Measured porn stars??

mjeannin

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2018
Posts
73
Media
0
Likes
66
Points
28
Location
Los Angeles (California, United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
He also said some other pornstar was bigger than him when they arent
Lex never measured Manuel, he just judged, think hes shorter than him he look thicker, thats does not him hes bigger, it can be his perception.
He seem very modest about his size, and maybe underestimate him like some other people

No. My point was those guys are thicker even if they are not bigger (length and girth combined) or longer.

Lex is longer than Manuel and he is bigger, but my point is Manuel is thicker than him. Al the guys Lex said are bigger are at least bigger in thickness. Do you dispute Manuel is thicker than Lex? :joy:
 

johanlo

Superior Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2008
Posts
1,392
Media
48
Likes
6,020
Points
418
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male

Attachments

mjeannin

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2018
Posts
73
Media
0
Likes
66
Points
28
Location
Los Angeles (California, United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male

johanlo

Superior Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2008
Posts
1,392
Media
48
Likes
6,020
Points
418
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
No photoshop. Top view, close up, and short head lengthwise all make it seem longer. Still huge. About 8x5.75 NBP. 10.5 is a fantasy.
Good points, thanks for The input.

I believe He is a Little longer though. I took a pic with my girl holding me with Both hands in a similar Way, and He is clearly longer(and I'm 8"). She can grab him with Both hands, suck The entire Head and there still is cock left... My guess would Be at least 8.5", maybe 9".

View media item 1330628
What do you guys think?
 

Shepardson

Superior Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Posts
2,761
Media
0
Likes
3,957
Points
208
Gender
Male
short head lengthwise
It doesn't always need to be for those type of shots if they know what they're doing. That "head at the end of the dick" POV thing is one of the go-to monster dick shots, as it gets the comparison object (head) as far outside the center expansion point of the lens as possible, without putting it off in the background or anything, so your brain sort of does a one to one comparison without realizing what's going on.
 

RokiD

Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2017
Posts
801
Media
0
Likes
1,060
Points
138
Location
Poland
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
Good points, thanks for The input.

I believe He is a Little longer though. I took a pic with my girl holding me with Both hands in a similar Way, and He is clearly longer(and I'm 8"). She can grab him with Both hands, suck The entire Head and there still is cock left... My guess would Be at least 8.5", maybe 9".

[photo="medium"]1330628[/photo]
What do you guys think?
he has easy 0.5" smaller glans than you and more downward angle at his pic, your is like 90 degree to the ground and his is 45
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ocine

Ocine

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Oct 24, 2013
Posts
2,206
Media
37
Likes
4,307
Points
333
Location
France
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
No. My point was those guys are thicker even if they are not bigger (length and girth combined) or longer.

Lex is longer than Manuel and he is bigger, but my point is Manuel is thicker than him. Al the guys Lex said are bigger are at least bigger in thickness. Do you dispute Manuel is thicker than Lex? :joy:

No what I despite is I think 6" girth is the new 8" lenght, before everyone though most pornstars was atleast 8 inch, now you can see there only few, also if alot are close to 8
I think its the same for 6" girth
 
D

deleted978960

Guest
Just stop lying dude.
wow nice hijacking the thread by 4 useless pages where you are stating you previously mentioned opinion striving
my post you quoted proves i never claimed to be similar to him lol i say he is 6" in length while i have not claimed more than 5.25" as for girth i never claimed to be over 5" also i was taking about proportions thats why i said length/girth i meant ratio of length to girth i though it was obvious since i never claimed to be 6x5.25
 

mjeannin

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2018
Posts
73
Media
0
Likes
66
Points
28
Location
Los Angeles (California, United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
wow nice hijacking the thread by 4 useless pages where you are stating you previously mentioned opinion striving
my post you quoted proves i never claimed to be similar to him lol i say he is 6" in length while i have not claimed more than 5.25" as for girth i never claimed to be over 5" also i was taking about proportions thats why i said length/girth i meant ratio of length to girth i though it was obvious since i never claimed to be 6x5.25

Dude the quote is there for everyone to see. You might have "meant" something else, but that is what you said. Also it doesn't make sense about ratios, you never mentioned that, you were definitely trying to say he looks a similar size to you. You did say you were smaller at 5 inches in other posts, but I think it's more likely you slipped up here and just boosted your size a bit to be in the same range as Adriano's than that you meant a "ratio of length to girth", when you didn't say that at all.

Here is what you wrote "i know he was never measured but when i saw his pictures he is very similar to me in length/girth and shape he is 6" max unless he has abnormally large hands." We are supposed to think you meant ratio and not overall length/girth? Keep in mind that you only guessed his length here, so you weren't even talking about the ratio of length to girth....or girth at all!!!

Anyways though it doesn't matter, this all started because you made a derisive statement AGAIN about Adriano being among the thick porn guys when you are so clearly wrong. So now we are forced to debate a side issue that you are lying about instead of you admitting Adriano ain't anywhere near as low as 5.25 girth.

Also quite a few peope like my posts and I got several PMs in the last day asking for analysis

I am not a previously banned user, unless you can prove it, I would recommend not making baseless accusations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zaromski

mjeannin

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2018
Posts
73
Media
0
Likes
66
Points
28
Location
Los Angeles (California, United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
No what I despite is I think 6" girth is the new 8" lenght, before everyone though most pornstars was atleast 8 inch, now you can see there only few, also if alot are close to 8
I think its the same for 6" girth

No, we can just look at the stats. 6 girth is about as rare as 7.75 BONE PRESSED according to lifestyles. It doesn't matter whether you agree with a particular study or not, there would be no reason why the RATIO of length/girth rarity wouldn't be similar. Other studies show similar ratios anyway. Therefore 6 girth is about as rare as 7.25 NBP in a very in shape person and 7 in a normal shape person.

6 inch girth is certainly rare, but it is far more common than 8 NBP. All the stats show that.
 

mjeannin

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2018
Posts
73
Media
0
Likes
66
Points
28
Location
Los Angeles (California, United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
No what I despite is I think 6" girth is the new 8" lenght, before everyone though most pornstars was atleast 8 inch, now you can see there only few, also if alot are close to 8
I think its the same for 6" girth

I'm not picking on you because I think you tried to make a genuine fair point. But it is stuff like this that can be very frustrating. Because I am sick of guys claiming Mandingo is 11 inches or Billy Glide was 7.25 girth or Shane Diesel is 11x8 or Danny D has a 10.5 inch dick etc etc. So I tend to agree with the lower estimates and the more reasonable guys who know the tricks here.

But your post is just the type of thing certain people will "like" here. If you frame something like "people dont realize how rare x, y, and z is. 6 girth is very huge" then people will love it here. Even if it goes way too far on the downplaying. Maybe because they are sick of the exaggerating liars, and I agree with them, but they are almost just as bad the other way looking for any angle to "debunk" big dicks. Again I'm trying to make a larger point that your post reminded me of, I don't think you did anything wrong by saying what you think here.

It is frustrating for me because I am more "on the side" (I take no sides on principle but I mean I tend to more agree with) the reasonable "downplayers" who think around 9 is the max and 6.5 the max girth and no one has both etc. I am usually frustrated at the ridiculous exaggerated claims as well. But I don't like to see "my side" engage in the same type of BS flawed logic, just the other way. It is like politically, I tend to criticize my own side more , because I don't even care about the other side of lunatics.

It is so disappointing to me that people who I agree with so much on here come with the same logical fallacies when it suits them. It's not really about dicks at this point lol, it says something about the human condition. It is rare you get an unbiased person who isn't ripe to become slanted in viewpoint. I try to get at "Truth" and not let emotions dictate my opinion. I am glad to see quite a few users seem to agree and have a more balanced approach as well rather than letting feelings make them argue for positions in contrast to the evidence and often their own previous opinions, but without any explanation as to the logic behind it.
 

Lance Bass

Superior Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2017
Posts
3,504
Media
0
Likes
3,412
Points
148
Location
Indian Springs (Maryland, United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I'm not picking on you because I think you tried to make a genuine fair point. But it is stuff like this that can be very frustrating. Because I am sick of guys claiming Mandingo is 11 inches or Billy Glide was 7.25 girth or Shane Diesel is 11x8 or Danny D has a 10.5 inch dick etc etc. So I tend to agree with the lower estimates and the more reasonable guys who know the tricks here.

But your post is just the type of thing certain people will "like" here. If you frame something like "people dont realize how rare x, y, and z is. 6 girth is very huge" then people will love it here. Even if it goes way too far on the downplaying. Maybe because they are sick of the exaggerating liars, and I agree with them, but they are almost just as bad the other way looking for any angle to "debunk" big dicks. Again I'm trying to make a larger point that your post reminded me of, I don't think you did anything wrong by saying what you think here.

It is frustrating for me because I am more "on the side" (I take no sides on principle but I mean I tend to more agree with) the reasonable "downplayers" who think around 9 is the max and 6.5 the max girth and no one has both etc. I am usually frustrated at the ridiculous exaggerated claims as well. But I don't like to see "my side" engage in the same type of BS flawed logic, just the other way. It is like politically, I tend to criticize my own side more , because I don't even care about the other side of lunatics.

It is so disappointing to me that people who I agree with so much on here come with the same logical fallacies when it suits them. It's not really about dicks at this point lol, it says something about the human condition. It is rare you get an unbiased person who isn't ripe to become slanted in viewpoint. I try to get at "Truth" and not let emotions dictate my opinion. I am glad to see quite a few users seem to agree and have a more balanced approach as well rather than letting feelings make them argue for positions in contrast to the evidence and often their own previous opinions, but without any explanation as to the logic behind it.

Mandingo is 9
 

mjeannin

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2018
Posts
73
Media
0
Likes
66
Points
28
Location
Los Angeles (California, United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male

Agreed she's 9x6. Theres no evidence to guess him at more or less than 9 except questionable hand comparisons (i get the idea if you average plenty you should be close to average hand width) but my issue is where those guys start nbp. They eithet dont tell you or when theyve shown it its been like 0.25 inch up the shaft or more lmao. You cant trust these guys unfortunately. They should show their work not just tell you "with pixels this is what i found." Its petty to round down a clear guy thats more or less 9. If Mandingo measured 5 foot 7 in front of them they'd insist he's 5'6.95 lmao
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lance Bass

Lance Bass

Superior Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2017
Posts
3,504
Media
0
Likes
3,412
Points
148
Location
Indian Springs (Maryland, United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Agreed she's 9x6. Theres no evidence to guess him at more or less than 9 except questionable hand comparisons (i get the idea if you average plenty you should be close to average hand width) but my issue is where those guys start nbp. They eithet dont tell you or when theyve shown it its been like 0.25 inch up the shaft or more lmao. You cant trust these guys unfortunately. They should show their work not just tell you "with pixels this is what i found." Its petty to round down a clear guy thats more or less 9. If Mandingo measured 5 foot 7 in front of them they'd insist he's 5'6.95 lmao

You seem to be realistic and not bias

What size would you give these guys:
BOZ
John E Depth
Richard Mann
Justin Slayer
 
  • Like
Reactions: mjeannin