all megan fox does is nag about how horrible her life as a celeb is. puh-lease! she needs to get over herself already. and, she is NO angelina jolie!
I think you were spot on the first time; Christina Hendricks... oh wow. Megan Fox is not my thing at all.Amen.
Or Jennifer Tilly.
Or Gina and Jennifer. :biggrin1:
I get it! You're marginally attractive! And! You even kissed a girl in a movie!.... applause please.
I'm sick of the talentless media-made women.
In a male world women can never state opinions about other women without looking catty or jealous.
You probably don't get women like that because there's really not much to get. They could never have the appeal of someone such as yourself. If you knocked heads you'd hear their's echo.Then please, explain. I get confused easily! :: twiddles hair ::
Haha
And Forest, you're right. She DOES have a great body but at the cost of almost everything else. Colored eyes, dark hair.. yes. It's her arrogance that makes me nauseated. I see it everywhere... I guess I just don't get women like that... but she IS a star... not just a minion like myself. :: shrug ::
Now that's a list longer than my...well, you get the idea. Just check out the subject of any recent thread by am12388.Yeah, I'm fucking going down this road.
I'm sick of the talentless media-made women.
I wasn't going to do this.
I swear I fought the urge to post this.
I hardly post anymore and my first post is going to be on Megan Fox?
Yes, it is.
Is anyone else sick of this cunt already?
I mean really..... Fuck off.
I get it! You're marginally attractive! And! You even kissed a girl in a movie!.... applause please.
Yeah, there's something behind the eyes that is mildly disturbing. She's not as obviously stupid as some. She's not as blatantly cunty as some. She's less plastic-y than some. But the total package is an inducer of big yawns along with a tinge of antagonistic wishing for her to go away.
I'd look if they posted her naked boobies online, though. But probably just the once.
Hmm, I'd heard there were no "real" photos of her topless. This appears to contradict. However, I note that in some of these photos she has top and bottom flesh-colored "movie coverings" (always forget what they're called). But in some, only the bottom part of her is covered. Why would they create a fakey thing for her top if she was going to brazenly reveal them anyway? Finally, there's something that looks slightly photo-shoppy about the ones with her bare boobies.
I love a good conspiracy though, so don't mind me. I love a good pair of boobies even more. Unless I have reason to believe they're 'shopped (in which case an angry somnolence takes me over; plus sudden onset of cravings for watermelon candy).
But, by all means, thanks for the link, and post as many boobie pictures as you want! :biggrin1:
Durn. Google failed me. But then, that was the point of my other thread.