MFM Views

[viking]

Originally posted by giozam@Aug 9 2005, 03:31 PM
So funny that this is being debated, because I brought up a similar subject in my post from last night. I shall copy it here for you:

I have a good friend who drives a cab, and we became friends one night after he picked me up and we ended up on the subject of sex. He had picked me up outside of one of the local gay bars. He asked me if I was gay, and I daid yes. As the conversation progressed, I ended up telling him that a lot of my fantasies involved heterosexual sex as well. He asked me if I had ever had sex with a woman, and I said yes, but only a few times while I was in high school and trying to figure out who I was. I then told him that the situations were kind of weird because both girls had a hard time taking me because I was pretty big, but that I had been with guys that loved having sex with me for the same reason. When I told him how big I was, he didn't believe me, so, being inebriated, I whipped it out and showed it to him. His eyes bugged out of his skull - he said he had never seen anything that big before. I just laughed.

Long story short, I still call him for cab rides, and we have become pretty good friends. We've even gone out for beers and to a couple of local college sports games.

He keeps telling me that I should try it with a woman again. The funniest thing is that I have actually been thinking about it. It's quite confusing to me. Do you guys think I should do it? The only thing that kind of freaks me out is that he has implied that he would like to watch. Do you think I should be weirded out, or should I just go for it? He has actually offered to introduce me to female friends of his that he says he knows would fuck around with me.

I get a feeling that he doesn't just want to watch...

[post=334112]Quoted post[/post]​

If the thought of doing it with a woman in fron of your friend turns you on then go at it.
Do you want to be watched?
Do you want him to participate.

If this situation interests you then you've got a willing audience,
and participants too.

Don't do it if you're not interested.

It's an easy choice.

Best of all, you don't have to try to find them, they've found you!

 

[D_Dick_Dock_Doe]

Good point. I am really thinking about it seriously. I'll let everyone here know what I decide to do.

 

[jonb]

Sounds cool. I take it he wants to either watch or participate. Three-ways can be fun.

 

[D_Dick_Dock_Doe]

Yeah - I think he may want to do both. I'm going to "probe" him further this weekend when we have beers.

 

[BobLeeSwagger]

Originally posted by jonb@Aug 7 2005, 06:15 PM
If you're going to enjoy the threesome experience, you have to get over your hangups about having sex with members of the same sex.

[post=333730]Quoted post[/post]​

That depends on what you mean by "having sex with members of the same sex." In a general sense you're engaging in sexual activity with another guy just because you're both participating. Being anxious about both being naked and very close together would definitely be a problem. But in a literal sense, you can enjoy it without either guy touching the other's genitals.

 

[B_UNKNOWN321]

I believe that chetthomas has hit the problem with MFM success stories squarely on the nose with the super stud status every man perceives himself to be in any extraordinary sexual adventure. Having never been in any 3 component hook-up I can only comment on observations from porn for all the combinations. The MFF always seemed rather boring for at least one of the females who always seemed to be just waiting for her turn at the prick. Well done MFM films seemed much more balanced even if there were no MM interaction. With all the delightful apertures on a woman, there is ample placement opportunity for two dicks and ample opportunity for plenty of other incendiary actions. Now with two big dicked guys with plenty of justifiable ego, I would think that a hot chick would be dripping from all her entry ports when gazing upon that very improbable combination. And since a big dick is interesting for a guy to look at even if he has a whopper, I would think that the libido of the two guys would shoot into overdrive. All in all it seems like the perfect threeway BUT only if both guys are well endowed to get the proper balance of the two male egos and the female should be adept at handling oversized dicks, two at a time. I am imagining at this very moment myself in one positioning that almost embarrasses me, I say almost embarrasses.

 

[SurferGirlCA]

MZ, you rock - with or w/o the emoticon thingie signing so! For some men, male sexual desire seems to mean finding an attractive receptacle, to put it bluntly. I had already been in several relationships, one an engagement (&#33, before I discovered how much I didn't know about my own sexuality. It would have been wonderful if that had happened with an attractive man who cared about my pleasure as much as his own. In fact, I was simply reading a book (no, not touching myself) when I suddenly had a powerful orgasm. Ok, granted, it was erotica, but I was like, "wow, who knew??!!" I started to gain a whole new understanding of my own sexual responsiveness and also what the possibilities might be with the right partner. I bear some responsibility in the past for not being more vocal about my needs/desires, but I think it takes an extraordinary level of self-esteem for women in our society to feel comfortable about being sexual - that whole madonna/whore thing. I know guys have their own issues in terms of sexuality and changing roles and expectations, etc., so I am glad we have a place like this to help share points of view.

Sorry, I know this post is totally off-topic! :icon_redface:

 

[B_DoubleMeatWhopper]

Originally posted by SurferGirlCA@Aug 12 2005, 09:51 PM
Sorry, I know this post is totally off-topic! :icon_redface:

Relating tales of powerful orgasms is a welcome off-topic meandering, so don't worry about it.

that whole madonna/whore thing.

And acknowledging Madonna to be a whore is also welcome. I know that's not what you meant, but allow me to enjoy my interpretation!

 

[B_Hung Muscle]

Originally posted by motlissof@Aug 11 2005, 10:39 PM
I believe that chetthomas has hit the problem with MFM success stories squarely on the nose with the super stud status every man perceives himself to be in any extraordinary sexual adventure.  Having never been in any 3 component hook-up I can only comment on observations from porn for all the combinations.  The MFF always seemed rather boring for at least one of the females who always seemed to be just waiting for her turn at the prick.  Well done MFM films seemed much more balanced even if there were no MM interaction.  With all the delightful apertures on a woman, there is ample placement opportunity for two dicks and ample opportunity for plenty of other incendiary actions.  Now with two big dicked guys with plenty of justifiable ego, I would think that a hot chick would be dripping from all her entry ports when gazing upon that very improbable combination.  And since a big dick is interesting for a guy to look at even if he has a whopper, I would think that the libido of the two guys would shoot into overdrive.  All in all it seems like the perfect threeway BUT only if both guys are well endowed to get the proper balance of the two male egos and the female should be adept at handling oversized dicks, two at a time.  I am imagining at this very moment myself in one positioning that almost embarrasses me, I say almost embarrasses.

[post=334774]Quoted post[/post]​

OK, that little description certainly piqued my gay interest. Peter North made a hot compilation tape of MFM or MMF or FMM or whatever you call it -- it and a little lube are some of my favorites things when my boyfriend is traveling. I've never had anything other than MMM (+M+M+M, etc) but the thought of another guy and a woman definitely puts me in overdrive.

 

[Max]

Originally posted by DoubleMeatWhopper@Jul 30 2005, 10:56 PM


Strait? They were rigid and exacting? (Strait is never really used as as adjective in contemporary English except as an element of the compounds straitjacket and strait-laced.)

[post=333468]Quoted post[/post]​

Sorry, a late entrant here (I have been away) ... but wouldn't the root meaning of strait (adjective or noun) be narrow? As in the Strait of Gibraltar.

 

[jonb]

Narrow, constricted, rigid . . .

 

[B_DoubleMeatWhopper]

Originally posted by Max+Aug 13 2005, 01:01 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Max &#064; Aug 13 2005, 01:01 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-DoubleMeatWhopper@Jul 30 2005, 10:56 PM


Strait? They were rigid and exacting? (Strait is never really used as as adjective in contemporary English except as an element of the compounds straitjacket and strait-laced.)

[post=333468]Quoted post[/post]​

Sorry, a late entrant here (I have been away) ... but wouldn&#39;t the root meaning of strait (adjective or noun) be narrow? As in the Strait of Gibraltar.

[post=335176]Quoted post[/post]​

[/b][/quote]

In straitjacket and strait-laced, the meaning is &#39;restricted, confined&#39; or &#39;restricting, confining&#39;: it is an adjective. Think of what the words actually mean : a straitjacket confines someone, restricts his movement. When a woman (or a man, for that matter) is laced into a corset, breathing is restricted and her posture becomes rigid. Her waist does become narrower, but that&#39;s not what the term strait-laced alluded to. As a noun, it means &#39;narrow passage&#39;.