Michael lucas : what do you think ?

hvdude

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Mar 9, 2015
Posts
3,080
Media
4
Likes
7,678
Points
283
Location
New York
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
First and foremost porn is a business and ML is a business person (good, bad or indifferent). How he chooses to pay his actors is between him and them, but why would someone pay $1000 to fly to Spain to make $500 (assuming he had had 3 scenes)? There's got to be an easier way to make $500. Is ML a creep? Well when you own a porn studio and make a living from exploiting young men then you don't qualify for sainthood. Are all studio owners creeps and is one worse than another? Who can say?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Capitolhillguy

str8fan

Superior Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2012
Posts
2,215
Media
0
Likes
3,622
Points
208
Location
france
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
First and foremost porn is a business and ML is a business person (good, bad or indifferent). How he chooses to pay his actors is between him and them, but why would someone pay $1000 to fly to Spain to make $500 (assuming he had had 3 scenes)? There's got to be an easier way to make $500. Is ML a creep? Well when you own a porn studio and make a living from exploiting young men then you don't qualify for sainthood. Are all studio owners creeps and is one worse than another? Who can say?

if a studio pays its actors, then it's not exploitation

if a producer doesn't try to give drugs to his actors and doesn't blackmail them, he is not necessarily a creep …

don't you think ?
 

hvdude

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Mar 9, 2015
Posts
3,080
Media
4
Likes
7,678
Points
283
Location
New York
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
if a studio pays its actors, then it's not exploitation

if a producer doesn't try to give drugs to his actors and doesn't blackmail them, he is not necessarily a creep …

don't you think ?

If a studio is paying the actors less than is considered normal, then there may be some level of exploitation. Creepiness is relative. For me if a studio owner (particularly the less than attractive ones) beds all of the hot guys he "hires" (and the actors do it to get the job) that to me is creepy. Very few, if any, owners/directors should be seen in front of the camera.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jmil83

tarheel6

Legendary Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Posts
1,381
Media
0
Likes
1,940
Points
268
Location
United States
If a studio is paying the actors less than is considered normal, then there may be some level of exploitation. Creepiness is relative. For me if a studio owner (particularly the less than attractive ones) beds all of the hot guys he "hires" (and the actors do it to get the job) that to me is creepy. Very few, if any, owners/directors should be seen in front of the camera.

ML has a long history, and there are quite a few "models" who have claimed he's mistreated them. It's everything from pressuring them into sex with him, to forced injections of trimex on set, to promises of pay that get cut back after the "model" shows. I don't know him, but I know some people who've had contact with him, and they all think he's a predator with no moral compass.
 

Capitolhillguy

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Posts
4,776
Media
11
Likes
14,796
Points
518
Location
USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
I really loved his videos about 4 years ago and before as he had lots of internal cum shots. I liked his stars better then. such as Michael Lachlan , Ben Andrews, and Jake Andrews . He was at one time hot, but after all the horrible stories about him and getting too botoxed I never watch scenes with him anymore.