Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Sex With a Large Penis' started by earllogjam, Jun 14, 2007.
Do you really care who sucks your dick on the other side as long has he is talented?
Never tried it - too scared.
Nope... just know how to suck uncut, please!
That's the thing about gloryholes. It's best to approach them with zero expectations or else you're sure to be disappointed.
Only once was I pleasantly surprised. Even so, a less-than-stellar BJ is better than no BJ, at all.
Definitely. Only gone a few times - but you better be hot, or i'll just rub one out to some porn by myself, or screw my girlfriend. I always check out who is cruising the bookstore before i go in. The thought of some fat old guy going down on me doesn't get me hot. Sorry, don't mean to offend anyone - but that's the way i feel about it.
That's the whole reason I've never done a gloryhole, and have no intention ever of doing it. I absolutely do NOT want to have any sexual contact with someone I don't know.
I really don't get gloryholes - one of the main points of sex is that it's interacting with another person, so what's the point of gloryholes, if i were a man I'd rather have a good old wank.
The only thing is that a mouth usually feels better than a hand.
True enough, earl, but I want to know who/what that mouth is attached to.
Absolutely DC :wink:
Applying lipstick to your thumb and forefinger to resemble a pouty mouth, then jerking off sounds a lot more appealing than gloryhole sex. Not to mention MUCH safer.
Yeah, I always have a fear that my dick will be sliced off. Some straight guys I know do it when they just gotta get their nut and JO just doesn't cut it for them.
Would you do it if that mouth was attached to a hunky guy?:smile:
Well, yeah, but then, that kinda defeats the purpose of the glory hole, right?:biggrin1:
Seeing that hunky guy, and watching his expression as I hit his tonsils (or where they used to be) is more exciting than the thought of fucking a hole in the wall.
Really, I do understand the concept; it's just that the very thing that makes it attractive to some guys is the very thing that makes is so unattractive to me. Maybe I just have trust issues or something. I mean, YUCK! What if it turned out to be Ted Haggard on the other side? Or Beverly LaHaye? Or Nicole Richie? <hurl>
Nicole Richie needs the sustinance.:tongue:
Fine. You feed it, I refuse to!:biggrin1:
Yes, Golum with expensive hair. I'm afraid of the teeth.
OH COME ON GUYS!When you are horned up and hardand ya JUST WANT TO GET OFF, sliding your dick thru a hole and having a hot mouth suck the hell out of it and and when its time to CUM shooting off and having them SWALLOWALL OF ITsure beats JACKIN OFF any day!!!used to have some around here, they are all gone now, MISS THEM!Sucked some terrific BIG HARD DICKS myself back in the day.
ive never been hard up to the point of bothering with a gloryhole or hooker.both are too damned risky.theres a very good chance you'll get more than you bargained for.whatever happened to morales??
The thing is, everyone doesn't live in places where there exists a large dating pool (if any, at all) to pick from.
It's not like we can all just hop over to The Abbey and have our pick from a hundred guys that look like they fell out of an Abercrombie & Fitch catalog. There is exactly one gay bar within a 100-mile radius of my house and I don't even bother to go, because every time I've been in there its clientele is 99% obese straight women who wish there were enough out fags in town for them each to be someone's best hag.
Where I live, you either get your BJs from ugly guys, or you do without. In that case, the gloryhole is your best option, because 1.) at least, then, you don't have to see the ugly and 2.) you don't have to bother to explain to the poor guy why he can't have your number.
And, by the way, geting your cock sucked thru a gloryhole is in no way like paying a hooker for sexual favors. When you're just interested in a little one-off, no-strings fun, how does buying your one-night stand dinner & a movie, first, make your actions "morally" superior?