Merry Christmas, unless you're gay.
- Thread starter Drifterwood
- Start date
Gays can't exist, otherwise that would mean that God fucked up creation. It's such wonderful abuse of logic.
Still, I'd rather have a Gay for Xmas than cancer.
Still, I'd rather have a Gay for Xmas than cancer.
nudeyorker
Admired Member
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2006
- Posts
- 22,742
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 854
- Points
- 208
- Location
- NYC/Honolulu
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Not_Punny
Superior Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2007
- Posts
- 5,464
- Media
- 109
- Likes
- 3,062
- Points
- 258
- Location
- California
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Female
I like the old fashion church, you know the kind that you can pay off the preacher or pope to bend the words of god a little to your favor or ignore atrocities of injustice in the world.
B_Think_Kink
Sexy Member
camper joe
Cherished Member
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2006
- Posts
- 2,744
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 475
- Points
- 193
- Location
- North Carolina
- Sexuality
- No Response
- Gender
- Male
Merry Christmas unless you're gay...
...in which case, it's Merry Christmas Gurl.
Ex this cracked me up. :chairfall: :lmao:
HellsKitchenmanNYC
Expert Member
D_Ireonsyd_Colonrinse
Experimental Member
MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYBODY!!
yeah, ok, even to the un-gay-friendly Pope Benedict XVI.... also know as Joseph Ratzinger....
Here's some Benedict papal doublespeak...
"Although the particular inclination of the homosexual person is not a sin, it is a more or less strong tendency ordered to an intrinsic moral evil, and thus the inclination itself must be seen as an objective disorder" ....Pope Benedict (got that everyone? Moral evil... objective disorder)
"Above all, we must have great respect for these people who also suffer and who want to find their own way of correct living. On the other hand, to create a legal form of a kind of homosexual marriage, in reality, does not help these people"....Pope Benedict (I love that "these people" reference!.... Of course, "these people" - meaning anyone with gay tendencies - cannot ever be viewed as happy. No, they must be seen as "suffering" from their objective disorder)
"According to the teaching of the Church, men and women with homosexual tendencies must not be accepted. They are called, like other Christians, to live the virtue of chastity. The homosexual inclination is by our law an abomination and homosexual practices are 'sins gravely contrary to chastity' ".... Pope Benedict (actually, to be fair, evangelical catholics are fearful of just about all forms of sexaulity. As the nuns still say, "Sex is for procreation, not recreation.")
yeah, ok, even to the un-gay-friendly Pope Benedict XVI.... also know as Joseph Ratzinger....
Here's some Benedict papal doublespeak...
"Although the particular inclination of the homosexual person is not a sin, it is a more or less strong tendency ordered to an intrinsic moral evil, and thus the inclination itself must be seen as an objective disorder" ....Pope Benedict (got that everyone? Moral evil... objective disorder)
"Above all, we must have great respect for these people who also suffer and who want to find their own way of correct living. On the other hand, to create a legal form of a kind of homosexual marriage, in reality, does not help these people"....Pope Benedict (I love that "these people" reference!.... Of course, "these people" - meaning anyone with gay tendencies - cannot ever be viewed as happy. No, they must be seen as "suffering" from their objective disorder)
"According to the teaching of the Church, men and women with homosexual tendencies must not be accepted. They are called, like other Christians, to live the virtue of chastity. The homosexual inclination is by our law an abomination and homosexual practices are 'sins gravely contrary to chastity' ".... Pope Benedict (actually, to be fair, evangelical catholics are fearful of just about all forms of sexaulity. As the nuns still say, "Sex is for procreation, not recreation.")
Vince, I'm glad you brought this subject up. I just saw the same article a few days ago. Sorta blows all organized 'religious' groups out of the water in my view. When people believe that the earth is the center of the universe, it's no wonder they would try and elevate Jesus and this crowd to God and saint status. No foundation whatsoever. I think the Vatican and the church are the biggest jokes being played out on the human race. I was raised a Baptist because the church was just across the street from where we grew up. Just before I was drafted into the army in 1968, I converted to the Roman Catholic Church. I believed all of that crap for over 30 years, until one day, I snapped and said this stuff just isn't right. How can all of this stuff be, when faith is so simple and personal. I personally think Moses was living a high life in the opium poppy fields with no drinking water. God said this and God said that, seems like God was speaking to lots of people back in those days. More people have been slain over the ages just because they didn't believe the way popes and rulers wanted them to believe. Tell me what's right about that. Anywho, just my thoughts, Happy Holidays to you all.
Primal_Savage
Cherished Member
Like we ignored the Pope when my bf and I went to Mass yesterday.
MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYBODY!!
The thing is that the Pope is the spiritual leader for half of the world's christians and a sixth of the world's population (over one billion souls). What he says is supposed to have a direct line to Jesus through St. Peter.
AquaEyes11010
Expert Member
I started this reply as a rant against the catholic church, which I'm sure has been heard before by and from many others already on this site, so I got rid of that. Let's look at this from a more political standpoint.
Technically, the vatican is a sovereign nation. Though tiny, it is a country, located within the boundaries of Italy. Its leader is the pope. While its only export is its ideology, that in and of itself has global reach. Now think about this country's actions and beliefs. While it no longer actively engages in aggression, it can be said to engender conflict in others. If you are against the actions of the catholic church, boycott the vatican as a nation and its subsidiaries (the salvation army is a big one -- find secular charities for donation instead).
And if you feel that this isn't the "christian" thing to do, look back at christian history. The catholic church had a violent separation from the orthodox church, and the many protestant divisions similarly broke off of the catholic limb. If you still feel that the words and actions of jesus warrant his continued worship, find a non-denominational church for services and carve your own rules out of that old tome called the bible. Doing so couldn't be more "christian."
Technically, the vatican is a sovereign nation. Though tiny, it is a country, located within the boundaries of Italy. Its leader is the pope. While its only export is its ideology, that in and of itself has global reach. Now think about this country's actions and beliefs. While it no longer actively engages in aggression, it can be said to engender conflict in others. If you are against the actions of the catholic church, boycott the vatican as a nation and its subsidiaries (the salvation army is a big one -- find secular charities for donation instead).
And if you feel that this isn't the "christian" thing to do, look back at christian history. The catholic church had a violent separation from the orthodox church, and the many protestant divisions similarly broke off of the catholic limb. If you still feel that the words and actions of jesus warrant his continued worship, find a non-denominational church for services and carve your own rules out of that old tome called the bible. Doing so couldn't be more "christian."
Before Christianity and Muslim, as they both share the same root, many culture were very accepting of Homosexuality and revered them as special. At the time christianity was born there were several prmominant leaders in the Roman empire that were said to be gay. Add that plus the fact that many mythology had god that were born on the same day of the solstice and died and reserrected to life in 3 days after being sacrifice. Plus there have been no evidence even now that Jesus even had existed, kind of like that 14" cock we hear about in here. My theory is that the Old testament were meant to bring down the Roman empire with Propaganda, and the the New testament were reign in to simmer the hateful attitude of the Old testament to use religion to control people.
Even though I like the teaching of Christ, much of the bible in whole do not make sense or follow logic. What was the purpose of having Jesus to be sacrifice? As Captian Kirk says in the final voyage "why does a God Needs a ship?"
Even though I like the teaching of Christ, much of the bible in whole do not make sense or follow logic. What was the purpose of having Jesus to be sacrifice? As Captian Kirk says in the final voyage "why does a God Needs a ship?"