place.
We could start by creating the full list of pornstars we want to be in that list.
Well there are so many pornstars out there though we are most likely going to miss one that people want to know about. Is there by any chance that you could make a list of guys that you want estimates for?
People here seem to have their favorites. I skim through this and see names I don't know often so this might best be left up to the diehards here.
This, because from what I have noticed even a 6.5 incher can be a 2 hander for your average woman.
If you ”as the original source” refer to the writing
”Consistent and strongest significant correlation was between flaccid stretched or erect length and height, which ranged from r = 0.2 to 0.6.”
https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bju.13010
(I am not sure what that actually means. It may be that there is a link but not that it is considered as a strong link.)
The article I referred to:
How big is the average penis? | Science | AAAS
The researchers concluded that there was NO STRONG evidence to link penis size to other physical features such as height, body mass index, or even shoe size.
Additional sources:
1:
Am I normal? Review Analyzes Data on Flaccid and Erect Penis Lengths in Men - BJUI
Dr. David Veale, of King’s College London and the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, and his colleague from King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, set out to create such a nomogram of male penis size measurements across all ages and races. A search of the medical literature revealed 17 studies with up to 15,521 males who underwent penis size measurements by health professionals using a standard procedure. The nomograms revealed that the average length of a flaccid penis was 9.16 cm, the average length of a flaccid stretched penis was 13.24 cm, and the average length of an erect penis was 13.12 cm. The average flaccid circumference was 9.31 cm, and the average erect circumference was 11.66 cm. THERE WAS A SMALL correlation between erect length and height.
2:
'Am I Normal?' Check Biggest Study Yet Of Penis Size, Among 15,000 Men
Dr. Morgentaler holds out some hope: "I think information is powerful," he says, and reality checks can help. For example, the study debunks urban lore linking the size of a man's penis with his finger length and shoe size, and shows that EVEN THE LINK WITH HEIGHT IS WEAK, he notes.
- Narz,
I quoted the Veale Meta-Analysis directly. You quote a second-hand article that misquotes Veale. Veale mentions a statistically significant correlation with height, but not with other somatric parameters - which your second-hand source simply ignores.
A direct source is always better than an indirect one.
This is also merely an indirect source.
Veale mentions that the correlation ranged from 0.2 to 0.6 - which is all the way from weak, over moderate to strong.
Why are you even linking this?
You claimed that there's no correlation. Yet this shows that there is indeed a correlation.
A weak, but significant correlation is still a link. In statistics they would say that there's no significant correlation if there wasn't any, but a weak correlation means that there is a link, but that it's not perfect.
This is data from a large study in Amsterdam. If you plot height and medically-measured BP length you can clearly see the correlation, although it's only weak.
It's only weak, but you can clearly see that the average for taller guys is higher than the average for shorter guys.
the second article is funn y if i understand it
There a case where they self reported their size, and another where they was measured
They all lied lol there a guy who was 16 cm and claimed to be 24 cm ? lol
I don’t give them it cause it’s a no-win situation. If you say true NBP, they’ll likely think it’s small compared to what other guys tell them. But if you exaggerate and you end up fucking them, there’s possible let down. I usually just tell the truth but omit actual number- I say “I’m bigger than average”. Or, I’ve said “it’s big but not a horse cock.”
Yeah, I can’t think of a body part that wouldn’t be larger on average in taller (larger) people. I’ll bet every organ, limb, bone, gland, etc is bigger on average in taller folk...even if only a tiny correlation.
Astream reply:
If you ”as the original source/direct source" refer to the writing
”Consistent and strongest significant correlation was between flaccid stretched or erect length and height, which ranged from r = 0.2 to 0.6.”
https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bju.13010
I agree that a direct/original source may be better than an indirect, as long as ONE ARE CAPABLE TO INTERPRET THE WORDING/WRITING/MEANING/DATA OF A DIRECT SOURCE......
I would guess that the "indirect" sources*** I linked to; www.sciencemag.org and www.bjuinternational.com are seen as capable and credible sources and competent to interpret and/or write about the Veale study
Up to anyone to look the sources up
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Astream reply:
Yes an indirect source from www.bjuinternational.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Astream reply:
I, FOR ONE, DO NOT KNOW how the "Veale study" and/or the wording
”Consistent and strongest significant correlation was between flaccid stretched or erect length and height, which ranged from r = 0.2 to 0.6.” should be interpreted.
UP TO ANYONE READING THIS POST TO EVALUATE IF THEY SHOULD LISTEN to YOUR interpretation or SOURCES*** from:
www.bjuinternational.com
www.sciencemag.org
......or any other source for that matter
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Astream reply:
1. I HAVE NOT claimed that there is no correlation. Read my posts again. I wrote:
2. What I have also done is linking to sources*** on the "Veale study" in regards of height and penis size. Wording and links below:
I. "NO STRONG EVIDENCE" How big is the average penis? | Science | AAAS (sciencemag.org)
II. "THERE WAS A SMALL correlation between erect length and height" Am I normal? Review Analyzes Data on Flaccid and Erect Penis Lengths in Men - BJUI (bjuinternational.com)
III. "EVEN THE LINK WITH HEIGHT IS WEAK" 'Am I Normal?' Check Biggest Study Yet Of Penis Size, Among 15,000 Men | CommonHealth (wbur.org)
From what I understand; None of these sources claim that there is NO CORRELATION. But to use the BJUI wording "There was a small correlation".
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Astream reply:
I do not know how this "Amsterdam study" takes into account for example:
1. self-reporting, which doesn’t always yield reliable results
2. bias towards men with larger penis size applying and included in a study
Perhaps the Amsterdam study is a credible study. I am not sure if I will look it up.
In any case "THE VEALE STUDY", their new study synthesizes data from 17 previous academic papers that included measurements from a total of 15,521 men from around the world.
seem to be considered as credible
you tell them "it's big" with 6.25 x 5 ?? those to whom you tell this are they not disappointed?
i’m 7.3 nbp and 7,9~8bp .
I never give my size but if she will insist, I will answer laconically 7.5 .
Say bone pressed. Because even if none pressed adds an inch to your non bone pressed size, she’ll be adding an inch anyway from bad visual estimating (girl inches) so it’s all good.
- Clod,
I never quite understood this issue, reason being if you are generally bigger than the average man it would be or should be very obvious. So a woman can tell you she's had a certain size, which 9/10 times is an exaggeration on the part of her previous partners as this site continues to prove. Why not tell her your real size because if you are generally bigger than the average Joe and you mention your size it would start to put things into perspective for her and others
I’m not 5.0 girth. It’s 5.3 mid shaft and about 6 at base. Anyways 6.25 X 5.3 is > 97 percentile for volume...so yeah, it is big. But you know that you’re just trolling.
Now that I think about it, I don’t believe I’ve ever had sex with one that asked. It happened in a group situation 1-2 x in jr. high or HS, and then maybe 1-2 x since.
